Robust Spectral Anomaly Detection in EELS Spectral Images via 3D Convolutional Variational Autoencoders
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A 3D Convolutional Variational Autoencoder (3D‐CVAE) is introduced for automated anomaly detection in electron energy‐loss spectroscopy spectrum imaging (EELS‐SI) data. This approach leverages the full 3D structure of EELS‐SI data to detect subtle spectral anomalies while preserving both spatial and spectral correlations across the datacube. By employing cross‐entropy loss and training on bulk spectra, the model learns to reconstruct bulk features characteristic of the defect‐free material. In exploring methods for anomaly detection, both the 3D‐CVAE approach and principal component analysis (PCA) are evaluated, testing their performance using Fe L ‐edge Δ E peak shifts designed to simulate material defects. These results show that 3D‐CVAE achieves superior anomaly detection and maintains consistent performance across various shift magnitudes. The method demonstrates clear bimodal separation between bulk and anomalous spectra, enabling reliable classification. Further analysis verifies that lower‐dimensional representations are robust to anomalies in the data. While performance advantages over PCA diminish with decreasing anomaly concentration, our method maintains high reconstruction quality even in challenging, noise‐dominated spectral regions. This approach provides a robust framework for unsupervised automated detection of spectral anomalies in EELS‐SI data, particularly valuable for analyzing complex material systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science University of Illinois Chicago Chicago IL 60607 USA
Department of Physics University of Illinois Chicago Chicago IL 60607 USA
Funding
Solar Energy Technologies Program
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nl102213910.1021/nl1022139 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature0364410.1038/nature03644 ↗
3. 10.1038/416826a10.1038/416826a ↗
4. 10.1023/A:102142800358710.1023/A:1021428003587 ↗
5. 10.1038/336565a010.1038/336565a0 ↗
6. Egerton R.
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.09550210.1103/PhysRevLett.92.095502 ↗
8. 10.1016/0304-3991(89)90304-510.1016/0304-3991(89)90304-5 ↗
9. 10.1016/0921-4534(93)90501-G10.1016/0921-4534(93)90501-G ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.04720310.1103/PhysRevLett.99.047203 ↗
11. Li M. D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 114
12. 10.1063/1.133057210.1063/1.1330572 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c0277310.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02773 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.10052310.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100523 ↗
15. 10.1038/nature1453910.1038/nature14539 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.aaa841510.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
17. Lin R. · Sci. Rep. · 2021 · 11
18. Hui Y. · arXiv · 2018
19. 10.1186/s40679-018-0052-y10.1186/s40679-018-0052-y ↗
20. 10.1126/science.112764710.1126/science.1127647 ↗
21. Kingma D. P. · arXiv · 2022
22. 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.04500210.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002 ↗
23. 10.1109/TGRS.2019.290875610.1109/TGRS.2019.2908756 ↗
24. 10.1088/2632-2153/ad073b10.1088/2632-2153/ad073b ↗
25. 10.1038/s42256-022-00555-810.1038/s42256-022-00555-8 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41598-021-97668-810.1038/s41598-021-97668-8 ↗
27. 10.1177/1475921721107330110.1177/14759217211073301 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cviu.2020.10292010.1016/j.cviu.2020.102920 ↗
29. 10.3389/fnins.2021.65298710.3389/fnins.2021.652987 ↗
30. 10.1002/smll.20220597710.1002/smll.202205977 ↗
31. 10.1093/mam/ozae044.18010.1093/mam/ozae044.180 ↗
32. 10.1109/5.72679110.1109/5.726791 ↗
33. I.Higgins L.Matthey A.Pal C.Burgess X.Glorot M.Botvinick S.Mohamed A.Lerchner beta‐VAE: Learning Basic Visual Concepts with a Constrained Variational Framework inInternational Conference on Learning Representations2017.
34. 10.1098/rspl.1895.004110.1098/rspl.1895.0041 ↗
35. 10.1109/TSMC.1979.431007610.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
36. C.Van Rijsbergen Information retrieval: theory and practice inProceedings of the joint IBM/University of Newcastle upon tyne seminar on data base systems vol.79 1979 pp.1–14.
37. Rombach R. · arXiv · 2022
38. 10.1088/2632-2153/acf6a910.1088/2632-2153/acf6a9 ↗
39. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.284821010.1109/ACCESS.2018.2848210 ↗
40. Paszke A. · Pytorch: An imperative style, high‐performance deep learning library · 2019
41. S. J.Pennycook P. D.Nellist Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Springer New York 2011.10.1007/978-1-4419-7200-2 ↗
42. J.An S.Cho Variational autoencoder based anomaly detection using reconstruction probability 2015.
43. T.Matsuo H.Fukuhara N.Shimada arXiv2017.
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.21442810.1103/PhysRevB.108.214428 ↗
45. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.306583810.1109/ACCESS.2021.3065838 ↗