Fast Scanning Probe Microscopy via Machine Learning: Non‐Rectangular Scans with Compressed Sensing and Gaussian Process Optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Fast scanning probe microscopy enabled via machine learning allows for a broad range of nanoscale, temporally resolved physics to be uncovered. However, such examples for functional imaging are few in number. Here, using piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) as a model application, a factor of 5.8 reduction in data collection using a combination of sparse spiral scanning with compressive sensing and Gaussian process regression reconstruction is demonstrated. It is found that even extremely sparse spiral scans offer strong reconstructions with less than 6% error for Gaussian process regression reconstructions. Further, the error associated with each reconstructive technique per reconstruction iteration is analyzed, finding the error is similar past ≈15 iterations, while at initial iterations Gaussian process regression outperforms compressive sensing. This study highlights the capabilities of reconstruction techniques when applied to sparse data, particularly sparse spiral PFM scans, with broad applications in scanning probe and electron microscopies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Near-Field Optical Microscopy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN 37831 USA
Materials and Manufacturing Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory Wright‐Patterson Air Force Base Dayton OH 45433 USA
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy · Office of Science
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2006.7010.1038/nnano.2006.70 ↗
2. Bonnell D. · 2000
3. 10.1002/adma.20100227010.1002/adma.201002270 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0167-5729(02)00077-810.1016/S0167-5729(02)00077-8 ↗
5. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/13/13570610.1088/0957-4484/23/13/135706 ↗
6. 10.7567/JJAP.51.08KB0810.7567/JJAP.51.08KB08 ↗
7. 10.1088/0022-3727/35/20/32310.1088/0022-3727/35/20/323 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.36593510.1063/1.365935 ↗
9. 10.1088/0957-4484/8/2/00310.1088/0957-4484/8/2/003 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.114740910.1063/1.1147409 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.11186910.1063/1.111869 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.35875810.1063/1.358758 ↗
13. 10.1109/TED.2016.259885510.1109/TED.2016.2598855 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.367244510.1063/1.3672445 ↗
15. 10.1143/JJAP.36.220710.1143/JJAP.36.2207 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.430910.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4309 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.12462810.1063/1.124628 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.151438910.1063/1.1514389 ↗
19. 10.1080/0731517950820593810.1080/07315179508205938 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.11951910.1063/1.119519 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.34734710.1063/1.347347 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.9780010.1063/1.97800 ↗
23. 10.1016/S1367-5931(00)00126-510.1016/S1367-5931(00)00126-5 ↗
24. 10.1073/pnas.070931610410.1073/pnas.0709316104 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.15570310.1103/PhysRevLett.100.155703 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20090010010.1002/adfm.200900100 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.299332710.1063/1.2993327 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0222710.1021/acsnano.5b02227 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.283680210.1063/1.2836802 ↗
30. 10.1021/nn101502x10.1021/nn101502x ↗
31. 10.1039/C7NR08001H10.1039/C7NR08001H ↗
32. 10.1063/1.494394410.1063/1.4943944 ↗
33. 10.1038/nchem.111210.1038/nchem.1112 ↗
34. 10.1017/S143192761801543X10.1017/S143192761801543X ↗
35. 10.1063/1.472552510.1063/1.4725525 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.496572010.1063/1.4965720 ↗
37. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-21310.1186/1556-276X-7-213 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.micron.2017.11.00310.1016/j.micron.2017.11.003 ↗
39. 10.1088/1361-6501/aa7d3110.1088/1361-6501/aa7d31 ↗
40. 10.1088/1361-6501/aaf4e710.1088/1361-6501/aaf4e7 ↗
41. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/25/25570110.1088/0957-4484/20/25/255701 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2004.09.00910.1016/j.ultramic.2004.09.009 ↗
43. 10.1007/s11249-013-0217-810.1007/s11249-013-0217-8 ↗
44. 10.1016/0304-3991(95)00071-810.1016/0304-3991(95)00071-8 ↗
45. 10.1002/smll.20100211610.1002/smll.201002116 ↗
46. 10.1007/s12541-012-0224-y10.1007/s12541-012-0224-y ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.12.00610.1016/j.ultramic.2005.12.006 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00450-610.1016/S0043-1648(00)00450-6 ↗
49. 10.1088/1367-2630/10/1/01301910.1088/1367-2630/10/1/013019 ↗
50. 10.1007/s00339-006-3768-910.1007/s00339-006-3768-9 ↗
51. Tian L. · J. Appl. Lett. · 2008 · 104 · 074110
52. 10.1017/S143192761401134910.1017/S1431927614011349 ↗
53. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05099.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05099.x ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.10.01310.1016/j.ultramic.2018.10.013 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.09.01110.1016/j.ultramic.2016.09.011 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.03.01910.1016/j.ultramic.2018.03.019 ↗
57. Andersson S. B. · 2012 · 248510.1109/ACC.2012.6315406 ↗
58. Yufan L. · 2015 · 350310.1109/ACC.2015.7171873 ↗
59. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/50/50570310.1088/0957-4484/26/50/505703 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.15710.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.157 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.07.01110.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.07.011 ↗
62. 10.1088/1361-6501/ab1d2710.1088/1361-6501/ab1d27 ↗
63. 10.1088/1361-6501/ab5cb110.1088/1361-6501/ab5cb1 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10695110.1016/j.measurement.2019.106951 ↗
65. Liu Y. · 2019 · 138
66. 10.1017/S143192761801543X10.1017/S143192761801543X ↗
67. 10.1038/srep3520610.1038/srep35206 ↗
68. Wilson A. G. · Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2015 · 37 · 1775
69. 10.1038/s41563-019-0532-z10.1038/s41563-019-0532-z ↗
70. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0568210.1021/acsnano.5b05682 ↗
71. 10.1038/ncomms1235710.1038/ncomms12357 ↗
72. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.02440110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.024401 ↗
73. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.911910.1103/PhysRevB.58.9119 ↗
74. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.1086010.1103/PhysRevB.56.10860 ↗
75. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/43/43550310.1088/0957-4484/18/43/435503 ↗
76. 10.1109/TIP.2003.81986110.1109/TIP.2003.819861 ↗
77. 10.1002/adma.20160285210.1002/adma.201602852 ↗
78. Gardner J. · 2018 · 7576