Comparative Theoretical Investigation of Al‐ and Mg‐Doped Li 2 FeSiO 4 and its Pristine Form as Cathode Materials for Li‐Ion Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Li 2 FeSiO 4 exhibits intrinsically low electronic conductivity and sluggish lithium‐ion diffusion kinetics, severely restricting its practical capacity. This paper systematically investigates two representative doping modification mechanisms with first‐principles calculations, providing theoretical paradigms for potential research systems. DFT+U calculations demonstrate that Al‐doped significantly enhances electronic conductivity by reducing the bandgap, whereas Mg‐doped does not. Al as a shallow donor impurity decreases the bandgap via promoting the splitting of Fe‐3d energy level. Climbing‐image nudged elastic band (CI‐NEB) calculations further reveal that both Al‐ and Mg‐ doped effectively lower the energy barrier for Li‐ion migration, thereby facilitating enhanced Li‐ion transport. Notably, Mg‐doped demonstrates superior performance in reducing migration barriers compared to Al‐doped. Ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations confirm that doping improved Li‐ion migration at ambient temperature (298 K). The above conclusions provide two different types of doping improvement for the optimization of LFS, which is conducive to promoting the commercial application of LFS.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shaanxi Key Laboratory for Theoretical Physics Frontiers Institute of Modern Physics, Northwest University Xi'an 710127 P. R. China
School of Physics Northwest University Xi'an 710127 P. R. China
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0025-5408(76)90077-510.1016/0025-5408(76)90077-5 ↗
2. 10.1149/1.183764910.1149/1.1837649 ↗
3. 10.1149/1.183757110.1149/1.1837571 ↗
4. 10.1021/cm901452z10.1021/cm901452z ↗
5. 10.1016/j.elecom.2004.11.00810.1016/j.elecom.2004.11.008 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.03.01210.1016/j.elecom.2006.03.012 ↗
7. 10.1039/B605578H10.1039/B605578H ↗
8. 10.1039/B601184E10.1039/B601184E ↗
9. 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.06.00310.1016/j.elecom.2006.06.003 ↗
10. 10.1021/ja201854310.1021/ja2018543 ↗
11. 10.1021/ja805543p10.1021/ja805543p ↗
12. 10.1021/nl202681b10.1021/nl202681b ↗
13. 10.1039/C5TA01529D10.1039/C5TA01529D ↗
14. 10.1016/j.elecom.2005.11.01010.1016/j.elecom.2005.11.010 ↗
15. 10.1021/cm063011l10.1021/cm063011l ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.06410.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.064 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.08910.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.089 ↗
18. 10.1039/b711552k10.1039/b711552k ↗
19. 10.1039/c1jm10312a10.1039/c1jm10312a ↗
20. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.12.00410.1016/j.nanoen.2015.12.004 ↗
21. 10.1149/1.212893910.1149/1.2128939 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.7b1759710.1021/acsami.7b17597 ↗
23. 10.1002/ente.20130018110.1002/ente.201300181 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2009.11.03510.1016/j.jelechem.2009.11.035 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.13710.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.137 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ssi.2018.07.02110.1016/j.ssi.2018.07.021 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja109695r10.1021/ja109695r ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.7b0750210.1021/acsami.7b07502 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0272510.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02725 ↗
30. 10.1002/pssa.20100111610.1002/pssa.201001116 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.07.19010.1016/j.electacta.2013.07.190 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.01410.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.014 ↗
33. 10.3390/en1202022410.3390/en12020224 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ssi.2020.11543610.1016/j.ssi.2020.115436 ↗
35. 10.1039/b901825e10.1039/b901825e ↗
36. 10.1002/jcc.2105710.1002/jcc.21057 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.94310.1103/PhysRevB.44.943 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.132967210.1063/1.1329672 ↗