Long‐Range Electron Transport Rates Depend on Wire Dimensions in Cytochrome Nanowires
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The ability to redirect electron transport to new reactions in living systems opens possibilities to store energy, generate new products, or probe physiological processes. Recent work by Huang et al. showed that 3D crystals of small tetraheme cytochromes (STC) can transport electrons over nanoscopic to mesoscopic distances by an electron hopping mechanism, making them promising materials for nanowires. However, fluctuations at room temperature may distort the nanostructure, hindering efficient electron transport. Classical molecular dynamics simulations of these fluctuations at the nano‐ and mesoscopic scales allowed us to develop a graph network representation to estimate maximum electron flow that can be driven through STC wires. In longer nanowires, transient structural fluctuations at protein‐protein interfaces tended to obstruct efficient electron transfer, but these blockages are ameliorated in thicker crystals where alternative electron transfer pathways become more efficient. The model implies that more flexible proteinprotein interfaces limit the required minimum diameter to carry currents commensurate with conventional electronics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
MSU‐DOE Plant Research Laboratory and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Michigan State University 612 Wilson Rd East Lansing MI 48824 United States of America
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences · National Science Foundation
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20190989010.1002/adfm.201909890 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10433010.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104330 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12274-020-2825-610.1007/s12274-020-2825-6 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0222610.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02226 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0289810.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02898 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.aao675010.1126/science.aao6750 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20180248210.1002/adfm.201802482 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.12.07210.1016/j.bios.2016.12.072 ↗
9. 10.1126/sciadv.170113310.1126/sciadv.1701133 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.07.01410.1016/j.tibtech.2018.07.014 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0180310.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01803 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.14410.1016/j.snb.2016.07.144 ↗
13. 10.1007/s12274-017-1720-210.1007/s12274-017-1720-2 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0007610.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00076 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0042310.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00423 ↗
16. Rizwan M. · 2021 · 3110.1016/B978-0-12-823823-3.00001-X ↗
17. 10.1038/s41565-018-0267-z10.1038/s41565-018-0267-z ↗
18. 10.1038/s41565-017-0041-710.1038/s41565-017-0041-7 ↗
19. 10.1073/pnas.181642811510.1073/pnas.1816428115 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0162610.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01626 ↗
21. 10.1126/sciadv.aav526510.1126/sciadv.aav5265 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-022-32659-510.1038/s41467-022-32659-5 ↗
23. 10.1038/nchem.280810.1038/nchem.2808 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.9b1624910.1021/acsami.9b16249 ↗
25. 10.1021/jacs.7b0808710.1021/jacs.7b08087 ↗
26. 10.1021/nn103531210.1021/nn1035312 ↗
27. 10.1038/nmat120510.1038/nmat1205 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20090365710.1002/adma.200903657 ↗
29. 10.1021/jacs.0c0272910.1021/jacs.0c02729 ↗
30. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0043210.3389/fbioe.2019.00432 ↗
31. 10.1073/pnas.210793911810.1073/pnas.2107939118 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.02910.1016/j.cell.2019.03.029 ↗
33. 10.1073/pnas.211996411910.1073/pnas.2119964119 ↗
34. 10.1002/smll.20160111210.1002/smll.201601112 ↗
35. 10.1073/pnas.131615611110.1073/pnas.1316156111 ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.181800311610.1073/pnas.1818003116 ↗
37. 10.1021/jacs.7b0883110.1021/jacs.7b08831 ↗
38. 10.1021/jacs.9b0685810.1021/jacs.9b06858 ↗
39. 10.1126/sciadv.abm719310.1126/sciadv.abm7193 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0268610.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02686 ↗
41. 10.1073/pnas.100488010710.1073/pnas.1004880107 ↗
42. 10.1146/annurev.pc.15.100164.00110310.1146/annurev.pc.15.100164.001103 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.174272310.1063/1.1742723 ↗
44. 10.1038/355796a010.1038/355796a0 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c0682210.1021/acs.jpcb.2c06822 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.06.00610.1016/j.bbabio.2007.06.006 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41467-017-01361-210.1038/s41467-017-01361-2 ↗
48. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab876710.1088/1361-6528/ab8767 ↗
49. 10.1039/C1FD00098E10.1039/C1FD00098E ↗
50. 10.1039/c2cp41185g10.1039/c2cp41185g ↗
51. 10.1039/D2CP06072H10.1039/D2CP06072H ↗
52. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03696-710.1016/S0014-5793(02)03696-7 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.08.01210.1016/j.mattod.2019.08.012 ↗
54. 10.1002/pro.394310.1002/pro.3943 ↗
55. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-510.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
56. 10.1038/nmeth.406710.1038/nmeth.4067 ↗
57. 10.1063/5.001447510.1063/5.0014475 ↗
58. Allen M. P. · Liq. Oxford Univ. Press. New York · 1987 · 18 · 385
59. 10.1063/1.44586910.1063/1.445869 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.47206110.1063/1.472061 ↗
61. 10.1002/jcc.54013080510.1002/jcc.540130805 ↗
62. 10.1002/andp.1921369030410.1002/andp.19213690304 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.47011710.1063/1.470117 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.362810.1103/PhysRevA.33.3628 ↗
65. 10.1063/1.47064810.1063/1.470648 ↗
66. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-210.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
67. A. A.Hagberg D. A.Schult P. J.Swart inProc. 7th Python Sci. Conf. (Eds.:G.Varoquaux T.Vaught J.Millman) Pasadena CA USA 2008 pp.11–15.10.25080/TCWV9851 ↗
68. 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.1393710.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 ↗
69. 10.1073/pnas.71.9.364010.1073/pnas.71.9.3640 ↗
70. 10.1038/4697210.1038/46972 ↗
71. 10.1145/48014.6105110.1145/48014.61051 ↗