journal article·2026-01

A Bifunctional Boron‐Ester Anion Receptor to Stabilize LiPF 6‐ Containing Carbonate Electrolyte for Lithium Metal Batteries

Chuang Chen, Yongjie Xu, Xueying Zhang, Tian Qiu, Zhiqiang Zheng, Zhanghua Fu, Liming Zhang, Cheng Hu

Small· Volume 22· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The instability of LiPF 6 ‐containing carbonate electrolytes hinders its application in lithium (Li) metal anodes. Although anion receptors can introduce LiNO 3 to improve electrolyte stability, commonly used anion receptors such as tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (TPFPB) can paradoxically accelerate the hydrolysis of PF 5 and generate corrosive HF. This study proposes nitro‐triol borate (NTB), a novel bifunctional boron‐ester anion receptor designed to suppress PF 5 hydrolysis while introducing LiNO 3 to enhance Li reversibility. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations and experimental results demonstrate that, unlike the sterically hindered TPFPB, NTB effectively binds PF 5 , thereby significantly reducing its chemical activity and increasing the energy barrier to hydrolysis. This stabilization, coupled with the introduced LiNO 3 , promotes the formation of a dense, homogeneous, and inorganic‐rich solid electrolyte interphase. Consequently, Li||Cu cells with the NTB‐modified electrolyte present stable cycling exceeding 400 cycles and achieve a high average Coulombic efficiency (ACE) of 99.1%. Li||NCM811 full cells also exhibit enhanced cycling stability under a low N/P ratio of 2.5, retaining 74.3% capacity after 200 charge and discharge cycles. This work elucidates the previously overlooked detrimental effects of anion receptors and presents a new strategy for engineering novel anion receptors to achieve stable, high‐performance lithium metal batteries in LiPF 6 ‐containing carbonate electrolytes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory for Liquid‐Solid Structural Evolution and Processing of Materials (Ministry of Education) School of Materials Science and Engineering Shandong University Ji'nan Shandong 250061 P. R. China

Shenzhen Research Institute of Shandong University Shenzhen Guangdong 518057 P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Li M. · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 3010.1002/adma.201800561 ↗
2. Lin D. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2017 · 12 · 19410.1038/nnano.2017.16 ↗
3. Zhang L. · Energy Storage Mater. · 2024 · 6910.1016/j.ensm.2024.103397 ↗
4. Li X. · Small · 2021 · 1710.1002/smll.202101881 ↗
5. Guan X. · Small · 2018 · 1410.1002/smll.201801423 ↗
6. Ma Y. · Energy Storage Mater. · 2018 · 11 · 19710.1016/j.ensm.2017.10.015 ↗
7. Han J. · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 3110.1002/adma.201804822 ↗
8. Goodenough J. B. · Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 58710.1021/cm901452z ↗
9. Barré A. · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 241 · 68010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.040 ↗
10. Liao Y. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2024 · 1410.1002/aenm.202304295 ↗
11. Zhang X. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2018 · 57 · 530110.1002/anie.201801513 ↗
12. You Y. · Small · 2024 · 2010.1002/smll.202310843 ↗
13. Zhong J. · Small · 2024 · 2010.1002/smll.202308678 ↗
14. Li X. · eScience · 2021 · 1 · 10810.1016/j.esci.2021.12.006 ↗
15. Liu S. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2021 · 60 · 366110.1002/anie.202012005 ↗
16. Wang X. · Adv. Mater. · 2021 · 3310.1002/adma.202007945 ↗
17. Li S. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2020 · 5910.1002/anie.202004853 ↗
18. Li L. F. · J. Power Sources · 2008 · 184 · 51710.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.03.016 ↗
19. Liu S. · Energy Storage Mater. · 2023 · 6210.1016/j.ensm.2023.102959 ↗
20. Chae O. B. · ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 6 · 385110.1021/acsenergylett.1c01999 ↗
21. Huang K. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2021 · 6010.1002/anie.202104671 ↗
22. Chen Z. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2006 · 15310.1149/1.2194633 ↗
23. Chang C.‐C. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2009 · 156 · A82810.1149/1.3205861 ↗
24. Sun X. · Electrochem. Solid St. · 2002 · 5 · A24810.1149/1.1510321 ↗
25. Li X. · Adv. Sci. · 2022 · 910.1002/advs.202201297 ↗
26. Kartal M. · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2016 · 41 · 760010.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.092 ↗
27. Wotango A. S. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 241010.1021/acsami.6b13105 ↗
28. Li F. · Angew. Chem. Inte. Ed. · 2022 · 6110.1002/anie.202205091 ↗
29. Han J.‐G. · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 44610.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227366 ↗
30. Song Z. · J. Power Sources · 2022 · 52610.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231105 ↗
31. Lee H. S. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 15110.1149/1.1779407 ↗
32. Huang Z. · Nat. Rev. Chem. · 2023 · 7 · 61610.1038/s41570-023-00506-w ↗
33. Bridgeman A. J. · J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. · 2001 · 209510.1039/b102094n ↗
34. Nair N. G. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2009 · 113 · 591810.1021/jp901952t ↗
35. Xu C. · Chem. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 225410.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05247 ↗
36. Wu D. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2022 · 1210.1002/aenm.202200337 ↗
37. Fu R. · Acta Phys.‐Chim. Sin · 2014 · 30 · 62810.3866/PKU.WHXB201401211 ↗
38. Stoyanov S. R. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2010 · 114 · 218010.1021/jp908641t ↗
39. Dolgonosov A. M. · Theor. Chem. Acc. · 2021 · 140 · 14310.1007/s00214-021-02841-x ↗
40. Mayer I. · J. Comput. Chem. · 2007 · 28 · 20410.1002/jcc.20494 ↗
41. Spotte‐Smith E. W. C. · ACS Energy Lett. · 2023 · 8 · 34710.1021/acsenergylett.2c02351 ↗
42. Adams B. D. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 810.1002/aenm.201702097 ↗
43. Xiong S. · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 246 · 84010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.041 ↗
44. Piao Z. · Adv. Mater. · 2022 · 3410.1002/adma.202108400 ↗
45. Liang P. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2024 · 3410.1002/adfm.202309858 ↗
46. Chen X. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2020 · 59 · 774310.1002/anie.202000375 ↗
47. Hobold G. M. · Nat. Energy · 2021 · 6 · 95110.1038/s41560-021-00910-w ↗
48. Shen L. · Small · 2020 · 1610.1002/smll.202000699 ↗
49. Wen Z. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2022 · 3210.1002/adfm.202204768 ↗
50. Fang W. · Nano Energy · 2022 · 10410.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107881 ↗
51. Zhao Q. · Joule · 2021 · 5 · 111910.1016/j.joule.2021.03.024 ↗
52. Zhang Q. · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 201110.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05283 ↗
53. Han B. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2021 · 14 · 488210.1039/D1EE01678D ↗
54. Stuckenberg S. · Small · 2024 · 2010.1002/smll.202305203 ↗
55. Kim S. · Small · 2023 · 1910.1002/smll.202207222 ↗
56. Tan J. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2021 · 1110.1002/aenm.202100046 ↗
57. Zhou M. · J. Energy Chem. · 2023 · 85 · 18110.1016/j.jechem.2023.06.008 ↗
58. Wang G. · Nano Energy · 2025 · 14010.1016/j.nanoen.2025.111064 ↗
59. M. J.Frisch G. W.Trucks H. B.Schlegel et al. Gaussian 16 Rev. C.01 Gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT2019.
60. Cossi M. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 286 · 25310.1016/S0009-2614(98)00106-7 ↗
61. Becke A. D. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1993 · 98 · 564810.1063/1.464913 ↗
62. Lee C. · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 37 · 78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
63. Krishnan R. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1980 · 72 · 65010.1063/1.438955 ↗
64. Lu T. · J. Comput. Chem. · 2012 · 33 · 58010.1002/jcc.22885 ↗
65. Humphrey W. · J. Mol. Graphics · 1996 · 14 · 3310.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗