journal article·2026-02Open access

Proteomic Profiling of Alveolar Macrophages Identifies Loss of Lysosomal Content as an Indicator of Nanofiber‐Induced Frustrated Phagocytosis

Tobias Stobernack, Antje Vennemann, Carla Ribalta, Julia Schendel, Oliver Gräb, Rico Ledwith, Mario Pink, Andrea Haase, Martin Wiemann, Verónica I. Dumit

Small· Volume 22· Issue 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT Toxicological research on inhalable fibers, such as asbestos, has identified material morphology (i.e., length and diameter) and bio‐persistence as drivers of adverse health effects (e.g., fibrosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma). Although nanofibers may meet these criteria, their small diameters may enable them to adopt different shapes, affecting their toxicity. While nanofiber pathogenicity is still assessed using animal models, the development of alternative in vitro methods relies on a mechanistic understanding of toxicity. Here, we address nanofiber‐induced protein changes in alveolar macrophages by analyzing whole cell lysates and supernatants of NR8383 cells exposed to silicon carbide nanofibers, Mitsui‐7 carbon nanotubes, and Printex‐90. While all materials elicited a similar dose‐dependent cytotoxicity, there was a nanofiber‐specific release of TNF‐α and glucuronidase. Proteomic profiling after treatment with low, non‐cytotoxic concentrations confirmed the inflammatory response and revealed a release of 20 lysosomal, luminal hydrolases, including six cathepsins, into the extracellular supernatant. In cell lysates, these hydrolases were decreased, while membrane‐associated lysosomal proteins remained unchanged, suggesting that macrophages engulfing long nanofibers release lysosomal content from open membrane pouches during frustrated phagocytosis. Additionally, 17 biomarkers of nanofiber‐induced toxicity were identified as potential targets for predictive, animal‐free screening. These early markers may be of value for assessing nanofiber toxicity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Product Safety German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) Berlin Germany

IBE R&D Institute for Lung Health gGmbH Münster Germany

Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) Materials and Particulate Hazardous Substances Berlin Germany

University of the Western Cape (UWC) Department of Chemical Sciences Bellville South Africa

Freie Universität Berlin Institute of Pharmacy Berlin Germany

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung · Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung · Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.002 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11664‐022‐09516‐810.1007/s11664‐022‐09516‐8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mser.2016.08.00210.1016/j.mser.2016.08.002 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11051‐005‐9026‐910.1007/s11051‐005‐9026‐9 ↗
5. 10.1093/jnci/48.3.79710.1093/jnci/48.3.797 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0059337010.1007/BF00593370 ↗
7. World Health Organization Determination of Airborne Fibre Number Concentrations: a Recommended Method by Phase‐contrast Optical Microscopy (membrane filter method). (9241544961). World Health Organization (accessed 07 August 2025) https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/41904.
8. 10.1006/enrs.2001.423410.1006/enrs.2001.4234 ↗
9. 10.1002/path.171168021410.1002/path.1711680214 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.02.04010.1016/j.ajpath.2011.02.040 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.06.01210.1016/j.tiv.2015.06.012 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.envres.2022.11458010.1016/j.envres.2022.114580 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.taap.2018.06.02710.1016/j.taap.2018.06.027 ↗
14. BAuA Proposal for Harmonised Classification and Labelling Multi‐Walled Carbon Tubes (synthetic graphite in tubular shape) With a Geometric Tube Diameter Range ≥ 30 Nm to < 3 µm and a Length ≥ 5 µm and Aspect Ratio ≥ 3:1 Including Multi‐Walled Carbon Nanotubes MWC(N)T (European Chemical Agency (ECHA) (2.0) 2021):1–111 https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/e55d14a1‐40d0‐2e39‐5613‐0577ceab3a10.
15. 10.1093/toxsci/kfp24710.1093/toxsci/kfp247 ↗
16. 10.1186/s12989‐016‐0164‐210.1186/s12989‐016‐0164‐2 ↗
17. 10.1186/s12989‐019‐0318‐010.1186/s12989‐019‐0318‐0 ↗
18. 10.1089/aivt.2017.003310.1089/aivt.2017.0033 ↗
19. 10.1038/sj.bjc.660564210.1038/sj.bjc.6605642 ↗
20. European Commission Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic‐Free Environment(accessed 07 August 2025) https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/41904.
21. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2024.07.15310.1016/j.toxlet.2024.07.153 ↗
22. 10.1186/s12989‐020‐00344‐410.1186/s12989‐020‐00344‐4 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.envres.2022.11465010.1016/j.envres.2022.114650 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.09.00910.1016/j.yrtph.2014.09.009 ↗
25. S.Halappanavar M.Sharma S.Solorio‐Rodriguez et al. “Substance Interaction With the Pulmonary Resident Cell Membrane Components Leading to Pulmonary Fibrosis ” OECD Series on Adverse Outcome Pathways No. 33 OECD Publishing Paris (2023) https://doi.org/10.1787/10372cb8‐en.
26. Seidel C. · 2023
27. Mansour N. K. · 2023
28. 10.1016/j.nantod.2022.10173510.1016/j.nantod.2022.101735 ↗
29. 10.1002/advs.20230626810.1002/advs.202306268 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.nantod.2025.10281210.1016/j.nantod.2025.102812 ↗
31. 10.1186/1743‐8977‐9‐3410.1186/1743‐8977‐9‐34 ↗
32. 10.3109/17435390.2011.58790210.3109/17435390.2011.587902 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.tox.2009.10.01710.1016/j.tox.2009.10.017 ↗
34. InnoMat.Life Innovative Materialien und neue Produktionsverfahren: Sicherheit im Lebenszyklus und der industriellen Wertschöpfung (accessed November 2025) https://nanopartikel.info/forschung/projekte/innomat‐life/.
35. R.GrallandS.Chevillard NANoREG D507 SOP 04 SOP for Dispersion(accessed November 2025) https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2018‐11/NANoREG%20D5.07%20SOP%2001%20SOP%20for%20Dispersion.pdf.
36. 10.1186/s12951‐016‐0164‐210.1186/s12951‐016‐0164‐2 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.06.00210.1016/j.csbj.2025.06.002 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2010.03.02410.1016/j.jpcs.2010.03.024 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.03010.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.030 ↗
40. R. F.Life Silicon Carbide Raman Spectrum(accessed 06 August 2025) https://ramanlife.com/library/silicon‐carbide/.
41. 10.1002/smtd.20240042010.1002/smtd.202400420 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00204‐021‐03032‐010.1007/s00204‐021‐03032‐0 ↗
43. 10.3390/biomedicines1106164310.3390/biomedicines11061643 ↗
44. 10.1007/s00204‐006‐0164‐310.1007/s00204‐006‐0164‐3 ↗
45. 10.1186/1743‐8977‐9‐510.1186/1743‐8977‐9‐5 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.crtox.2021.01.00510.1016/j.crtox.2021.01.005 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.07.02310.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.07.023 ↗
48. 10.1186/s13321‐023‐00710‐210.1186/s13321‐023‐00710‐2 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.impact.2021.10031410.1016/j.impact.2021.100314 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.impact.2016.08.00210.1016/j.impact.2016.08.002 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.gendis.2023.01.00910.1016/j.gendis.2023.01.009 ↗
52. 10.1038/cmi.2015.9510.1038/cmi.2015.95 ↗
53. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.0142710.3389/fimmu.2018.01427 ↗
54. 10.3390/ijms2013332810.3390/ijms20133328 ↗
55. 10.1186/s12989‐016‐0162‐410.1186/s12989‐016‐0162‐4 ↗
56. 10.1093/nar/gkac96310.1093/nar/gkac963 ↗
57. 10.1093/nar/28.1.2710.1093/nar/28.1.27 ↗
58. 10.1002/pro.371510.1002/pro.3715 ↗
59. 10.1093/emboj/cdg00210.1093/emboj/cdg002 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.01810.1016/j.cell.2005.08.018 ↗
61. 10.1111/tra.1271210.1111/tra.12712 ↗
62. 10.1091/mbc.9.4.80910.1091/mbc.9.4.809 ↗
63. 10.1038/s41598-025-15423-910.1038/s41598-025-15423-9 ↗
64. 10.1080/17435390.2021.198817110.1080/17435390.2021.1988171 ↗
65. 10.18632/oncotarget.516310.18632/oncotarget.5163 ↗
66. 10.1083/jcb.20130409510.1083/jcb.201304095 ↗
67. 10.1007/s13346‐022‐01128‐310.1007/s13346‐022‐01128‐3 ↗
68. 10.1093/toxsci/kfp04610.1093/toxsci/kfp046 ↗
69. 10.1038/nbt.151110.1038/nbt.1511 ↗
70. 10.1038/nprot.2016.13610.1038/nprot.2016.136 ↗
71. 10.1093/nar/gkac100010.1093/nar/gkac1000 ↗