Tunable Morphological Engineering of Self‐Assembled Copper‐Glutathione Nanoarchitectures: Size‐Dependent Antibacterial Action for Pathogen Infections Management
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The urgent need for sustainable agrochemicals motivates intelligent nanoagrochemical development. This study addresses the challenges in size control of nanomaterials by fabricating size‐tunable Cu‐GSH nanocapsules (CG) via a cost‐effective co‐precipitation method using copper‐based nanoparticles and glutathione (GSH). In in vivo experiments on kiwifruit, the optimized CG achieved 77% therapeutic efficacy and 66% protective efficacy—surpassing conventional copper nanoparticles and thiodiazole copper (54%)—while reducing toxicity. Morphology dictates function: smaller spheres (e.g., Cu 4 (OH) 6 Cl 2 /GSH, 77%) enabled plant‐internal therapy, while sheet‐like structures (e.g., Cu 3 (PO 4 ) 2 , 63%) enhanced surface protection. Size refinement within spherical variants boosted therapeutic activity by 1.19‐fold over larger counterparts. Enhanced antibacterial effects arose from reactive oxygen species (ROS)‐mediated membrane damage via engineered structures. CG's tunable cavity further allows pesticide encapsulation or multifunctional composite formation, expanding sustainable disease management applications. This work demonstrates that morphological/dimensional control critically balances pesticide performance, environmental safety, and versatility, establishing a size‐dependent design framework for high‐efficacy, eco‐friendly nanopesticides.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticides Center For R&D of Fine Chemicals of Guizhou University Guiyang China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acssynbio.2c0067110.1021/acssynbio.2c00671 ↗
2. 10.1080/10643389.2020.183543810.1080/10643389.2020.1835438 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12436610.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124366 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0113110.1021/acs.est.9b01131 ↗
5. 10.1007/s13593‐018‐0503‐910.1007/s13593‐018‐0503‐9 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.14638310.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146383 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cis.2024.10326510.1016/j.cis.2024.103265 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.02.00410.1016/j.jmst.2016.02.004 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.10790510.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.107905 ↗
10. 10.1039/D0TB00099J10.1039/D0TB00099J ↗
11. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.02610.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.026 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0203510.1021/acsnano.7b02035 ↗
13. 10.1039/C8TB00549D10.1039/C8TB00549D ↗
14. 10.1007/s10311‐022‐01548‐010.1007/s10311‐022‐01548‐0 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.11308810.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113088 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.2c0711310.1021/acsami.2c07113 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scib.2025.08.01810.1016/j.scib.2025.08.018 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.4c1723710.1021/acsami.4c17237 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.01910.1016/j.envres.2015.02.019 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.envres.2023.11594110.1016/j.envres.2023.115941 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15118710.1016/j.cej.2024.151187 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12469910.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124699 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.14010.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.140 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsagscitech.1c0010210.1021/acsagscitech.1c00102 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11356‐024‐33070‐x10.1007/s11356‐024‐33070‐x ↗
26. 10.3390/ijms2411967310.3390/ijms24119673 ↗
27. 10.1071/EN1827910.1071/EN18279 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0980310.1021/acsnano.4c09803 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.12.02210.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.12.022 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41598‐019‐54717‐710.1038/s41598‐019‐54717‐7 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.06.01410.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.06.014 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0420710.1021/acsnano.6b04207 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.25010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.250 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.10258110.1016/j.ifset.2020.102581 ↗
35. 10.1155/2018/547081410.1155/2018/5470814 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.8b2186210.1021/acsami.8b21862 ↗
37. 10.1002/aoc.558710.1002/aoc.5587 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.10837010.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108370 ↗
39. 10.1186/s12951‐024‐02371‐110.1186/s12951‐024‐02371‐1 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.watres.2024.12282610.1016/j.watres.2024.122826 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2015.08.00510.1016/j.jinorgbio.2015.08.005 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c0167810.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01678 ↗
43. Comprehensive Chemical‐Toxicological Research of Copper(Ii) Sulfate Solutions Containing Reduced Glutathione
44. 10.3390/antibiotics1107089110.3390/antibiotics11070891 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.elspec.2019.06.01010.1016/j.elspec.2019.06.010 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.07510.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.075 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1045210.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10452 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.02410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.024 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.13318710.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133187 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.05.03510.1016/j.indcrop.2018.05.035 ↗
51. 10.1007/s11099‐005‐0058‐210.1007/s11099‐005‐0058‐2 ↗
52. 10.1590/S1677‐0420200500010001210.1590/S1677‐04202005000100012 ↗
53. 10.1007/s13593‐018‐0503‐910.1007/s13593‐018‐0503‐9 ↗
54. The Early History of Copper Fungicides
55. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.01110.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.011 ↗
56. Alexis Millardet: France's Forgotten Mycologist
57. 10.1007/s00244990045110.1007/s002449900451 ↗
58. 10.1097/00010694‐199303000‐0000710.1097/00010694‐199303000‐00007 ↗
59. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.1510.1038/nrmicro.2017.15 ↗
60. 10.1146/annurev‐phyto‐080417‐04594610.1146/annurev‐phyto‐080417‐045946 ↗
61. Study on the Subchronic Oral Toxicity of Bismerthiazol On Rats
62. 10.1002/ps.408010.1002/ps.4080 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.11054410.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110544 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14604110.1016/j.cej.2023.146041 ↗
65. 10.1039/D0NR04645K10.1039/D0NR04645K ↗
66. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.05.02710.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.05.027 ↗