journal article·2026-06

Forming Gas Annealing Improves the Performance of Ex Situ Sb‐Doped CdSeTe Thin‐Film Solar Cells

Sabin Neupane, Deng‐Bing Li, Abasi Abudulimu, Manoj K. Jamarkattel, Chun‐Sheng Jiang, Kiran Lamichhane, Sanjeeb Budhathoki, Alisha Adhikari, Ujjwal Dhakal, Hamim Sharif, Ebin Bastola, Adam B. Phillips, Feng Yan, Randy J. Ellingson, Michael J. Heben, Yanfa Yan

Small· Volume 22· Issue 33
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Group V doping in cadmium‐selenide‐telluride (CdSeTe) polycrystalline thin‐film solar cells has demonstrated improved power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) and long‐term stabilities as compared to the traditional Cu doping in the last decade. The dopants can be successfully incorporated by either in situ or ex situ doping. Here, we report that forming gas (FG) annealing enhances the efficiencies of CdSeTe polycrystalline thin‐film solar cells utilizing ex situ antimony (Sb) doping via close‐space sublimation of SbCl 3 at ambient pressure. The FG annealing increases the hole density and carrier lifetime, reduces the back barrier height, and, therefore, leads to improved open‐circuit voltages (V OC s) and fill factors (FFs). The champion device achieves a PCE of 19.2% with a V OC of 877 mV, a current density (J SC ) of 30.2 mA/cm 2 , and an FF of 72.4%. Importantly, the Sb‐doped devices showed improved stability under stress tests as compared to Cu‐doped devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Perovskite Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Astronomy and the Wright Center for Photovoltaics Innovation and Commercialization University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA

National Laboratory of the Rockies Golden Colorado USA

School For Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA

Funding

Air Force Research Laboratory · U.S. Department of Energy

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1361‐6463/ab9c6a10.1088/1361‐6463/ab9c6a ↗
2. 10.1038/s41560-019-0446-710.1038/s41560-019-0446-7 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41560‐021‐00848‐z10.1038/s41560‐021‐00848‐z ↗
4. 10.1016/j.joule.2024.09.01310.1016/j.joule.2024.09.013 ↗
5. NLR Certified Efficiency Chart (2026) https://www.nlr.gov/pv/cell‐efficiency.
6. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2022.320147910.1109/JPHOTOV.2022.3201479 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsaem.4c0317310.1021/acsaem.4c03173 ↗
8. 10.1143/JJAP.51.10NC1210.1143/JJAP.51.10NC12 ↗
9. 10.1002/pip.7003710.1002/pip.70037 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64370-410.1016/S1003-6326(16)64370-4 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.17210.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.172 ↗
12. S.Neupane D.‐B.Li M. K.Jamarkattel et al. “Effects of Chemical Etching in Ex‐situ Bi‐Doped CdSeTe Solar Cells ” paper presented at2024 IEEE 52nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC) Seattle Washington USA June 09–14 2024 https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC57443.2024.10749472.10.1109/PVSC57443.2024.10749472 ↗
13. S.Neupane “High Open Circuit Voltage with Organic Hole Transport Layers in Group V Doped CdSeTe Solar Cells ” paper presented at2023 IEEE 50th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) San Juan Puerto Rico USA June 11–16 2023.10.1109/PVSC48320.2023.10359656 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.solmat.2022.11161010.1016/j.solmat.2022.111610 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0287410.1021/acsenergylett.4c02874 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467‐022‐35442‐810.1038/s41467‐022‐35442‐8 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0014110.1021/acsenergylett.3c00141 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0927‐0248(00)00014‐310.1016/S0927‐0248(00)00014‐3 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11101210.1016/j.solmat.2021.111012 ↗
20. 10.1177/0021955X700060010310.1177/0021955X7000600103 ↗
21. 10.1002/solr.20240013110.1002/solr.202400131 ↗
22. Payling R. · 1997