Volumetric Single‐Molecule Tracking Inside Subcellular Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The non‐covalent interactions that underpin major cellular functions depend on molecular motion within 3D environments. Large depth‐of‐field single‐molecule localization microscopy (3D‐SMLM) methods facilitate these measurements, but their increased optical complexity and bespoke post‐processing pipelines often sacrifice important cellular context. Here, we combine single‐molecule light‐field microscopy (SMLFM) with widefield Fourier light‐field microscopy for correlative volumetric organelle imaging. The instantaneous acquisition of subcellular volumes improves the sensitivity of molecular organization, chemical environment, and diffusion measurements through the use of volumetric sub‐cellular segmentation. We first demonstrate our approach by measuring the molecular organization of a nuclear‐localized HaloTag protein relative to cell nuclei. Next, we characterize the molecular diffusion of the soluble protein, calreticulin, in the context of ‐antitrypsin deficiency, which revealed an increase in heterogeneous motion within endoplasmic reticulum inclusions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Near-Field Optical Microscopy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, Lensfield Road University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
Cambridge Institute for Medical Research University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Francis Crick Avenue Cambridge UK
Funding
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council · Royal Society · Medical Research Council · Alpha-1 Foundation
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmeth92910.1038/nmeth929 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.112734410.1126/science.1127344 ↗
3. 10.1529/biophysj.106.09111610.1529/biophysj.106.091116 ↗
4. 10.1038/s43586‐021‐00038‐x10.1038/s43586‐021‐00038‐x ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0062910.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00629 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.02.02310.1016/j.bpj.2017.02.023 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41594‐023‐01095‐410.1038/s41594‐023‐01095‐4 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41377‐023‐01085‐710.1038/s41377‐023‐01085‐7 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.115352910.1126/science.1153529 ↗
10. 10.1364/oe.16.00348410.1364/oe.16.003484 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.090024510610.1073/pnas.0900245106 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.13390210.1103/PhysRevLett.113.133902 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0139610.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01396 ↗
14. 10.1364/OPTICA.39717210.1364/OPTICA.397172 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467‐024‐45828‐510.1038/s41467‐024‐45828‐5 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0006‐3495(02)75393‐910.1016/S0006‐3495(02)75393‐9 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467‐023‐40065‐810.1038/s41467‐023‐40065‐8 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41556‐018‐0192‐210.1038/s41556‐018‐0192‐2 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.108439810.1126/science.1084398 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.00710.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.007 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41598‐021‐88802‐710.1038/s41598‐021‐88802‐7 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41592‐020‐0918‐510.1038/s41592‐020‐0918‐5 ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20220691910.1002/anie.202206919 ↗
24. 10.1038/ncomms887410.1038/ncomms8874 ↗
25. 10.1038/mt.2011.10210.1038/mt.2011.102 ↗
26. 10.1364/OE.27.02557310.1364/OE.27.025573 ↗
27. 10.1364/OPTICA.41923610.1364/OPTICA.419236 ↗
28. 10.1364/AO.45372310.1364/AO.453723 ↗
29. 10.7554/eLife.0223010.7554/eLife.02230 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.10354010.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103540 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41580‐022‐00524‐410.1038/s41580‐022‐00524‐4 ↗
32. 10.1038/s43586‐024‐00341‐310.1038/s43586‐024‐00341‐3 ↗
33. 10.1096/fj.201600430R10.1096/fj.201600430R ↗
34. 10.1126/sciadv.abm209410.1126/sciadv.abm2094 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.04.00110.1016/j.semcdb.2020.04.001 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.09.01210.1016/j.ceb.2004.09.012 ↗
37. 10.1038/nrdp.2016.5110.1038/nrdp.2016.51 ↗
38. 10.1186/s11671‐024‐04029‐110.1186/s11671‐024‐04029‐1 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41592‐020‐0793‐010.1038/s41592‐020‐0793‐0 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41592‐022‐01672‐310.1038/s41592‐022‐01672‐3 ↗