journal article·2026-03Open access

Advanced Characterization and Rejuvenation of End‐Of‐Life Lithium‐Ion Anodes: Toward the Development of a Green Upcycling Route

Luke Sweeney, Alexander T. Sargent, Yuhang Dai, Shangwei Zhou, Jianuo Chen, Francesco Iacoviello, Rhodri Jervis, Phoebe K. Allan, Peter R. Slater, Charles Monroe, Paul A. Anderson, Paul R. Shearing, Wenjia Du

Small· Volume 22· Issue 14

Abstract

ABSTRACT The limited duty cycles of EV batteries necessitate robust end‐of‐life strategies to prevent landfilling and enable responsible resource management. Recycling remains the ultimate fate for battery waste, yet current hydrometallurgical practices rely on often lengthy and energy‐intensive methods, which provide a major incentive for the development of cost‐effective, shorter‐loop regeneration routes to recycle end‐of‐life electrodes. This proof‐of‐concept study investigates the efficacy of deionized (DI) water and ascorbic acid (AA) in recovering entire spent anode systems from retired EV batteries without delamination and re‐manufacture. Multi‐modal characterization techniques were used to evaluate electrochemical, physicochemical, and morphological changes before and after treatment. High‐resolution X‐ray tomography and image‐based simulations were used to quantify the microstructural metrics of pretreated and rejuvenated anodes. 3D visualizations of graphite and pore phases revealed insights into recycling mechanisms and rejuvenation effectiveness. Results demonstrate that DI water effectively removed surface impurities on graphite, significantly enhancing regeneration performance, with stable discharge capacities of ∼2.65 mAh/cm 2 over 20 cycles at 0.1 C, which exceeded both unused (2.36 mAh/cm 2 ) and end‐of‐life (0.56 mAh/cm 2 ) anodes. The study demonstrates that green chemistries can offer a sustainable alternative to hydrometallurgy and highlights the vital role of X‐ray imaging in advancing circular battery technologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Extraction and Separation Processes · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

The Faraday Institution Quad One Harwell Science and Innovation Campus Didcot UK

Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford Oxford UK

Electrochemical Innovation Lab Department of Chemical Engineering University College London London UK

The ZERO Institute University of Oxford Oxford UK

Oxford Martin School University of Oxford Oxford UK

Funding

Faraday Institution · STFC Batteries Network · Royal Academy of Engineering

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41586-019-1682-510.1038/s41586-019-1682-5 ↗
2. 10.1088/2515‐7655/acaa5710.1088/2515‐7655/acaa57 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.372.6544.78010.1126/science.372.6544.780 ↗
4. The Waste Batteries and Accumulators Regulations2009 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2009/890/contents.
5. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0260210.1021/acsenergylett.1c02602 ↗
6. 10.1039/D2EE00162D10.1039/D2EE00162D ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.02110.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.021 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.12967810.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129678 ↗
9. Global Critical Minerals Outlook International Energy Agency (IEA)Paris 2024 https://www.iea.org/reports/global‐critical‐minerals‐outlook‐2024.
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.06410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.064 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20200110510.1002/adma.202001105 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.14019810.1016/j.electacta.2022.140198 ↗
13. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0537410.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05374 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.01310.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.013 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.10574110.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105741 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.02610.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.026 ↗
17. 10.1126/sciadv.abi763310.1126/sciadv.abi7633 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.joule.2024.07.00110.1016/j.joule.2024.07.001 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0102910.1021/acsaem.1c01029 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1872-5805(22)60648-610.1016/S1872-5805(22)60648-6 ↗
21. 10.1039/C9TA13913C10.1039/C9TA13913C ↗
22. 10.1038/s41893-019-0222-510.1038/s41893-019-0222-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12358510.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123585 ↗
24. 10.1038/s43586-021-00015-410.1038/s43586-021-00015-4 ↗
25. 10.1179/1743280413Y.000000002310.1179/1743280413Y.0000000023 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.11959310.1016/j.actamat.2023.119593 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mattod.2024.08.02310.1016/j.mattod.2024.08.023 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41467-024-55070-810.1038/s41467-024-55070-8 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.05.01910.1016/j.mattod.2019.05.019 ↗
30. 10.1002/smtd.20200119310.1002/smtd.202001193 ↗
31. 10.1002/aenm.20200265510.1002/aenm.202002655 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23081810.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230818 ↗
33. Observation of Zn Dendrite Growth via Operando Digital Microscopy and Time‐Lapse Tomography
34. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.10133310.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101333 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11668-024-01989-510.1007/s11668-024-01989-5 ↗
36. 10.1038/s43246-021-00160-z10.1038/s43246-021-00160-z ↗
37. 10.1016/j.softx.2016.09.00210.1016/j.softx.2016.09.002 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.1409510.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095 ↗
39. 10.1039/D2TA09769A10.1039/D2TA09769A ↗
40. 10.1039/D1CP00359C10.1039/D1CP00359C ↗
41. M.Loveridge Why Batteries Fail and How to Improve Them Understanding Degradation to advance Lithium-Ion Battery Performance(2021) https://www.faraday.ac.uk/insights/insight‐10‐why‐batteries‐fail‐and‐how‐to‐improve‐them‐understanding‐degradation‐to‐advance‐lithium‐ion‐battery‐performance/.
42. 10.1149/2.0611501jes10.1149/2.0611501jes ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22915910.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229159 ↗
44. 10.1201/978131527438610.1201/9781315274386 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.10.01110.1016/j.joule.2023.10.011 ↗
46. 10.1002/er.376210.1002/er.3762 ↗
47. 10.1039/D2GC03940K10.1039/D2GC03940K ↗