A CMOS‐Compatible Protonic Memristor Made from H‐Graphene/ZrO2/HxWO3 Stacks with Asymmetrical Proton Concentration
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Protonic memristor has recently garnered extensive research interest as one of the most promising memories for nonvolatile data storage and neuromorphic computing applications. However, the CMOS‐combability in protonic device fabrication and operating is difficult to achieve. In this study, a proton‐based H‐graphene/ZrO2/HxWO3 memristor device is demonstrated, which showcases resistive switching behavior in multiple operating environments such as vacuum, atmosphere, and high high‐humidity environment. The fabrication and operating processes are also CMOS‐compatible, enabling the integration of protonic memristors in Si‐based integrated circuits. Multistate resistive switching is demonstrated by a short writing voltage pulse (1–20 µs in pulse width) enabled by the rapid diffusion speed of proton, which renders it a good candidate for applications in high‐speed nonvolatile memory and artificial synapse for persistent reverberatory neuromorphic system and fast pattern learning via spike‐rate‐dependent plasticity (SRDP) rule.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Photoreceptor and optogenetics research · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA 15261 USA
Funding
Division of Computing and Communication Foundations · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Yang J. J. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 1310.1038/nnano.2012.240 ↗
2. Lee M.‐J. · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 62510.1038/nmat3070 ↗
3. Park S.‐O. · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 288810.1038/s41467-022-30539-6 ↗
4. Yan X. B. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 9710.1063/1.3488810 ↗
5. Chang C.‐F. · Small · 2017 · 1310.1002/smll.201603116 ↗
6. Kang J. · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 404010.1038/s41467-022-31804-4 ↗
7. Zhang F. · Nat. Commun. · 2023 · 14 · 395010.1038/s41467-023-39687-9 ↗
8. Kireev D. · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 438610.1038/s41467-022-32078-6 ↗
9. Liu Q. · Nano Energy · 2022 · 10210.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107686 ↗
10. Chang Y.‐F. · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 610.1038/srep21268 ↗
11. Cui J. · Nat. Electron. · 2023 · 6 · 29210.1038/s41928-023-00939-7 ↗
12. Elias D. C. · Science · 2009 · 323 · 61010.1126/science.1167130 ↗
13. Li S. · Nat. Electron. · 2021 · 4 · 25410.1038/s41928-021-00548-2 ↗
14. Ferrari A. C. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 23510.1038/nnano.2013.46 ↗
15. Sofo J. O. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 7510.1103/PhysRevB.75.153401 ↗
16. Boukhvalov D. W. · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 7710.1103/PhysRevB.77.035427 ↗
17. Prins R. H. S. · Chem. Rev. · 2012 · 112 · 271410.1021/cr200346z ↗
18. Rico V. J. · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2007 · 16 · 10710.1016/j.diamond.2006.04.002 ↗
19. ViolBarbosa C. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA · 2016 · 11310.1073/pnas.1611745113 ↗
20. Tang Y. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2022 · 3210.1002/adfm.202107653 ↗
21. Triwahyono S. · Appl. Catal., A · 2003 · 242 · 10110.1016/S0926-860X(02)00523-9 ↗
22. Zhu J. · Appl. Phys. Rev. · 2020 · 710.1063/1.5118217 ↗
23. Humood K. · Mater. Sci. Eng., B · 2021 · 27110.1016/j.mseb.2021.115267 ↗
24. Lübben M. · Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2018 · 410.1002/aelm.201700458 ↗
25. Hu H. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2024 · 3410.1002/adfm.202302290 ↗
26. Yang J. J. · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 2010.1088/0957-4484/20/21/215201 ↗
27. Gu Y. · Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2022 · 810.1002/aelm.202100515 ↗
28. R.Degraeve A.Fantini N.Raghavan L.Goux S.Clima Y. Y.Chen A.Belmonte S.Cosemans B.Govoreanu D. J.Wouters P.Roussel inProceedings of the 21th Int. Symp. on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA) IEEE New York2014 pp.245–249.10.1109/IPFA.2014.6898205 ↗
29. Menzel S. · Nanoscale · 2015 · 710.1039/C5NR02258D ↗
30. Z.Wei T.Takagi Y.Kanzawa Y.Katoh T.Ninomiya K.Kawai S.Muraoka S.Mitani K.Katayama S.Fujii R.Miyanaga in2011 Int. Electron Devices Meeting IEEE New York2011 https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2011.6131650.10.1109/IEDM.2011.6131650 ↗
31. Sun B. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 10510.1063/1.3055414 ↗
32. Zhang X. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 1310.1021/acsami.1c05590 ↗
33. Valov I. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 5110.1088/1361-6463/aad581 ↗
34. Schmitt R. · ACS Nano · 2017 · 11 · 888110.1021/acsnano.7b03116 ↗
35. B.Gao H.Wu W.Wu X.Wang P.Yao Y.Xi W.Zhang N.Deng P.Huang X.Liu J.Kang in2017 IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) IEEE New York2017 https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2017.8268326.10.1109/IEDM.2017.8268326 ↗
36. Park S.‐M. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 106910.1021/acsami.9b18794 ↗
37. Guan X. · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2012 · 59 · 117210.1109/TED.2012.2184545 ↗
38. Mohanty S. K. · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2021 · 42 · 177010.1109/LED.2021.3125151 ↗
39. Rao M. · Nature · 2023 · 615 · 82310.1038/s41586-023-05759-5 ↗
40. Yao P. · Nature · 2020 · 577 · 64110.1038/s41586-020-1942-4 ↗
41. Wang Z. · Nanoscale · 2016 · 810.1039/C6NR00476H ↗
42. Kumar S. · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2022 · 7 · 57510.1038/s41578-022-00434-z ↗
43. Lau P.‐M. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA · 2005 · 10210.1073/pnas.0500717102 ↗
44. Major G. · Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. · 2004 · 14 · 67510.1016/j.conb.2004.10.017 ↗
45. Briggs F. · Nature · 2013 · 499 · 47610.1038/nature12276 ↗
46. McCormick D. A. · Cereb. Cortex · 2003 · 13 · 121910.1093/cercor/bhg104 ↗
47. Milo V. · IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst. · 2018 · 26 · 280610.1109/TVLSI.2018.2818978 ↗