journal article·2026-05Open access

Liquid Biopsy Differentiation of Pancreatic Cancer From Non‐Cancerous Pancreatic Disease Using Dielectrophoresis‐Recovered Nanoparticles Carrying Cell‐Free DNA and Protein Biomarkers

Anna Malakian, Augusta Modestino, Jesus Bueno, Archana Machireddy, Jason Ware, Sean Hamilton, Ella Stimson, Sarah Mitchell, Joshua C. Saldivar, Ashley R. Woodfin, Corey M. Dambacher, Kyle Gustafson, Delaney Shea, Srivathsan Ranganathan, Mehrzad Sasanpour, Christian Ross, Dove Keith, Jeong Youn Lim, Xubo Song, Scott M. Lippman, Rosalie Sears, Terry Morgan, Michael Heller, Stuart D. Ibsen

Small· Volume 22· Issue 29

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cancer‐derived extracellular vesicle (EV) nanoparticles carry important biomarkers but are difficult to recover from plasma, making EV‐based diagnostics a challenge for clinical settings. Here, we demonstrate nanoparticle‐based detection of pancreatic cancer using dielectrophoresis (DEP) nanoparticle recovery technology, which purifies nanoparticles from undiluted plasma and quantifies associated biomarkers. We combined both nanoparticle recovery and biomarker quantification on a single device by simultaneously collecting cell‐free DNA nanoparticles and EVs followed by on‐chip biomarker fluorescent staining for DNA and Glypican‐1. Using a blinded cohort, these biomarkers differentiated pancreatic cancer from benign pancreatic diseases, including cysts, pancreatitis, and precancerous low‐grade intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) lesions, with a sensitivity of 0.92, a specificity of 0.83, and an AUC of 0.93. The AUC increased to 0.97 for patients over 50 years old. This is higher than the standard invasive endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration tissue biopsy procedure (AUC 0.79). This study is among the first demonstrating a combined threshold of DNA and protein levels that can distinguish pancreatic cancer from its precursor IPMN lesions. We also demonstrated the detection of early‐stage pancreatic cancer and high‐grade in situ precancerous lesions. This DEP‐based technique shows that multiple types of cancer‐derived nanoparticles can be quickly and easily recovered from plasma making it promising for future clinical diagnostics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Extracellular vesicles in disease · Cancer Cells and Metastasis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center Knight Cancer Institute Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA

Department of Biomedical Engineering School of Medicine Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA

Division of Oncological Sciences Knight Cancer Institute Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA

RyboDyn Inc. San Diego California USA

Brenden‐Colson Center for Pancreatic Care Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA

Biostatistics Shared Resource Knight Cancer Institute Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA

Moores Cancer Center University of California San Diego San Diego California USA

Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA

Knight Cancer Institute Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.01.00110.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.01.001 ↗
2. 10.1080/14737140.2019.167006310.1080/14737140.2019.1670063 ↗
3. 10.1186/s12943‐021‐01309‐710.1186/s12943‐021‐01309‐7 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10544‐020‐00483‐710.1007/s10544‐020‐00483‐7 ↗
5. 10.1002/bit.2523810.1002/bit.25238 ↗
6. 10.1038/nrc306610.1038/nrc3066 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.11268110.1016/j.bios.2020.112681 ↗
8. 10.5493/wjem.v2.i5.8610.5493/wjem.v2.i5.86 ↗
9. 10.7150/jca.4964710.7150/jca.49647 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.06.01410.1016/j.bbabio.2006.06.014 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41571‐022‐00645‐x10.1038/s41571‐022‐00645‐x ↗
12. 10.1002/pmic.20180015510.1002/pmic.201800155 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.02.00310.1016/j.ymeth.2020.02.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jim.2014.06.00710.1016/j.jim.2014.06.007 ↗
15. 10.1002/pmic.20130028210.1002/pmic.201300282 ↗
16. 10.3402/jev.v4.2703110.3402/jev.v4.27031 ↗
17. 10.1007/978-1-61779-068-3_1510.1007/978-1-61779-068-3_15 ↗
18. 10.18632/oncotarget.2487310.18632/oncotarget.24873 ↗
19. 10.1602/neurorx.1.2.18210.1602/neurorx.1.2.182 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.170006510.1063/1.1700065 ↗
21. 10.1002/elps.20200015610.1002/elps.202000156 ↗
22. 10.3390/ijms15101828110.3390/ijms151018281 ↗
23. 10.1002/978111867144310.1002/9781118671443 ↗
24. 10.1002/elps.20210037210.1002/elps.202100372 ↗
25. 10.1039/D0LC00940G10.1039/D0LC00940G ↗
26. 10.1002/elps.20220029510.1002/elps.202200295 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0054910.1021/acsnano.7b00549 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0819910.1021/acsnano.7b08199 ↗
29. 10.1002/smll.20150089210.1002/smll.201500892 ↗
30. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.58115710.3389/fbioe.2020.581157 ↗
31. 10.4103/eus.eus_19_1810.4103/eus.eus_19_18 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.gie.2005.05.02410.1016/j.gie.2005.05.024 ↗
33. 10.1097/MD.000000000000965410.1097/MD.0000000000009654 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.03410.1016/j.gie.2016.04.034 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10620‐010‐1361‐810.1007/s10620‐010‐1361‐8 ↗
36. 10.4297/najms.2011.35510.4297/najms.2011.355 ↗
37. 10.1155/2018/538982010.1155/2018/5389820 ↗
38. The Clinical Utility of Serum CA 19‐9 in the Diagnosis, Prognosis and Management of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: An Evidence Based Appraisal
39. 10.1371/journal.pone.013904910.1371/journal.pone.0139049 ↗
40. 10.1158/1940‐6207.CAPR‐20‐064210.1158/1940‐6207.CAPR‐20‐0642 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10689‐008‐9214‐810.1007/s10689‐008‐9214‐8 ↗
42. 10.1038/sj.bjc.669060710.1038/sj.bjc.6690607 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41556‐018‐0250‐910.1038/s41556‐018‐0250‐9 ↗
44. DNA Fragments in the Blood Plasma of Cancer Patients: Quantitations and Evidence for Their Origin From Apoptotic and Necrotic Cells
45. 10.1097/00006676‐199807000‐0001210.1097/00006676‐199807000‐00012 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.05010.1016/j.cell.2015.11.050 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41525‐018‐0069‐010.1038/s41525‐018‐0069‐0 ↗
48. 10.1083/jcb.135.5.136910.1083/jcb.135.5.1369 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.plabm.2019.e0012510.1016/j.plabm.2019.e00125 ↗
50. 10.1002/pd.248410.1002/pd.2484 ↗
51. 10.1002/jcla.2267010.1002/jcla.22670 ↗
52. 10.1093/clinchem/39.3.44810.1093/clinchem/39.3.448 ↗
53. 10.1007/BF0054115310.1007/BF00541153 ↗
54. 10.1139/O10‐13910.1139/O10‐139 ↗
55. 10.1021/cr500373h10.1021/cr500373h ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.11.02010.1016/j.jsb.2011.11.020 ↗
57. 10.1136/gutjnl‐2016‐31243210.1136/gutjnl‐2016‐312432 ↗
58. 10.4174/astr.2021.100.3.14410.4174/astr.2021.100.3.144 ↗
59. 10.1007/BF0099401810.1007/BF00994018 ↗
60. Pancreatic Cancer: Diagnosis and Management
61. 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.02410.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.024 ↗
62. 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i9.31110.4251/wjgo.v6.i9.311 ↗
63. 10.3892/ol.2020.1205810.3892/ol.2020.12058 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.pan.2015.08.00110.1016/j.pan.2015.08.001 ↗
65. Serum EpCAM Expression in Pancreatic Cancer
66. 10.1186/1471-2407-13-40410.1186/1471-2407-13-404 ↗
67. 10.1093/ije/dyx23210.1093/ije/dyx232 ↗
68. 10.1186/s13073‐020‐0714‐y10.1186/s13073‐020‐0714‐y ↗
69. 10.3978/j.issn.2305‐5839.2015.10.3910.3978/j.issn.2305‐5839.2015.10.39 ↗
70. 10.1038/nature1458110.1038/nature14581 ↗
71. 10.18632/oncotarget.2662010.18632/oncotarget.26620 ↗
72. 10.1002/cam4.183310.1002/cam4.1833 ↗
73. 10.1186/s13059‐019‐1727‐y10.1186/s13059‐019‐1727‐y ↗
74. 10.1093/nar/gkt28210.1093/nar/gkt282 ↗
75. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty19110.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 ↗
76. 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_910.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9 ↗