journal article·2024-11Open access

Insulated π‐Conjugated Azido Scaffolds for Stepwise Functionalization via Huisgen Cycloaddition on Metal Oxide Surfaces

Qi‐Chun Jiang, Tomohiro Iwai, Morihiro Jo, Takuro Hosomi, Takeshi Yanagida, Ken Uchida, Kazuki Hashimoto, Takashi Nakazono, Yusuke Yamada, Atsushi Kobayashi, Shin‐ya Takizawa, Hiroshi Masai, Jun Terao

Small· Volume 20· Issue 45

Abstract

Abstract In organic−inorganic hybrid devices, fine interfacial controls by organic components directly affect the device performance. However, fabrication of uniformed interfaces using π‐conjugated molecules remains challenging due to facile aggregation by their strong π‐π interaction. In this report, a π‐conjugated scaffold insulated by covalently linked permethylated α‐cyclodextrin moiety with an azido group is synthesized for surface Huisgen cycloaddition on metal oxides. Fourier‐transformed infrared (FT‐IR) spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirm the successful immobilization of the insulated azido scaffold on ZnO nanowire array surfaces. Owing to the highly independent immobilization, the scaffold allows rapid and complete conversion of the surface azido group in Huisgen cycloaddition reactions with ethynyl‐terminated molecules, as confirmed by FT‐IR spectroscopy monitoring. Cyclic voltammetry analysis of modified indium tin oxide substrates shows the positive effects of cyclic insulation toward suppression of intermolecular interaction between molecules introduced by the surface Huisgen cycloaddition reactions. The utility of the scaffold for heterogeneous catalysis is demonstrated in electrocatalytic selective O 2 reduction to H 2 O 2 with cobalt(II) chlorin modified fluorine doped tin oxide electrode and photocatalytic H 2 generation with iridium(III) dye‐sensitized Pt‐loaded TiO 2 nanoparticle. These results highlight the potential of the insulated azido scaffold for a stepwise functionalization process, enabling precise and well‐defined hybrid interfaces.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Basic Science Graduate School of Arts and Sciences The University of Tokyo 3‐8‐1, Komaba Meguro‐ku Tokyo 153‐8902 Japan

Department of Applied Chemistry Graduate School of Engineering The University of Tokyo Bunkyo‐ku Tokyo 113‐8656 Japan

Department of Materials Engineering Graduate School of Engineering The University of Tokyo Bunkyo‐ku Tokyo 113‐8656 Japan

Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering Graduate School of Engineering Osaka Metropolitan University 3‐3‐138 Sugimoto Sumiyoshi Osaka 558‐8585 Japan

Research Center for Artificial Photosynthesis (ReCAP) Osaka Metropolitan University 3‐3‐138 Sugimoto Sumiyoshi Osaka 558‐8585 Japan

Department of Chemistry Faculty of Science Hokkaido University North‐10 West‐8, Kita‐ku Sapporo 060‐0810 Japan

Funding

Izumi Science and Technology Foundation · Toshiaki Ogasawara Memorial Foundation · Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology · Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr900356p10.1021/cr900356p ↗
2. 10.1021/am507334m10.1021/am507334m ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0012710.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00127 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0053210.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00532 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20130434610.1002/adma.201304346 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cis.2011.11.00110.1016/j.cis.2011.11.001 ↗
7. 10.1039/C5CS00781J10.1039/C5CS00781J ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0005610.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00056 ↗
9. 10.1021/ar500022f10.1021/ar500022f ↗
10. 10.1021/ja076210u10.1021/ja076210u ↗
11. 10.1002/chem.20100238110.1002/chem.201002381 ↗
12. 10.1039/D3TA03231K10.1039/D3TA03231K ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20150097210.1002/adma.201500972 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.277.5330.123210.1126/science.277.5330.1232 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20171281610.1002/anie.201712816 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20090716110.1002/anie.200907161 ↗
17. 10.1021/ma070113410.1021/ma0701134 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20070082210.1002/adma.200700822 ↗
19. 10.1039/C2CS35346F10.1039/C2CS35346F ↗
20. 10.1039/c3cs35527f10.1039/c3cs35527f ↗
21. 10.1039/C7TA05632J10.1039/C7TA05632J ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.5b0674310.1021/acsami.5b06743 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.07010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.070 ↗
24. 10.1002/asia.20190098910.1002/asia.201900989 ↗
25. 10.3762/bjnano.7.3410.3762/bjnano.7.34 ↗
26. 10.1002/chem.20170334910.1002/chem.201703349 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja047525210.1021/ja0475252 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0191610.1021/acs.macromol.0c01916 ↗
29. 10.1021/la504130f10.1021/la504130f ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12237310.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122373 ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20230537410.1002/anie.202305374 ↗
32. 10.1002/adfm.20220585510.1002/adfm.202205855 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41467-019-14271-210.1038/s41467-019-14271-2 ↗
34. 10.1039/C5RA26034E10.1039/C5RA26034E ↗
35. 10.1021/cr078347910.1021/cr0783479 ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20130284710.1002/adfm.201302847 ↗
37. 10.1002/chem.20210317510.1002/chem.202103175 ↗
38. 10.1002/chem.20160042910.1002/chem.201600429 ↗
39. 10.1002/asia.20200035010.1002/asia.202000350 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0518010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b05180 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.0c1033210.1021/acsami.0c10332 ↗
42. ZnO nanowire arrays on Si(100) wafers were grown using the hydrothermal method. See the Supporting Information for details (Figure S49).
43. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0061210.1021/acsaem.1c00612 ↗
44. 10.1007/s00339-023-06863-z10.1007/s00339-023-06863-z ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1125810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11258 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0048210.1021/acs.jpcc.0c00482 ↗
47. 10.1039/D1NJ03665C10.1039/D1NJ03665C ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0010610.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00106 ↗
49. 10.1021/la052947q10.1021/la052947q ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.02310.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.023 ↗
51. 10.1021/ja907443710.1021/ja9074437 ↗
52. To gain insight into the insulation effects on the interface electronic properties the variation in the peak‐to‐peak separation potentials with increasing scan rate was determined to construct the trumpet plots usingFc‐6/ITOandFc‐7/ITO. (See Figure S59).
53. 10.1021/ja312199h10.1021/ja312199h ↗
54. 10.1038/ncomms1147010.1038/ncomms11470 ↗
55. 10.1021/ar00072a00310.1021/ar00072a003 ↗
56. 10.1021/cr500008u10.1021/cr500008u ↗
57. 10.1039/B800489G10.1039/B800489G ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.21462410.1016/j.ccr.2022.214624 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b0127910.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01279 ↗
60. 10.3390/en1409242510.3390/en14092425 ↗
61. 10.1038/s41467-019-11099-810.1038/s41467-019-11099-8 ↗
62. The coumarin‐based Ir(III) complex was converted into a structurally unidentified compound by treatment with Me3SiBr/Et3N which were used for dealkylation of the phosphonic acid ester to obtain the corresponding anchor (see Figures S69 and S70).
63. Emission spectroscopic studies ofIr‐6/Pt‐TiO2were conducted. See the Supporting Information for details (Figure S71).