Corrigendum to “Plasma‐Engineering of Oxygen Vacancies on NiCo ₂ O ₄ Nanowires with Enhanced Bifunctional Electrocatalytic Performance for Rechargeable Zinc–Air Battery”

Small 2024, 20, 2310660 DOI: 10.1002/smll.202310660 Figure S8b Current version: “As shown in Figure S13 (Supporting Information), the H-NCO-7.5 catalyst presents a higher Cdl of 22.5 mF cm−2 than that of the NCO catalyst (17.0 mF cm−2), and the Ar-NCO-7.5 catalyst (19.8 mF cm−2). Correspondingly, the ECSA values of the samples are illustrated in Figure 5g and the H-NCO-7.5 one also presents the largest ECSA of 563 cm2, indicating its more exposed active sites for oxygen catalytic reactions.” This should be corrected to: “As shown in Figure S13 (Supporting Information), the H-NCO-7.5 catalyst presents a higher Cdl of 225 mF cm−2 than that of the NCO catalyst (170 mF cm−2), and the Ar-NCO-7.5 catalyst (198 mF cm−2). Correspondingly, the ECSA values of the samples are illustrated in Figure 5g and the H-NCO-7.5 one also presents the largest ECSA of 5630 cm2, indicating its more exposed active sites for oxygen catalytic reactions.” Correspondingly, Figure 5g in p. 2310660 (6 of 11) and Figures S13d and S14 (Supporting Information) should be corrected as follows: The ECSA values are ten times large in Figure 5g, due to their line relationship with the Cdl values (ECSA = Cdl/Cs). Figure 5g Color legend with the values of capacity density updated in Figure S13d (Supporting Information): Figure S13d Y-axis values are ten times smaller due to the larger ECSA values in Figure S14 (Supporting Information): Figure S14 These errors do not have any effect on the discussion or conclusions of our article. The authors would apologize for any inconvenience caused.