Charge‐Tuning Ice Inhibition in Antifreeze Peptides
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Antifreeze peptides (AFPTs) have garnered significant interest as promising ice growth inhibitors. However, the rational design of AFPTs is hindered by the unclear functional roles of non‐ice‐binding sites (NIBSs), especially whether the charge‐specific effect on ice inhibition exists. Here, we design a series of charged AFPTs and clarify the hidden contributions of the “dark matter” NIBSs, revealing their essential charge impact on the cryoprotective performance. Moderate net negative charges of NIBSs create a hydration‐mediated interfacial environment that facilitates AFPT adsorption onto ice crystals and enhances ice growth inhibition. However, excessive negative charges induce overly strong hydration layers that hinder effective interfacial contact and reduce solution pH, thereby leading to cytotoxicity. Positive charges promote ordered water arrangements conducive to ice growth. The optimal charged AFPT (a net charge of ‐2) exhibits a 3.5‐fold ice growth inhibition rate compared with other AFPTs, as well as possessing biocompatibility, thus enhancing the post‐thaw red blood cells recovery rate to above 93%. This work offers new insights on elucidating the structure‐activity relationship of AFPTs and provides a promising approach for developing a next‐generation cryoprotectant in clinical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Physiological and biochemical adaptations · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Freezing and Crystallization Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Bioengineering School of Synthetic Biology and Biomanufacturing State Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology Frontier Science Center for Synthetic Biology Tianjin University Tianjin China
Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations Tianjin China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jacs.2c0020310.1021/jacs.2c00203 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.04010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.040 ↗
3. 10.1021/bm061044o10.1021/bm061044o ↗
4. 10.1016/S0278‐6915(02)00212‐010.1016/S0278‐6915(02)00212‐0 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20160923010.1002/anie.201609230 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467‐021‐22883‐w10.1038/s41467‐021‐22883‐w ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467‐017‐01421‐710.1038/s41467‐017‐01421‐7 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.11.03510.1016/j.actbio.2023.11.035 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c0033110.1021/acs.biomac.1c00331 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20170670310.1002/anie.201706703 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.0c0271910.1021/acsami.0c02719 ↗
12. 10.3390/biom905018110.3390/biom9050181 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41570‐022‐00407‐410.1038/s41570‐022‐00407‐4 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0128610.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01286 ↗
15. 10.1038/srep2361910.1038/srep23619 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1537‐2995.2008.01642.x10.1111/j.1537‐2995.2008.01642.x ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0189774410.1007/BF01897744 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.12.05310.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.12.053 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c0059910.1021/acs.biomac.1c00599 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11960410.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119604 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.03.01210.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.03.012 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c0170110.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01701 ↗
23. 10.1073/pnas.110042910810.1073/pnas.1100429108 ↗
24. 10.1039/C9CP03135A10.1039/C9CP03135A ↗
25. 10.1021/jp511971310.1021/jp5119713 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.489181010.1063/1.4891810 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp508128d10.1021/jp508128d ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.4c1853710.1021/jacs.4c18537 ↗
29. H.Qi Y.Gao L.Zhang et al. “Rational Design of and Mechanism Insight Into an Efficient Antifreeze Peptide for Cryopreservation ”34(2024):164–173.10.1016/j.eng.2023.01.015 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20160049610.1002/adma.201600496 ↗
31. 10.1002/mabi.20190008210.1002/mabi.201900082 ↗
32. 10.1146/annurev‐biochem‐060815‐01454610.1146/annurev‐biochem‐060815‐014546 ↗
33. 10.1002/aic.1782210.1002/aic.17822 ↗
34. 10.1021/jacs.7b1363010.1021/jacs.7b13630 ↗
35. 10.1039/b919724a10.1039/b919724a ↗
36. 10.1063/5.016978310.1063/5.0169783 ↗
37. 10.1021/jp510289t10.1021/jp510289t ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0255910.1021/acs.iecr.1c02559 ↗
39. 10.1039/C8CP05027A10.1039/C8CP05027A ↗
40. 10.1002/psc.141010.1002/psc.1410 ↗
41. 10.1021/jacs.8b0206610.1021/jacs.8b02066 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.06.03210.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.06.032 ↗
43. M. J.Abraham T.Murtola R.Schulz et al. “GROMACS: High Performance Molecular Simulations Through Multi‐level Parallelism From Laptops to Supercomputers ”1(2015):19–25.10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.193166210.1063/1.1931662 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b0027210.1021/acs.jpcb.7b00272 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0408010.1021/acs.jpclett.1c04080 ↗
47. 10.1021/jz501780a10.1021/jz501780a ↗
48. 10.1063/1.240842010.1063/1.2408420 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14132010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141320 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.13482410.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134824 ↗
51. 10.1002/minf.20160003410.1002/minf.201600034 ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c0091510.1021/acs.jcim.1c00915 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0030010.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00300 ↗
54. 10.1039/D0TB02426K10.1039/D0TB02426K ↗
55. Core‐Shell Microfiber Encapsulation Enables Glycerol‐Free Cryopreservation of RBCs With High Hematocrit