Chemotactic Separation of Enzymes
Source abstract
Abstract
We demonstrate a procedure for the separation of enzymes based on their chemotactic response toward an imposed substrate concentration gradient. The separation is observed within a two-inlet, five-outlet microfluidic network, designed to allow mixtures of active (ones that catalyze substrate turnover) and inactive (ones that do not catalyze substrate turnover) enzymes, labeled with different fluorophores, to flow through one of the inlets. Substrate solution prepared in phosphate buffer was introduced through the other inlet of the device at the same flow rate. The steady-state concentration profiles of the enzymes were obtained at specific positions within the outlets of the microchannel using fluorescence microscopy. In the presence of a substrate concentration gradient, active enzyme molecules migrated preferentially toward the substrate channel. The excess migration of the active enzyme molecules was quantified in terms of an enrichment coefficient. Experiments were carried out with different pairs of enzymes. Coupling the physics of laminar flow of liquid and molecular diffusion, multiphysics simulations were carried out to estimate the extent of the chemotactic separation. Our results show that, with appropriate microfluidic arrangement, molecular chemotaxis leads to spontaneous separation of active enzyme molecules from their inactive counterparts of similar charge and size.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, ‡Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
Funding
Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation · Division of Materials Research
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Leonard P. · Enzym. Microb. Technol. · 2003 · 32 · 310.1016/S0141-0229(02)00232-6 ↗
2. Chen J. · Lab Chip · 2012 · 12 · 175310.1039/c2lc21273k ↗
3. Reinholt S. J. · Anal. Chem. · 2014 · 86 · 84910.1021/ac403417z ↗
4. Nae S. · Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. · 2013 · 54 · 919
5. Lenshof A. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2010 · 39 · 120310.1039/b915999c ↗
6. Foudeh A. M. · Lab Chip · 2012 · 12 · 324910.1039/c2lc40630f ↗
7. Li Y. · Analyst · 2013 · 138 · 447510.1039/c3an00521f ↗
8. Atalay Y. T. · Biomicrofluidics · 2009 · 3 · 04410310.1063/1.3250304 ↗
9. Huh D. · Anal. Chem. · 2007 · 79 · 136910.1021/ac061542n ↗
10. Ng A. H. C. · Anal. Chem. · 2012 · 84 · 880510.1021/ac3020627 ↗
11. Destgeer G. · Lab Chip · 2013 · 13 · 421010.1039/c3lc50451d ↗
12. Jellema L. C. · Lab Chip · 2009 · 9 · 191410.1039/b819054b ↗
13. Sugiyama D. · Anal. Methods · 2014 · 6 · 30810.1039/C3AY40971F ↗
14. Alrifaiy A. · Polymers · 2012 · 4 · 134910.3390/polym4031349 ↗
15. Lee H. S. · Lab Chip · 2013 · 13 · 338910.1039/c3lc50280e ↗
16. Fu J. · Trends Biotechnol. · 2008 · 26 · 31110.1016/j.tibtech.2008.02.009 ↗
17. Masaeli M. · Phys. Rev. X · 2012 · 2 · 031017
18. Ito Y. · J. Clin. Apheresis · 2001 · 16 · 18610.1002/jca.1032 ↗
19. Kwon K. W. · Lab Chip · 2007 · 7 · 146110.1039/b710054j ↗
20. Cui H. · Lab Chip · 2009 · 9 · 230610.1039/b906202e ↗
21. Gascoyne P. R. C. · Electrophoresis · 2002 · 23 · 197310.1002/1522-2683(200207)23:13<1973::AID-ELPS1973>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
22. Weigl B. H. · Science · 1999 · 283 · 34610.1126/science.283.5400.346 ↗
23. Wang W. · Nano Today · 2013 · 8 · 53110.1016/j.nantod.2013.08.009 ↗
24. Wang J. · 201310.1002/9783527651450 ↗
25. Volpe G. · Soft Matter · 2011 · 7 · 881010.1039/c1sm05960b ↗
26. Zhao G. · Lab Chip · 2014 · 14 · 281810.1039/C4LC00431K ↗
27. Hong Y. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 17810310.1103/PhysRevLett.99.178103 ↗
28. Baraban L. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2013 · 52 · 555210.1002/anie.201301460 ↗
29. Pumera M. · Chem. Commun. · 2011 · 47 · 567110.1039/c1cc11060h ↗
30. Xi W. · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 129410.1039/C2NR32798H ↗
31. Muddana H. S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 211010.1021/ja908773a ↗
32. Yu H. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 572210.1021/ja900372m ↗
33. Gáspár S. · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 775710.1039/C4NR01760A ↗
34. Sakaue T. · Eur. Phys. J. B · 2010 · 75 · 38110.1140/epjb/e2010-00138-x ↗
35. Cressman A. · Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. · 2008 · 77 · 05090110.1103/PhysRevE.77.050901 ↗
36. Golestanian R. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 01810310.1103/PhysRevLett.105.018103 ↗
37. Colberg P. H. · Europhys. Lett. · 2014 · 106 · 3000410.1209/0295-5075/106/30004 ↗
38. Sengupta S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 140610.1021/ja3091615 ↗
39. Sengupta S. · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 241010.1021/nn405963x ↗
40. Switala J. · Arch. Biochem. Biophys. · 2002 · 401 · 14510.1016/S0003-9861(02)00049-8 ↗
41. Blakeley R. L. · Biochemistry · 1969 · 8 · 198410.1021/bi00833a031 ↗
42. Gossett D. R. · Anal. Bioanal. Chem. · 2010 · 397 · 324910.1007/s00216-010-3721-9 ↗
43. Steinberg G. · J. Biol. Chem. · 1996 · 271 · 751610.1074/jbc.271.13.7516 ↗
44. Jeon N. L. · Langmuir · 2000 · 16 · 831110.1021/la000600b ↗
45. Xia Y. · Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. · 1998 · 28 · 15310.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.153 ↗
46. Sia S. K. · Electrophoresis · 2003 · 24 · 356310.1002/elps.200305584 ↗