journal article·2023-12Open access

Long‐Range Electron Transport Rates Depend on Wire Dimensions in Cytochrome Nanowires

Martin Kulke, Dayna M. Olson, Jingcheng Huang, David M. Kramer, Josh V. Vermaas

Small· Volume 19· Issue 52

Abstract

Abstract The ability to redirect electron transport to new reactions in living systems opens possibilities to store energy, generate new products, or probe physiological processes. Recent work by Huang et al. showed that 3D crystals of small tetraheme cytochromes (STC) can transport electrons over nanoscopic to mesoscopic distances by an electron hopping mechanism, making them promising materials for nanowires. However, fluctuations at room temperature may distort the nanostructure, hindering efficient electron transport. Classical molecular dynamics simulations of these fluctuations at the nano‐ and mesoscopic scales allowed us to develop a graph network representation to estimate maximum electron flow that can be driven through STC wires. In longer nanowires, transient structural fluctuations at protein‐protein interfaces tended to obstruct efficient electron transfer, but these blockages are ameliorated in thicker crystals where alternative electron transfer pathways become more efficient. The model implies that more flexible proteinprotein interfaces limit the required minimum diameter to carry currents commensurate with conventional electronics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

MSU‐DOE Plant Research Laboratory and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Michigan State University 612 Wilson Rd East Lansing MI 48824 United States of America

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences · National Science Foundation

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20190989010.1002/adfm.201909890 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10433010.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104330 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12274-020-2825-610.1007/s12274-020-2825-6 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0222610.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02226 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0289810.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02898 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.aao675010.1126/science.aao6750 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20180248210.1002/adfm.201802482 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.12.07210.1016/j.bios.2016.12.072 ↗
9. 10.1126/sciadv.170113310.1126/sciadv.1701133 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.07.01410.1016/j.tibtech.2018.07.014 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0180310.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01803 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.14410.1016/j.snb.2016.07.144 ↗
13. 10.1007/s12274-017-1720-210.1007/s12274-017-1720-2 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0007610.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00076 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0042310.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00423 ↗
16. Rizwan M. · 2021 · 3110.1016/B978-0-12-823823-3.00001-X ↗
17. 10.1038/s41565-018-0267-z10.1038/s41565-018-0267-z ↗
18. 10.1038/s41565-017-0041-710.1038/s41565-017-0041-7 ↗
19. 10.1073/pnas.181642811510.1073/pnas.1816428115 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0162610.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01626 ↗
21. 10.1126/sciadv.aav526510.1126/sciadv.aav5265 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-022-32659-510.1038/s41467-022-32659-5 ↗
23. 10.1038/nchem.280810.1038/nchem.2808 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.9b1624910.1021/acsami.9b16249 ↗
25. 10.1021/jacs.7b0808710.1021/jacs.7b08087 ↗
26. 10.1021/nn103531210.1021/nn1035312 ↗
27. 10.1038/nmat120510.1038/nmat1205 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20090365710.1002/adma.200903657 ↗
29. 10.1021/jacs.0c0272910.1021/jacs.0c02729 ↗
30. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0043210.3389/fbioe.2019.00432 ↗
31. 10.1073/pnas.210793911810.1073/pnas.2107939118 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.02910.1016/j.cell.2019.03.029 ↗
33. 10.1073/pnas.211996411910.1073/pnas.2119964119 ↗
34. 10.1002/smll.20160111210.1002/smll.201601112 ↗
35. 10.1073/pnas.131615611110.1073/pnas.1316156111 ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.181800311610.1073/pnas.1818003116 ↗
37. 10.1021/jacs.7b0883110.1021/jacs.7b08831 ↗
38. 10.1021/jacs.9b0685810.1021/jacs.9b06858 ↗
39. 10.1126/sciadv.abm719310.1126/sciadv.abm7193 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0268610.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02686 ↗
41. 10.1073/pnas.100488010710.1073/pnas.1004880107 ↗
42. 10.1146/annurev.pc.15.100164.00110310.1146/annurev.pc.15.100164.001103 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.174272310.1063/1.1742723 ↗
44. 10.1038/355796a010.1038/355796a0 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c0682210.1021/acs.jpcb.2c06822 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.06.00610.1016/j.bbabio.2007.06.006 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41467-017-01361-210.1038/s41467-017-01361-2 ↗
48. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab876710.1088/1361-6528/ab8767 ↗
49. 10.1039/C1FD00098E10.1039/C1FD00098E ↗
50. 10.1039/c2cp41185g10.1039/c2cp41185g ↗
51. 10.1039/D2CP06072H10.1039/D2CP06072H ↗
52. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03696-710.1016/S0014-5793(02)03696-7 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.08.01210.1016/j.mattod.2019.08.012 ↗
54. 10.1002/pro.394310.1002/pro.3943 ↗
55. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-510.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
56. 10.1038/nmeth.406710.1038/nmeth.4067 ↗
57. 10.1063/5.001447510.1063/5.0014475 ↗
58. Allen M. P. · Liq. Oxford Univ. Press. New York · 1987 · 18 · 385
59. 10.1063/1.44586910.1063/1.445869 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.47206110.1063/1.472061 ↗
61. 10.1002/jcc.54013080510.1002/jcc.540130805 ↗
62. 10.1002/andp.1921369030410.1002/andp.19213690304 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.47011710.1063/1.470117 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.362810.1103/PhysRevA.33.3628 ↗
65. 10.1063/1.47064810.1063/1.470648 ↗
66. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-210.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
67. A. A.Hagberg D. A.Schult P. J.Swart inProc. 7th Python Sci. Conf. (Eds.:G.Varoquaux T.Vaught J.Millman) Pasadena CA USA 2008 pp.11–15.10.25080/TCWV9851 ↗
68. 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.1393710.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 ↗
69. 10.1073/pnas.71.9.364010.1073/pnas.71.9.3640 ↗
70. 10.1038/4697210.1038/46972 ↗
71. 10.1145/48014.6105110.1145/48014.61051 ↗