journal article·2025-10Open access

Conducting Atomic Force Microscopy of Protein Wires

Brian Ashcroft, Stuart Lindsay

Small· Volume 21· Issue 39

Abstract

Abstract Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) studies have shown that protein wires based on the consensus tetratricopetide repeat (CTPR) conduct with an electrical resistance proportional to length of the protein, consistent with long‐range hopping transport along the long axis of the protein. However, the attempts to measure similar currents across proteins mounted in fixed‐gap devices have not been successful. Here, the study reports conducting atomic force microscopy studies of CTPR8 and CTPR4, ≈8 and 4 nm in length, finding that substantial contact force (>50 nN) is required to observe conduction in CTPR8. Scrape‐tests indicate that the probe penetrates the film by ≈1 nm at this force. Importantly, electrical contacts that resemble the STM data are rare—approximately 1% of all contacts. STM reports only successful contacts, so it does not predict statistically how the proteins will behave in a fixed junction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Biodesign Institute Arizona State University Tempe AZ 85287 USA

School of Molecular Sciences Arizona State University Tempe AZ 85287 USA

Department of Physics Arizona State University Tempe AZ 85287 USA

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.08.00410.1016/j.cbpa.2020.08.004 ↗
2. 10.1088/1361-6633/aa85f210.1088/1361-6633/aa85f2 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b0743110.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07431 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.10073410.1016/j.coelec.2021.100734 ↗
5. 10.1038/193364a010.1038/193364a0 ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.201413911810.1073/pnas.2014139118 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-022-28206-x10.1038/s41467-022-28206-x ↗
8. 10.1021/nn304170510.1021/nn3041705 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20140230410.1002/adma.201402304 ↗
10. 10.1039/c3cp52885e10.1039/c3cp52885e ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0244610.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02446 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0639010.1021/acsnano.3c06390 ↗
13. 10.1073/pnas.181967411610.1073/pnas.1819674116 ↗
14. Zhang B. · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 1630
15. 10.1021/acsnano.4c1724810.1021/acsnano.4c17248 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0875610.1021/acsnano.7b08756 ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.100488010710.1073/pnas.1004880107 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2024.10867510.1016/j.bioelechem.2024.108675 ↗
19. 10.1126/sciadv.abm719310.1126/sciadv.abm7193 ↗
20. 10.1021/nn505356g10.1021/nn505356g ↗
21. 10.3390/biom1504049610.3390/biom15040496 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.10044810.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100448 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0022-0728(97)00178-210.1016/S0022-0728(97)00178-2 ↗
24. V.Frascerra F.Calabi G.Maruccio P. P.Pompa R.Cingolani R.Rinaldi In4th IEEE Conf. on Nanotechnology IEEE New York2004 pp502.10.1109/TNANO.2005.851448 ↗
25. Q.Chi O.Farver O J.Fau‐Ulstrup J.Ulstrup Long‐range protein electron transfer observed at the single‐molecule level: In situ mapping of redox‐gated tunneling resonance2005 (0027‐8424 (Print)) PNAS102 16203.10.1073/pnas.0508257102 ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.7b0613010.1021/jacs.7b06130 ↗
27. 10.1021/nl202896910.1021/nl2028969 ↗
28. 10.1021/ja039392a10.1021/ja039392a ↗
29. 10.1063/1.480750410.1063/1.4807504 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.1c1083010.1021/acsnano.1c10830 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsphyschemau.3c0001710.1021/acsphyschemau.3c00017 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0936410.1021/acs.jpcc.0c09364 ↗
33. 10.1021/jacs.0c0180510.1021/jacs.0c01805 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.susc.2005.02.05910.1016/j.susc.2005.02.059 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0125410.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01254 ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20130158910.1002/adma.201301589 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.10404210.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.104042 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.mspro.2015.04.07510.1016/j.mspro.2015.04.075 ↗
39. 10.1371/journal.pone.024714710.1371/journal.pone.0247147 ↗