Correlation between Anisotropy and Lattice Distortions in Single Crystal Calcite Nanowires Grown in Confinement
Source abstract
Abstract
Growing nanostructures in confinement allows for the control of their shape, size and structure, as required in many technological applications. We investigated the crystal structure and morphology of calcite nanowires, precipitated in the pores of track‐etch membranes, by employing transmission electron microscopy and selected area electron diffraction (SAED). The data showed that the nanowires show no preferred growth orientation and that the crystallographic orientation rotated along the length of the nanowire, with lattice rotation angles of several degrees per micrometer. Finite element calculations indicated that the rotation is caused by the anisotropic crystallographic nature of the calcite mineral, the nanoscale diameter of the wires and the confined space provided by the membrane pore. This phenomenon should also be observed in other single crystal nanowires made from anisotropic materials, which could offer the potential of generating nanostructures with tailored optical, electronic and mechanical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Electrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics University of York Heslington York YO10 5DD United Kingdom
Physics and Astronomy University College London London WC1E 6BT United Kingdom
School of Chemistry University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT United Kingdom
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/chem.20050098010.1002/chem.200500980 ↗
2. 10.1093/oso/9780195049770.001.000110.1093/oso/9780195049770.001.0001 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20090061510.1002/adma.200900615 ↗
4. 10.1021/cm062064010.1021/cm0620640 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.243399910.1063/1.2433999 ↗
6. 10.1021/nl070508110.1021/nl0705081 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.02.00310.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.02.003 ↗
8. 10.1557/PROC-255-17110.1557/PROC-255-171 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20100024810.1002/adfm.201000248 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.115713110.1126/science.1157131 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.172123410.1063/1.1721234 ↗
12. 10.1038/nnano.2008.17910.1038/nnano.2008.179 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20110440710.1002/anie.201104407 ↗
14. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/8/02010.1088/0957-4484/17/8/020 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-3-642-02525-9_410.1007/978-3-642-02525-9_4 ↗
16. Stadelmann P. · 1999
17. 10.1063/1.353044110.1063/1.3530441 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.292822110.1063/1.2928221 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.00910.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.009 ↗
20. 10.1021/nl048456s10.1021/nl048456s ↗
21. 10.1063/1.477264910.1063/1.4772649 ↗
22. 10.1088/0034-4885/64/5/20110.1088/0034-4885/64/5/201 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.03.00810.1016/j.jsb.2006.03.008 ↗
24. 10.1021/cm403497g10.1021/cm403497g ↗
25. 10.1021/nn303747c10.1021/nn303747c ↗
26. 10.1088/0953-8984/16/25/R0110.1088/0953-8984/16/25/R01 ↗