journal article·2009-01-19

Layer‐By‐Layer Electropeeling of Organic Conducting Material Imaged In Real Time

Carmen Munuera, Josep Puigmartí‐Luis, Markos Paradinas, Luis Garzón, David B. Amabilino, Carmen Ocal

Small· Volume 5· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Soft materials comprising low‐molecular‐weight organic molecules are attracting increasing interest because of their importance in the development of a number of emerging areas in nanoscience and technology, including molecular electronics, nanosystems for energy conversion, and devices in the widest sense. Their interaction with electrodes and their behavior under electric fields is a topic of vital significance for these areas, and about which very little is known. Here unprecedented evidence is presented for the controlled peeling of organic molecular material when a voltage is applied between the conducting system and the conducting probe of a scanning force microscope. The rate of removal of the material from the surface of the bulk conducting supramolecular material can be tuned. It depends on the potential applied and is initiated only above a threshold value of 200 mV. The results indicate the importance of electric fields on the stability and performance of conducting organic systems at the nanoscale.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/1521-4095(20020116)14:2<99::AID-ADMA99>3.0.CO;2-910.1002/1521-4095(20020116)14:2<99::AID-ADMA99>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70018-410.1016/S1369-7021(07)70018-4 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20070079610.1002/adfm.200700796 ↗
4. 10.1021/ja990230h10.1021/ja990230h ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.312810.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3128 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.23680210.1103/PhysRevLett.94.236802 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat92610.1038/nmat926 ↗
8. 10.1021/la061817u10.1021/la061817u ↗
9. 10.1021/la052812k10.1021/la052812k ↗
10. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2005.07.28210.1016/j.synthmet.2005.07.282 ↗
11. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990517)38:10<1393::AID-ANIE1393>3.0.CO;2-H10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990517)38:10<1393::AID-ANIE1393>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
12. 10.1021/ja055203810.1021/ja0552038 ↗
13. 10.1021/ja055800u10.1021/ja055800u ↗
14. 10.1021/ja053496z10.1021/ja053496z ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20060248310.1002/anie.200602483 ↗
16. 10.1039/b716533a10.1039/b716533a ↗
17. 10.1007/s00339-002-1465-x10.1007/s00339-002-1465-x ↗
18. 10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00911-110.1016/S0375-9601(99)00911-1 ↗
19. 10.1021/la000249u10.1021/la000249u ↗
20. The z‐axis error signal values supplied by the SFM feedback when imaging at constant applied load mimic the topographic derivative thus providing an excellent way to correlate the electric field effect with changes observed in the surface relief.
21. The electropeeling process has also been observed at negative tip voltages. However the threshold or BD onset value appears to be lower for positive than for negative tip voltages. This is an additional support to rule out the sweeping effect of the SFM tip.
22. 10.1016/S0379-6779(00)01129-210.1016/S0379-6779(00)01129-2 ↗
23. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/12/12550510.1088/0957-4484/18/12/125505 ↗
24. Farges J.‐F. · 1994
25. Indentation experiments at different tip–sample bias will be presented in a forthcoming paper.
26. 10.1126/science.105878210.1126/science.1058782 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.243241010.1063/1.2432410 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.219819510.1063/1.2198195 ↗