Polysulfide Immobilization and Sulfur Conversion Kinetics Promotion via a Tetrathiafulvalene–Crown Ether COF@Graphene Layer for High‐Rate Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The rational design of conversion‐kinetics‐promoting framework architectures offers a powerful strategy to overcome the polysulfide shuttling and sluggish conversion kinetics that limit lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries. Here, we report a new covalent organic framework, TUS‐44, constructed from tetrathiafulvalene‐based 4,4',4'',4'''‐([2,2'‐bi(1,3‐dithiolylidene)]‐4,4',5,5'‐tetrayl)tetraaniline and benzo[18]crown‐6‐derived 4,4′,4′′,4′′′‐(6,7,9,10,17,18,20,21‐octahydrodibenzo[ b , k ][1,4,7,10,13,16]hexaoxacyclooctadecine‐2,3,13,14‐tetrayl) tetrabenzaldehyde linkers. The resulting imine‐linked, π‐conjugated framework integrates heteroatom‐rich coordination sites within an electron‐delocalized π‐conjugated backbone, establishing a hierarchical, site‐specific interaction network (N > O > S) that governs Li + coordination, polysulfide anchoring, and dynamic charge redistribution. When coupled with conductive graphene to form an interfacial TUS‐44@G architecture, the hybrid layer functions as a chemisorptive, conversion‐kinetics‐promoting interface that regulates soluble polysulfides, facilitates interfacial charge‐transfer, and stabilizes intermediate species throughout cycling. This synergistic chemical–electronic coupling yields remarkable electrochemical performance: a high reversible capacity of 1455.7 mA h g −1 at 0.2 A g −1 , excellent rate capability of 773 mA h g −1 at 10 A g −1 , and outstanding durability with 0.034% capacity fading per cycle over 1000 cycles at 5 A g −1 . A Li–S pouch cell incorporating TUS‐44@G further delivers an outstanding initial energy density of ∼674 Wh kg −1 at 0.05 A g −1 (sulfur loading 44.558 mg), underscoring the practical potential of architecting conversion‐catalytic framework interfaces for high‐energy, durable Li–S batteries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials and Energy Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu China
Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials Tohoku University Sendai Japan
Department of Physics SRM University AP Amaravati Andhra Pradesh India
Centre for Computational and Integrative Sciences SRM University – AP Amaravati Andhra Pradesh India
Funding
Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. U. S. Department of Energy National Blueprint for Lithium Batteries 2021–2030 (2021) Page 15 accessed September 5 (2025) https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2021‐06/FCAB%20National%20Blueprint%20Lithium%20Batteries%200621_0.pdf.
2. 10.1038/s41467‐025‐60528‐410.1038/s41467‐025‐60528‐4 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat319110.1038/nmat3191 ↗
4. 10.1021/ar300134810.1021/ar3001348 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20140511510.1002/adma.201405115 ↗
6. 10.1002/adfm.20180118810.1002/adfm.201801188 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20160682310.1002/adma.201606823 ↗
8. 10.1039/C5CS00410A10.1039/C5CS00410A ↗
9. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c0044910.1021/acscentsci.0c00449 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20170559010.1002/adma.201705590 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.11110.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.111 ↗
12. 10.1039/C5EE01388G10.1039/C5EE01388G ↗
13. 10.1002/advs.20210600410.1002/advs.202106004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.14095510.1016/j.electacta.2022.140955 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20200077910.1002/aenm.202000779 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10837210.1016/j.est.2023.108372 ↗
17. Significant Constraints of SnO2, SnS2, and SnS2/SnO2 Heterostructures on Mitigating Polysulfide Shuttle Effects in Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries10.1002/celc.202100138 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20130329610.1002/adfm.201303296 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11581‐018‐2597‐010.1007/s11581‐018‐2597‐0 ↗
20. 10.1038/ncomms232710.1038/ncomms2327 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11581‐025‐06224‐110.1007/s11581‐025‐06224‐1 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.9b2185310.1021/acsami.9b21853 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.17610.1016/j.cej.2018.08.176 ↗
24. 10.1039/C6TA07221F10.1039/C6TA07221F ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.12.04610.1016/j.electacta.2005.12.046 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20110339210.1002/adma.201103392 ↗
27. 10.1039/C4TA03366C10.1039/C4TA03366C ↗
28. Novel Cu (II)‐Based Metal–Organic Framework STAM‐1 As A Sulfur Host For Li–S Batteries10.1038/s41598-024-59600-8 ↗
29. 10.1021/jacs.2c0759610.1021/jacs.2c07596 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.est.2023.11021510.1016/j.est.2023.110215 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.514428010.1063/1.5144280 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467‐020‐19070‐810.1038/s41467‐020‐19070‐8 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41560‐018‐0214‐010.1038/s41560‐018‐0214‐0 ↗
34. 10.1002/aenm.20180377410.1002/aenm.201803774 ↗
35. 10.1039/C4TA06511E10.1039/C4TA06511E ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.05.04510.1016/j.jpcs.2019.05.045 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.07710.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.077 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2022.10699810.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2022.106998 ↗
39. 10.1039/C8TA08843H10.1039/C8TA08843H ↗
40. 10.1002/anie.20242172610.1002/anie.202421726 ↗
41. 10.1039/D4TA09185J10.1039/D4TA09185J ↗
42. Yaghi O. M. · 2019 · 17710.1002/9783527821099.ch7 ↗
43. 10.1126/science.aal158510.1126/science.aal1585 ↗
44. 10.1021/jacs.4c1445810.1021/jacs.4c14458 ↗
45. 10.1039/D0CS01027H10.1039/D0CS01027H ↗
46. 10.1039/C2CS35072F10.1039/C2CS35072F ↗
47. 10.1038/s43586‐022‐00181‐z10.1038/s43586‐022‐00181‐z ↗
48. 10.1002/adfm.20170555310.1002/adfm.201705553 ↗
49. 10.1039/D0CS01569E10.1039/D0CS01569E ↗
50. 10.1039/D0CS00199F10.1039/D0CS00199F ↗
51. 10.1002/advs.20180141010.1002/advs.201801410 ↗
52. 10.1039/D0CS00236D10.1039/D0CS00236D ↗
53. 10.1021/jacs.8b1033410.1021/jacs.8b10334 ↗
54. 10.1039/D0CS00009D10.1039/D0CS00009D ↗
55. Reticular Design And Crystal Structure Determination Of Covalent Organic Frameworks10.1039/D1SC00738F ↗
56. 10.1002/adfm.20242169710.1002/adfm.202421697 ↗
57. 10.1002/aenm.20220354010.1002/aenm.202203540 ↗
58. 10.1039/C4TA00523F10.1039/C4TA00523F ↗
59. 10.1039/D3CP03986B10.1039/D3CP03986B ↗
60. 10.1021/acsami.1c2039810.1021/acsami.1c20398 ↗
61. 10.1002/smll.20200293210.1002/smll.202002932 ↗
62. 10.1093/nsr/nwaf19310.1093/nsr/nwaf193 ↗
63. 10.1002/adma.20210517810.1002/adma.202105178 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3608310.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36083 ↗
65. 2013
66. 10.1016/j.cej.2026.17567610.1016/j.cej.2026.175676 ↗
67. 10.1039/D0NR06732F10.1039/D0NR06732F ↗
68. Recent Progress On Covalent Organic Frameworks‐Based Sulfur Cathodes In Lithium‑Sulfur Batteries10.1016/j.ccr.2025.216988 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14751810.1016/j.cej.2023.147518 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16729010.1016/j.cej.2025.167290 ↗
71. 10.1039/D5TA02450A10.1039/D5TA02450A ↗
72. Understanding The Role Of Lithium Bonds In Doped Graphene Nanoribbons As Cathode Hosts For Li‐S Batteries: A First‐Principles Study10.1002/er.7438 ↗
73. 10.1002/adts.20180016510.1002/adts.201800165 ↗
74. 10.3390/molecules2621634110.3390/molecules26216341 ↗
75. 10.3389/fchem.2022.88875010.3389/fchem.2022.888750 ↗
76. Full‐Range Redox Mediation on Sulfur Redox Kinetics for High‐Performance Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries10.1002/batt.202100359 ↗
77. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.789210.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
78. 10.1088/0953‐8984/21/39/39550210.1088/0953‐8984/21/39/395502 ↗
79. 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
80. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
81. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
82. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
83. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
84. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.jmgm.2012.07.00410.1016/j.jmgm.2012.07.004 ↗