Quantum Informed Machine-Learning Potentials for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of CO2’s Chemisorption and Diffusion in Mg-MOF-74
Source abstract
Abstract
Among various porous solids for gas separation and purification, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are promising materials that potentially combine high CO 2 uptake and CO 2 /N 2 selectivity. So far, within the hundreds of thousands of MOF structures known today, it remains a challenge to computationally identify the best suited species. First principle-based simulations of CO 2 adsorption in MOFs would provide the necessary accuracy; however, they are impractical due to the high computational cost. Classical force field-based simulations would be computationally feasible; however, they do not provide sufficient accuracy. Thus, the entropy contribution that requires both accurate force fields and sufficiently long computing time for sampling is difficult to obtain in simulations. Here, we report quantum-informed machine-learning force fields (QMLFFs) for atomistic simulations of CO 2 in MOFs. We demonstrate that the method has a much higher computational efficiency (∼1000×) than the first-principle one while maintaining the quantum-level accuracy. As a proof of concept, we show that the QMLFF-based molecular dynamics simulations of CO 2 in Mg-MOF-74 can predict the binding free energy landscape and the diffusion coefficient close to experimental values. The combination of machine learning and atomistic simulation helps achieve more accurate and efficient in silico evaluations of the chemisorption and diffusion of gas molecules in MOFs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
IBM Research, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, United States
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
IBM Research, Av. República do Chile, 330, CEP 20031-170 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Department of Organic Chemistry, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21941-909 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/3385910.1038/33859 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41563-021-01054-810.1038/s41563-021-01054-8 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr300014x10.1021/cr300014x ↗
4. 10.1038/s41467-020-17755-810.1038/s41467-020-17755-8 ↗
5. 10.1021/cr200327210.1021/cr2003272 ↗
6. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.4510.1038/natrevmats.2017.45 ↗
7. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c0098810.1021/acscentsci.0c00988 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.1c1622010.1021/acsami.1c16220 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0126610.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01266 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0358110.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03581 ↗
11. 10.1039/C9CS00609E10.1039/C9CS00609E ↗
12. 10.1002/adts.20190013510.1002/adts.201900135 ↗
13. 10.1021/jz300047n10.1021/jz300047n ↗
14. 10.1021/jz500202x10.1021/jz500202x ↗
15. 10.1039/C8SC00971F10.1039/C8SC00971F ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0749310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07493 ↗
17. 10.1038/nchem.143210.1038/nchem.1432 ↗
18. 10.1021/jp306252710.1021/jp3062527 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0370010.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03700 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0339310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03393 ↗
21. 10.1021/jp508249c10.1021/jp508249c ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0863910.1021/acs.jpcc.8b08639 ↗
23. 10.1039/C8CC06178E10.1039/C8CC06178E ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.05430310.1103/PhysRevB.97.054303 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.04104810.1103/PhysRevX.8.041048 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.09420310.1103/PhysRevB.95.094203 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.03.01610.1016/j.cpc.2018.03.016 ↗
28. 10.1002/wcms.115910.1002/wcms.1159 ↗
29. Zhang L. · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems · 2018 · 31 · 4436
30. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0107210.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01072 ↗
31. 10.1126/sciadv.160301510.1126/sciadv.1603015 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.14640110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
33. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20130044610.1002/anie.201300446 ↗
35. 10.1021/jacs.7b0945310.1021/jacs.7b09453 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.09.01110.1016/j.chempr.2018.09.011 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.13810310.1103/PhysRevLett.127.138103 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.475413010.1063/1.4754130 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.364110.1103/PhysRevB.58.3641 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.277070810.1063/1.2770708 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.11.02710.1016/j.cplett.2017.11.027 ↗
43. 10.1021/jp208529p10.1021/jp208529p ↗
44. 10.1021/jp311118x10.1021/jp311118x ↗
45. 10.1007/s00894-007-0233-410.1007/s00894-007-0233-4 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
48. 10.1039/C7RA11829E10.1039/C7RA11829E ↗
49. 10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
50. 10.1002/aic.69047071910.1002/aic.690470719 ↗