Tunable Hypersonic Resonators via Electron‐Irradiation‐Induced Giant Modulation of Microparticle Elasticity
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The ability to modulate the elastic properties of nanostructured objects is crucial for the development of innovative materials able to control the propagation of acoustic waves (phonons) in the hypersonic frequency regime, with applications ranging from acousto‐ to thermo‐optical devices. Here, an advanced strategy is explored to finely tune the elastic properties of Stöber silica microparticles, commonly used building blocks for phononic materials. Using moderate electron beam energies in a scanning electron microscope, a controlled, huge and rapid particle elasticity tuning is demonstrated, which is investigated by Brillouin light scattering. The findings are interpreted in terms of an irradiation‐induced stiffening of the contacts between the primary nanoparticles composing the Stöber particle, attributable to changes in the silica network through radiolytic processes. The versatile control of the mechanical properties of microparticles, combined with their electret‐like behavior upon charging, offers broad‐spectrum possibilities for coupling phononic properties with external electromagnetic fields, paving the way for innovative phononic materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia Università di Perugia Via A. Pascoli Perugia 06123 Italy
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare ‐ Sez. di Perugia Via A. Pascoli Perugia 06123 Italy
CNR ‐ Istituto Officina dei Materiali (IOM) Unità di Perugia Via A. Pascoli Perugia 06123 Italy
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1260810.1038/nature12608 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.03390210.1103/PhysRevLett.101.033902 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.05550510.1103/PhysRevLett.112.055505 ↗
4. 10.1063/5.004233710.1063/5.0042337 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.19430110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.194301 ↗
6. 10.1002/smsc.20220005210.1002/smsc.202200052 ↗
7. 10.1021/nl904126m10.1021/nl904126m ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c0392310.1021/acs.jpcb.2c03923 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0510110.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05101 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms930910.1038/ncomms9309 ↗
11. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.110.1038/natrevmats.2016.1 ↗
12. 10.1038/nmat172710.1038/nmat1727 ↗
13. 10.1088/1361-665X/aaca5510.1088/1361-665X/aaca55 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apt.2013.09.00910.1016/j.apt.2013.09.009 ↗
15. 10.1002/ppsc.20130030610.1002/ppsc.201300306 ↗
16. 10.1039/c0cp00871k10.1039/c0cp00871k ↗
17. Scarponi F. · Phys. Rev. X · 2017 · 7 · 1
18. 10.1021/jz100774b10.1021/jz100774b ↗
19. 10.1039/c2sm07034k10.1039/c2sm07034k ↗
20. 10.1063/1.175620610.1063/1.1756206 ↗
21. 10.1209/epl/i2002-00470-410.1209/epl/i2002-00470-4 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.21420410.1103/PhysRevB.70.214204 ↗
23. 10.1021/la504210310.1021/la5042103 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0840410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08404 ↗
25. 10.1039/C7NR07540E10.1039/C7NR07540E ↗
26. 10.1002/sca.2026210.1002/sca.20262 ↗
27. Klassen A. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 47 · 6
28. L.Reimer Scanning Electron Microscope‐Physicis of Image Formation and Microanalysis vol.45 Springer‐Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998.10.1007/978-3-540-38967-5 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.32379110.1063/1.323791 ↗
30. 10.1038/s43586-023-00286-z10.1038/s43586-023-00286-z ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.251710.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2517 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.09420110.1103/PhysRevB.78.094201 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.36337910.1063/1.363379 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.33524710.1063/1.335247 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.313710.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3137 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.567410.1103/PhysRevB.57.5674 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.nimb.2006.04.12310.1016/j.nimb.2006.04.123 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2007.05.01010.1016/j.radphyschem.2007.05.010 ↗
39. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01187.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01187.x ↗
40. 10.1080/0950083910821465510.1080/09500839108214655 ↗
41. A significant temperature rise is unlikely given the low current densities and beam energies used here. A thermal analysis [49] suggests that our experimental conditions do not substantially heat the particles and indicates that any temperature rise would be nearly uniform within the particle for all acceleration voltages in contradiction with our experimental results.
42. 10.1063/1.279299510.1063/1.2792995 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.08.02810.1016/j.jcis.2005.08.028 ↗
44. 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/6710.1088/0004-637X/812/1/67 ↗
45. 10.1038/nmat199610.1038/nmat1996 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41563-022-01438-410.1038/s41563-022-01438-4 ↗
47. 10.1002/sca.2000010.1002/sca.20000 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c0032210.1021/acsphotonics.2c00322 ↗
49. 10.1038/ncomms100110.1038/ncomms1001 ↗