journal article·2026-03

Carbon Nanogrid‐Directed Interfacial Electric Field Engineering Boosts Selective CO 2 ‐to‐Formate Electrosynthesis

Zewen Wang, Meiling Wang, Mingwei Fang, Ying Zhu, Lei Jiang

Small· Volume 22· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Efficient and durable electrochemical conversion of CO 2 to formate at industrially relevant current densities remains challenging, as Sn‐based catalysts often suffer from poor conductivity, structural degradation, and overly strong binding to key reaction intermediates. Here, we introduce a nanogrid‐directed interfacial electric field engineering strategy that addresses these limitations by spatially confining Sn nanoparticles within a conductive carbon nanotube nanogrid framework (Sn@CNT). The hierarchical architecture induces intense and well‐distributed interfacial electric fields, which accelerate charge transport, optimize the adsorption–desorption kinetics of *HCOOH intermediates, and promote interfacial H 2 O dissociation while maintaining a favorable local ion environment. As a result, the Sn@CNT catalyst delivers a Faradaic efficiency (FE) of 95.6% for formate at 300 mA cm −2 , and maintains over 90% FE for 200 h in a flow cell in alkaline conditions. In the solid‐electrolyte cell, the formate combines with protons to yield formic acid, enabling stable production of 1.1 m formic acid at 400 mA for more than 300 h without observable performance decay. Operando spectroscopy and theoretical simulations reveal that the CNT nanogrid establishes a confined interfacial field that redistributes local charges, facilitates H 2 O activation, and lowers the desorption barrier of *HCOOH intermediates. This cooperative field modulation also establishes a mild microenvironment that enhances CO 2 reduction kinetics while suppressing the competing hydrogen evolution reaction. This work demonstrates nanogrid‐directed interfacial field engineering as a broadly applicable approach for tailoring electrochemical interfaces, offering design principles for efficient and stable CO 2 ‐to‐formate electrosynthesis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Bio‐Inspired Smart Interfacial Science and Technology of Ministry of Education School of Chemistry Beihang University Beijing P. R. China

State Key Laboratory of Bioinspired Interfacial Materials Science, Center for Bioinspired Science and Technology, Hangzhou International Innovation Institute Beihang University Hangzhou China

CAS Key Laboratory of Bio‐Inspired Materials and Interface Science Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41565-021-00974-510.1038/s41565-021-00974-5 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41467-021-25573-910.1038/s41467-021-25573-9 ↗
3. 10.1002/aenm.20190233810.1002/aenm.201902338 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20220081710.1002/aenm.202200817 ↗
5. 10.1021/jacs.2c0505910.1021/jacs.2c05059 ↗
6. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0068710.1021/acscatal.7b00687 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.01910.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.019 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja411388510.1021/ja4113885 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20200414910.1002/anie.202004149 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-019-13190-610.1038/s41467-019-13190-6 ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20250438010.1002/anie.202504380 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-021-20961-710.1038/s41467-021-20961-7 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.11013510.1016/j.nanoen.2024.110135 ↗
14. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0488710.1021/acscatal.0c04887 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20180350110.1002/anie.201803501 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0060610.1021/acsenergylett.2c00606 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-020-19135-810.1038/s41467-020-19135-8 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467‐025‐67719‐z10.1038/s41467‐025‐67719‐z ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11824310.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118243 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.04410.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.044 ↗
21. 10.1002/anie.20221117410.1002/anie.202211174 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-022-29783-710.1038/s41467-022-29783-7 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-022-29861-w10.1038/s41467-022-29861-w ↗
24. 10.1002/smll.20230612910.1002/smll.202306129 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.checat.2022.07.02410.1016/j.checat.2022.07.024 ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.4c0916810.1021/jacs.4c09168 ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20251170410.1002/anie.202511704 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20191076810.1002/adfm.201910768 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20191234810.1002/anie.201912348 ↗
30. 10.1038/nature1906010.1038/nature19060 ↗
31. 10.1021/jacs.1c1125310.1021/jacs.1c11253 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0465310.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04653 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matt.2023.12.01810.1016/j.matt.2023.12.018 ↗
34. 10.1007/s40820-023-01135-010.1007/s40820-023-01135-0 ↗
35. 10.1021/acscatal.4c0129010.1021/acscatal.4c01290 ↗
36. Bicarbonate‐Dependence for Pd‐Catalyzed CO2 Hydrogenation to Formate over an Electronegativity‐Induced Bimetallic Center
37. 10.1021/jacs.5c0397810.1021/jacs.5c03978 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-023-38497-310.1038/s41467-023-38497-3 ↗
39. 10.1002/anie.20240207010.1002/anie.202402070 ↗
40. 10.1002/adma.20250451510.1002/adma.202504515 ↗
41. 10.1126/science.adk984910.1126/science.adk9849 ↗
42. 10.1021/jacs.4c1452910.1021/jacs.4c14529 ↗
43. 10.1021/jacs.3c0239910.1021/jacs.3c02399 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41560-022-01188-210.1038/s41560-022-01188-2 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0478010.1021/acsnano.4c04780 ↗