Tailoring the Work Function of Oxyhalide Solid Electrolytes via Sulfur Doping to Boost High‐Performance All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Achieving high ionic conductivity alongside interfacial stability is essential yet challenging for solid‐state electrolytes. Here, we report a sulfur‐doped oxohalide solid‐state electrolyte, LiTaO 0.5 S 0.5 Cl 4 , synthesized via a facile high‐energy ball milling method. Confirmed by the experimental and theoretical simulation results, sulfur incorporation significantly elevates the work function and ionization energy to 4.54 and 8.0 eV, respectively, reducing electron availability for interfacial charge transfer and enhancing oxidative stability against high‐voltage cathodes. In addition, the coexistence of S 2− and O 2− promotes in‐situ formation of a Ta 2 O/TaS 2 composite protective layer, featuring high electronic insulation and low Li + migration barrier. Consequently, the all‐solid‐state Li battery delivers a high‐capacity retention of 75.5% after 500 cycles at 0.5 C using LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 cathodes. This work demonstrates that anion doping is an effective strategy for concurrently improving ionic conductivity and cathode interfacial stability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials Science and Engineering Zhejiang University of Technology Hangzhou Zhejiang China
Science and Education Integration College of Energy and Carbon Neutralization Zhejiang University of Technology Hangzhou China
State Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Synthesis and Conversion Zhejiang University of Technology Hangzhou China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.4210.1038/nenergy.2016.42 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20220662510.1002/adma.202206625 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c0101210.1021/acs.chemrev.4c01012 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41578‐025‐00817‐y10.1038/s41578‐025‐00817‐y ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c0089410.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00894 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41563‐023‐01535‐y10.1038/s41563‐023‐01535‐y ↗
7. 10.1038/s41563‐025‐02374‐910.1038/s41563‐025‐02374‐9 ↗
8. 10.1002/aenm.20230342210.1002/aenm.202303422 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.5c1028310.1021/jacs.5c10283 ↗
10. 10.1007/s41918‐023‐00179‐510.1007/s41918‐023‐00179‐5 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0169010.1021/acsenergylett.0c01690 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.23642410.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236424 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20251325510.1002/adma.202513255 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20250406710.1002/aenm.202504067 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.5c1721310.1021/jacs.5c17213 ↗
16. 10.1039/D5EE02411K10.1039/D5EE02411K ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20221758110.1002/anie.202217581 ↗
18. 10.1039/D4EE00750F10.1039/D4EE00750F ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467‐025‐65702‐210.1038/s41467‐025‐65702‐2 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20251665710.1002/adfm.202516657 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20250310710.1002/adma.202503107 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jechem.2025.07.04210.1016/j.jechem.2025.07.042 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20241119710.1002/adma.202411197 ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20250522310.1002/aenm.202505223 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20251459210.1002/adma.202514592 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20250242510.1002/aenm.202502425 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20241000810.1002/adfm.202410008 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41560‐025‐01853‐210.1038/s41560‐025‐01853‐2 ↗
29. 10.1021/jacs.5c1148010.1021/jacs.5c11480 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20180393510.1002/aenm.201803935 ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20250408410.1002/anie.202504084 ↗
32. 10.1002/aenm.20220409810.1002/aenm.202204098 ↗
33. 10.1002/aenm.20230238310.1002/aenm.202302383 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ensm.2025.10451210.1016/j.ensm.2025.104512 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20250206710.1002/adma.202502067 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41467-024-48585-710.1038/s41467-024-48585-7 ↗
37. 10.1126/science.adt967810.1126/science.adt9678 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10679010.1016/j.est.2023.106790 ↗