journal article·2020-03Open access

Pore‐Scale Flow Characterization of Polymer Solutions in Microfluidic Porous Media

Christopher A. Browne, Audrey Shih, Sujit S. Datta

Small· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

Abstract Polymer solutions are frequently used in enhanced oil recovery and groundwater remediation to improve the recovery of trapped nonaqueous fluids. However, applications are limited by an incomplete understanding of the flow in porous media. The tortuous pore structure imposes both shear and extension, which elongates polymers; moreover, the flow is often at large Weissenberg numbers, Wi, at which polymer elasticity in turn strongly alters the flow. This dynamic elongation can even produce flow instabilities with strong spatial and temporal fluctuations despite the low Reynolds number, Re. Unfortunately, macroscopic approaches are limited in their ability to characterize the pore‐scale flow. Thus, understanding how polymer conformations, flow dynamics, and pore geometry together determine these nontrivial flow patterns and impact macroscopic transport remains an outstanding challenge. This review describes how microfluidic tools can shed light on the physics underlying the flow of polymer solutions in porous media at high Wi and low Re. Specifically, microfluidic studies elucidate how steady and unsteady flow behavior depends on pore geometry and solution properties, and how polymer‐induced effects impact nonaqueous fluid recovery. This work thus provides new insights for polymer dynamics, non‐Newtonian fluid mechanics, and applications such as enhanced oil recovery and groundwater remediation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Princeton University Princeton NJ 08544 USA

Funding

American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund · National Science Foundation

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Sorbie K. S. · 2013
2. D. S.Roote Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing Ground Water Remediation Technology Analysis Center 1998 http://www.gwrtac.org.
3. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.07.01310.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.07.013 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cjche.2016.08.01210.1016/j.cjche.2016.08.012 ↗
5. 10.1007/s13202-012-0021-210.1007/s13202-012-0021-2 ↗
6. Gbadamosi A. O. · Polym. Bull. · 2019
7. 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.07.00710.1016/j.petrol.2016.07.007 ↗
8. 10.1017/S002211207500232710.1017/S0022112075002327 ↗
9. Wang D. · 2011
10. 10.2118/844-PA10.2118/844-PA ↗
11. 10.2118/27820-PA10.2118/27820-PA ↗
12. 10.1007/s13202-013-0087-510.1007/s13202-013-0087-5 ↗
13. E. C. M.Vermolen M. J. T.Van Haasterecht S. K.Masalmeh inSPE EOR Conf. at Oil and Gas West Asia Society of Petroleum Engineers 2014.
14. 10.2118/174654-PA10.2118/174654-PA ↗
15. Y.Du L.Guan inSPE Int. Petroleum Conf. in Mexico Society of Petroleum Engineers 2004.
16. 10.1007/s00397-003-0306-y10.1007/s00397-003-0306-y ↗
17. 10.1007/s00397-005-0049-z10.1007/s00397-005-0049-z ↗
18. A.Zaitoun N.Kohler inSPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition Society of Petroleum Engineers 1988.
19. A.Zaitoun H.Bertin D.Lasseux inSPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symp. Society of Petroleum Engineers 1998.
20. C.Huh G. A.Pope inSPE Symp on Improved Oil Recovery Society of Petroleum Engineers 2008.
21. 10.1146/annurev.fl.08.010176.00111510.1146/annurev.fl.08.010176.001115 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0036700610.1007/BF00367006 ↗
23. 10.1038/3501101910.1038/35011019 ↗
24. 10.1007/BF0086283510.1007/BF00862835 ↗
25. 10.1039/C5SM01749A10.1039/C5SM01749A ↗
26. 10.1017/978131614509810.1017/9781316145098 ↗
27. 10.1002/aic.69043081710.1002/aic.690430817 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b0003010.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00030 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ces.2017.07.03310.1016/j.ces.2017.07.033 ↗
30. 10.1017/S002211209600399010.1017/S0022112096003990 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.86886710.1063/1.868867 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.86883910.1063/1.868839 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.86920810.1063/1.869208 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00057-210.1016/S0009-2509(97)00057-2 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0730-725X(01)00306-X10.1016/S0730-725X(01)00306-X ↗
36. 10.1146/annurev.fl.19.010187.00110510.1146/annurev.fl.19.010187.001105 ↗
37. 10.1016/0377-0257(88)80023-510.1016/0377-0257(88)80023-5 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.86870410.1063/1.868704 ↗
39. 10.1016/S0377-0257(02)00171-410.1016/S0377-0257(02)00171-4 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.08.00510.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.08.005 ↗
41. T.Urbissinova J. J.Trivedi E.Kuru inSPE Western Regional Meeting Society of Petroleum Engineers 2010.
42. 10.1007/s11242-010-9616-610.1007/s11242-010-9616-6 ↗
43. 10.1098/rsta.2012.032010.1098/rsta.2012.0320 ↗
44. 10.1002/smll.20170357510.1002/smll.201703575 ↗
45. 10.1039/C9SM00300B10.1039/C9SM00300B ↗
46. 10.5334/jors.bl10.5334/jors.bl ↗
47. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.00310.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.003 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2007.02.00610.1016/j.jnnfm.2007.02.006 ↗
49. 10.1007/s00397-013-0712-810.1007/s00397-013-0712-8 ↗
50. 10.1039/C7SM00817A10.1039/C7SM00817A ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2013.09.01110.1016/j.jnnfm.2013.09.011 ↗
52. Graessley W. W. · 2008
53. 10.1016/j.ces.2005.04.03010.1016/j.ces.2005.04.030 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.07450210.1103/PhysRevLett.117.074502 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.495481310.1063/1.4954813 ↗
56. 10.1007/s00397-013-0701-y10.1007/s00397-013-0701-y ↗
57. 10.1017/S002211207100087910.1017/S0022112071000879 ↗
58. 10.1021/ma00110a02110.1021/ma00110a021 ↗
59. 10.1063/1.502657310.1063/1.5026573 ↗
60. 10.1039/C6SM02199A10.1039/C6SM02199A ↗
61. 10.1122/1.54992310.1122/1.549923 ↗
62. 10.1016/0377-0257(88)85030-410.1016/0377-0257(88)85030-4 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0014810.1021/acs.macromol.8b00148 ↗
64. 10.1007/s00397-019-01130-610.1007/s00397-019-01130-6 ↗
65. 10.1122/1.497593310.1122/1.4975933 ↗
66. 10.1063/1.494560410.1063/1.4945604 ↗
67. 10.1039/c1sm05347g10.1039/c1sm05347g ↗
68. Ingremeau F. · Phys. Rev. X · 2013 · 3 · 041002
69. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0175510.1021/acs.macromol.6b01755 ↗
70. 10.1122/1.503349910.1122/1.5033499 ↗
71. Bird R. B. · 1987
72. 10.1016/0032-3861(61)90029-510.1016/0032-3861(61)90029-5 ↗
73. 10.1038/159310a010.1038/159310a0 ↗
74. 10.1039/C5SM01042J10.1039/C5SM01042J ↗
75. Macosko C. W. · 1994
76. Dealy J. M. · Rheol. Bull. · 2010 · 79 · 14
77. Poole R. J. · British Soc. Rheol. Rheol. Bull. · 2012 · 53 · 32
78. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.002 ↗
79. 10.1063/PT.3.397110.1063/PT.3.3971 ↗
80. 10.1080/1091646080265397010.1080/10916460802653970 ↗
81. 10.1021/ma00192a04410.1021/ma00192a044 ↗
82. 10.1051/jphys:019760037012014450010.1051/jphys:0197600370120144500 ↗
83. 10.1006/jcis.2000.730610.1006/jcis.2000.7306 ↗
84. 10.1021/ma034073p10.1021/ma034073p ↗
85. 10.1126/science.108607010.1126/science.1086070 ↗
86. Obey T. M. · 1999 · 51
88. P.Zitha G.Chauveteau A.Zaitoun inSPE Int. Symp. on Oilfield Chemistry Society of Petroleum Engineers 1995.
89. 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2003.tb00675.x10.1111/j.1745-6592.2003.tb00675.x ↗
90. 10.1016/j.petrol.2004.07.00210.1016/j.petrol.2004.07.002 ↗
91. 10.1051/jphyslet:01981004201002010010.1051/jphyslet:019810042010020100 ↗
92. 10.1016/0377-0257(84)85017-X10.1016/0377-0257(84)85017-X ↗
93. 10.1016/j.physa.2004.03.05210.1016/j.physa.2004.03.052 ↗
94. 10.1063/1.87038310.1063/1.870383 ↗
95. 10.1126/science.281.5381.133510.1126/science.281.5381.1335 ↗
96. 10.1016/0377-0257(89)85001-310.1016/0377-0257(89)85001-3 ↗
97. 10.1016/0377-0257(91)80023-D10.1016/0377-0257(91)80023-D ↗
98. 10.1016/0377-0257(94)01290-X10.1016/0377-0257(94)01290-X ↗
99. 10.1006/abio.1993.102010.1006/abio.1993.1020 ↗
100. 10.1021/ma062892e10.1021/ma062892e ↗