journal article·2026-04

Palladium‐Conductive Metal Organic Framework Interaction Enhances the Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution in Acidic Electrolyte

Jinna Wang, Junfeng Zeng, Hongli Zhu, Heng Chu, Xinsheng Zhang, Hussein A. Younus, Yan Zhang, Wenpeng Ni, Shiguo Zhang

Small· Volume 22· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Strong metal–metal‐organic framework (MOF) interactions can markedly enhance electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution, yet the intrinsically poor conductivity of most MOFs constrains their performance. Here, we employ a conductive 2,3,6,7,10,11‐hexaaminotriphenylene (HITP)‐based MOF to anchor sub‐5 nm Pd nanoparticles (<1.1 wt.%). The metal‐node‐ and ligand‐dependent interfacial interaction between Pd and M‐HITP (M = Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn) endows Pd/M‐HITP with markedly higher intrinsic activity than the pristine MOFs. Among the resulting hybrids, Pd/Fe‐HITP exhibits outstanding activity, requiring only 15 mV to reach −10 mA cm − 2 and maintaining stability for over 100 h. Morphology modulation to Fe‐HITP nanosheets further reduces overpotentials to 9 and 74 mV at −10 and −100 mA cm − 2 , respectively, by mitigating mass transport limitations. Density functional theory calculations reveal that Fe sites, rather than Pd, serve as the true active centers, with the Pd–Fe‐HITP interaction upshifting the Fe d‐band center, enhancing *H adsorption, and lowering the free energy barrier to 0.044 eV. This work highlights conductive MOFs as promising platforms for interfacial design in advanced electrocatalysts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Materials Science and Engineering Hunan University Changsha China

Chemistry Department Faculty of Science Fayoum University Fayoum Egypt

Nanotechnology Research Center Sultan Qaboos University Muscat Oman

Research Institute of Hunan University in Chongqing Chongqing China

Greater Bay Area Institute for Innovation Hunan University Guangzhou China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20230610810.1002/adma.202306108 ↗
2. 10.1002/cnl2.910.1002/cnl2.9 ↗
3. 10.1039/D4CS00333K10.1039/D4CS00333K ↗
4. 10.1002/advs.20210513510.1002/advs.202105135 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c0071210.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00712 ↗
6. 10.1039/D4CS00527A10.1039/D4CS00527A ↗
7. 10.1039/D2TA10036C10.1039/D2TA10036C ↗
8. 10.1038/s41929‐019‐0364‐x10.1038/s41929‐019‐0364‐x ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c0505610.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c05056 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c0316910.1021/acs.chemmater.3c03169 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.07.00510.1016/j.chempr.2016.07.005 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsanm.4c0550810.1021/acsanm.4c05508 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.06.01610.1016/j.chempr.2019.06.016 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.07310.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.073 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12173010.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121730 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20211037410.1002/anie.202110374 ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20230222010.1002/anie.202302220 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.1c0600610.1021/jacs.1c06006 ↗
19. 10.1002/smll.20230520110.1002/smll.202305201 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.09.19410.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.09.194 ↗
21. 10.1002/advs.20240178010.1002/advs.202401780 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0272910.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02729 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14760110.1016/j.cej.2023.147601 ↗
24. 10.26599/NR.2025.9490741010.26599/NR.2025.94907410 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0845810.1021/acsnano.9b08458 ↗
26. 10.1038/s44160‐024‐00603‐810.1038/s44160‐024‐00603‐8 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0044610.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00446 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13324710.1016/j.cej.2021.133247 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0401410.1021/acs.nanolett.4c04014 ↗
30. 10.1021/ja502765n10.1021/ja502765n ↗
31. 10.1039/D3SE01459B10.1039/D3SE01459B ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.05910.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.059 ↗
33. 10.1039/D5NR03073K10.1039/D5NR03073K ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16544710.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165447 ↗
35. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0248510.1021/acscatal.5b02485 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.11216910.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112169 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.8b0542710.1021/acsami.8b05427 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.13916610.1016/j.jcis.2025.139166 ↗
39. Atomic Layer Deposition of PdRu X Alloy Nanoparticles for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Electrocatalysis in Acidic Media
40. 10.1002/adma.20242017310.1002/adma.202420173 ↗
41. 10.1039/C8NR10536G10.1039/C8NR10536G ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17783410.1016/j.jallcom.2024.177834 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15587010.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155870 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.04210.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.042 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c0457710.1021/acs.langmuir.4c04577 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c0277310.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c02773 ↗
47. 10.1039/D5NR00550G10.1039/D5NR00550G ↗
48. MOF‐Derived ZrS2/ZrO2 Nanosheet Arrays Enable Cationic Modulation for Low‐Overpotential Electrocatalytic Overall Water Splitting
49. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.03.01910.1016/j.jcis.2023.03.019 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsami.3c0106110.1021/acsami.3c01061 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16299110.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162991 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14795210.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147952 ↗
53. 10.1039/D3DT01150J10.1039/D3DT01150J ↗
54. 10.1002/adfm.20221032210.1002/adfm.202210322 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.02.07310.1016/j.jcis.2022.02.073 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.02810.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.028 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0085010.1021/acsanm.1c00850 ↗
58. 10.1021/jacs.5b0268810.1021/jacs.5b02688 ↗
59. 10.1039/D5TA07816D10.1039/D5TA07816D ↗
60. 10.1021/acsami.5c0256110.1021/acsami.5c02561 ↗