journal article·2025-03Open access

Incongruous Harmonics of Vibrating Solid‐Solid Interface

Pardis Biglarbeigi, Alessio Morelli, Gourav Bhattacharya, Joanna Ward, Dewar Finlay, Nikhil Bhalla, Amir Farokh Payam

Small· Volume 21· Issue 10

Abstract

Abstract Deconvoluting the vibrations and harmonics in solid‐solid interfaces is crucial for designing materials with improved performance, durability, and functionality. The measured vibrating microcantilever signal in the dynamic atomic force microscopy (AFM) encompasses a multitude of distinct signatures reflecting a diverse array of material properties. Nevertheless, uncertainties persist in decoding these signatures, primarily arising from the interplay between attractive and repulsive forces. Consequently, it is challenging to correlate the generated harmonics within the solid‐solid interfaces with the imaged phase and topography of materials, as well as the occasional observed contrast reversal. In this study, the vibration harmonics produced at solid‐solid interfaces are correlated, linking them to short‐range nano‐mechanical characteristics through a comprehensive blend of theory, simulation, and experimental methods. These findings shed light on the roots of harmonic generation and contrast reversals, opening avenues for designing innovative materials with customized properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Near-Field Optical Microscopy

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics University of Liverpool Whelan Building, Liverpool England L69 3GE UK

Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering Centre School of Engineering Ulster University Belfast BT15 1AP UK

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41560-018-0096-110.1038/s41560-018-0096-1 ↗
2. Xia X. · Nat. Commun. · 2023 · 14 · 1
3. 10.1038/nmat214010.1038/nmat2140 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat408310.1038/nmat4083 ↗
5. 10.1038/337519a010.1038/337519a0 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0049210.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00492 ↗
7. Formalik F. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2023 · 2308130 · 1
8. 10.1039/C4CP04427D10.1039/C4CP04427D ↗
9. Gudarzi M. M. · Sci. Adv. · 2021 · 7 · 1
10. Wang Z. · Sci. Adv. · 2022 · 8 · 2
11. 10.1038/s41467-024-52768-710.1038/s41467-024-52768-7 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-020-20314-w10.1038/s41467-020-20314-w ↗
13. 10.1038/s41566-019-0572-610.1038/s41566-019-0572-6 ↗
14. 10.1039/C5TB01686J10.1039/C5TB01686J ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cobme.2020.10026010.1016/j.cobme.2020.100260 ↗
16. 10.1186/s13036-019-0209-910.1186/s13036-019-0209-9 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20210582910.1002/adma.202105829 ↗
18. 10.1038/boneres.2017.5910.1038/boneres.2017.59 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x ↗
20. Payam A. F. · Sci. Adv. · 2023 · 9 · 1
21. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0648810.1021/acsnano.3c06488 ↗
22. 10.1038/nnano.2012.3810.1038/nnano.2012.38 ↗
23. 10.1039/D0CS00318B10.1039/D0CS00318B ↗
24. 10.1002/advs.20230347610.1002/advs.202303476 ↗
25. 10.1088/2752-5724/ac8aba10.1088/2752-5724/ac8aba ↗
26. 10.1038/srep0267710.1038/srep02677 ↗
27. Belianinov A. · Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 1
28. 10.1063/1.162600810.1063/1.1626008 ↗
29. 10.3762/bjnano.8.9010.3762/bjnano.8.90 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.micron.2018.12.00710.1016/j.micron.2018.12.007 ↗
31. 10.1016/S1748-0132(08)70012-410.1016/S1748-0132(08)70012-4 ↗
32. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70162-010.1016/S1369-7021(10)70162-0 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.162600810.1063/1.1626008 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11431-017-9161-410.1007/s11431-017-9161-4 ↗
35. 10.1039/D0NA00531B10.1039/D0NA00531B ↗
36. 10.1038/ncomms727010.1038/ncomms7270 ↗
37. 10.1038/nnano.2011.18610.1038/nnano.2011.186 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.01.01310.1016/j.ultramic.2018.01.013 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.11159710.1063/1.111597 ↗
40. 10.1039/c3nr34088k10.1039/c3nr34088k ↗
41. 10.1021/bi500325n10.1021/bi500325n ↗
42. 10.1038/s41596-018-0031-810.1038/s41596-018-0031-8 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.06080110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.060801 ↗
44. 10.1098/rspa.1998.025710.1098/rspa.1998.0257 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14769810.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147698 ↗
46. 10.1039/C9NR04396A10.1039/C9NR04396A ↗
47. 10.1007/s00542-014-2276-710.1007/s00542-014-2276-7 ↗
48. 10.1088/1361-6528/acf8ce10.1088/1361-6528/acf8ce ↗
49. 10.1038/nnano.2008.16210.1038/nnano.2008.162 ↗
50. 10.1021/nn101781v10.1021/nn101781v ↗
51. Gramazio F. · 2018
52. 10.1038/nnano.2007.22610.1038/nnano.2007.226 ↗
53. 10.1021/nn204855810.1021/nn2048558 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apm.2019.10.05110.1016/j.apm.2019.10.051 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.05.01110.1016/j.ultramic.2016.05.011 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.345714310.1063/1.3457143 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.15543610.1103/PhysRevB.66.155436 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.496286610.1063/1.4962866 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10241410.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102414 ↗
60. O.Elbadawy M. R.El‐sakka M. S.Kame An Information Theoretic Image‐Quality Measure Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 1:169 ‐ 172vol.1 June 1998.10.1109/CCECE.1998.682709 ↗
61. 10.1109/TIP.2003.81986110.1109/TIP.2003.819861 ↗
62. Horé A. · 2010 · 2366