journal article·2026-07-03

A Synergistic Process Optimization and Data‐Driven Modeling Strategy for Unraveling and Enhancing the Low‐Light Response in Back‐Contact Solar Cells

Chenhui Zhang, Yuanjie Yu, Zhenhai Yang, Hao Huang, Qianhong Gao, Kun Cao, Guoyang Cao, Linling Qin, Xiaofeng Li, Yaohui Zhan

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT The interdigitated back contact (IBC) structure offers high efficiency potential for crystalline silicon solar cells, yet its low‐light performance (LLP) faces ongoing debates. This study systematically investigates LLP mechanisms in back contact (BC) cells via process optimization, simulation, and machine learning (ML). We identify leakage paths caused by residual “cap‐shaped” borosilicate glass in rear p ‐type poly‐Si regions as a critical bottleneck. By optimizing laser grooving through gap adjustments and additive engineering, the LLP of tunnel oxide passivated contact (TBC) cells is elevated to match that of TOPCon cells, reducing power loss to below 5%. Using SunSolve and Quokka3 simulations, we analyze module‐level double‐diode parameters and device‐to‐module losses. ML‐driven data mining reveals an inherent trade‐off between LLP and power conversion efficiency (PCE). To resolve this, we develop a multi‐head neural network integrated with an evolutionary algorithm for co‐optimization. This yields a candidate parameter set that effectively balances PCE and LLP across both TOPCon and TBC solar cells. Our work clarifies the microscopic origins of LLP limitations and provides a practical framework for designing high‐efficiency BC cells with superior low‐light response, accelerating industrial application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology Soochow University Suzhou China

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Flexible Optoelectronics and Micro‐Nano Manufacturing and Key Lab of Modern Optical Technologies of Education Ministry of China Soochow University Suzhou China

Suzhou CSI Solar Co. Ltd. Suzhou China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pip.391910.1002/pip.3919 ↗
2. 10.1109/jphotov.2013.227035110.1109/jphotov.2013.2270351 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41586‐025‐09681‐w10.1038/s41586‐025‐09681‐w ↗
4. K.Lin “Race to Net Zero: Analysis of the Global PV Market in 2025 and Outlook to 2030 ” accessed August 212025 https://www.infolink‐group.com/energy‐article/cn/solar‐topic‐global‐solar‐pv‐market‐analysis‐prospects.
5. 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.25610.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.256 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.solener.2017.08.06210.1016/j.solener.2017.08.062 ↗
7. L. G.Energy “BC Modules Outperform TOPCon by 3.17% in Field Test Demonstrating Clear Generation Advantage ” accessed August 222025 https://www.longi.com/en/news/rooftop‐demonstration‐in‐qinghai.
8. L. G.Energy “+7.54%! Good news from Longi BC second‐generation products again ” accessed August 222025 https://www.longi.com/cn/news/bc‐testimony/.
9. J.Solar “Field Test in Kagoshima Japan: TOPCon Shows 10.79% Yield Gain Over BC in Low Light Condition ” accessed August 222025 https://jinkosolarcdn.shwebspace.com/uploads/68905762/0731‐EN.pdf.
10. J.Solar “CPVT Yinchuan PV Module Low‐Light Performance Verification: TOPCon Shows Up to 4.38% Higher Gain Than BC ” accessed August 222025 https://www.jinkosolar.com/2025/PDF/072902.pdf.
11. 10.1038/s41598‐019‐57310‐010.1038/s41598‐019‐57310‐0 ↗
12. A.Calcabrini V.Kambhampati P.Manganiello O.Isabella andM.Zeman “The Relevance of the Cell's Breakdown Voltage in the DC Yield of Partially Shaded PV Modules ” in2021 IEEE 48th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)(IEEE 2021) 92 https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC43889.2021.9518842.10.1109/PVSC43889.2021.9518842 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.solmat.2024.11327710.1016/j.solmat.2024.113277 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.solmat.2023.11251310.1016/j.solmat.2023.112513 ↗
15. 10.1002/aesr.20220015410.1002/aesr.202200154 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467‐025‐61128‐y10.1038/s41467‐025‐61128‐y ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467‐024‐53275‐510.1038/s41467‐024‐53275‐5 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41586‐024‐08110‐810.1038/s41586‐024‐08110‐8 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.03.01810.1016/j.solmat.2010.03.018 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.03.01810.1016/j.solmat.2009.03.018 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.sse.2020.10790310.1016/j.sse.2020.107903 ↗
22. 10.1147/rd.165.052310.1147/rd.165.0523 ↗
23. 10.1016/0141‐6359(81)90008‐810.1016/0141‐6359(81)90008‐8 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.03110.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.031 ↗
25. 10.1186/s42825‐025‐00222‐910.1186/s42825‐025‐00222‐9 ↗
26. 10.3866/pku.Whxb2009062310.3866/pku.Whxb20090623 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.solmat.2024.11318510.1016/j.solmat.2024.113185 ↗
28. 10.1038/srep1911310.1038/srep19113 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.11003610.1016/j.solmat.2019.110036 ↗
30. 10.3390/en1707152010.3390/en17071520 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10489310.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104893 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.solmat.2025.11365610.1016/j.solmat.2025.113656 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.solmat.2022.11160610.1016/j.solmat.2022.111606 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.10955610.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109556 ↗
35. 10.1002/pip.359810.1002/pip.3598 ↗
36. Laser Enhanced Contact Optimization (LECO) and LECO‐Specific Pastes–A Novel Technology for Improved Cell Efficiency
37. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15967910.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159679 ↗