Deconvolving Passive and Active Targeting of Liposomes Bearing LDL Receptor Binding Peptides Using the Zebrafish Embryo Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Improving target versus off‐target ratio in nanomedicine remains a major challenge for increasing drug bioavailability and reducing toxicity. Active targeting using ligands on nanoparticle surfaces is a key approach but has limited clinical success. A potential issue is the integration of targeting ligands also changes the physicochemical properties of nanoparticles (passive targeting). Direct studies to understand the mechanisms of active targeting and off‐targeting in vivo are limited by the lack of suitable tools. Here, the biodistribution of a representative active targeting liposome is analyzed, modified with an apolipoprotein E (ApoE) peptide that binds to the low‐density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), using zebrafish embryos. The ApoE liposomes demonstrated the expected liver targeting effect but also accumulated in the kidney glomerulus. The ldlra−/‐ zebrafish is developed to explore the LDLR‐specificity of ApoE liposomes. Interestingly, liver targeting depends on the LDLR‐specific interaction, while glomerular accumulation is independent of LDLR and peptide sequence. It is found that cationic charges of peptides and the size of liposomes govern glomerular targeting. Increasing the size of ApoE liposomes can avoid this off‐targeting. Taken together, the study shows the potential of the zebrafish embryo model for understanding active and passive targeting mechanisms, that can be used to optimize the design of nanoparticles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR) Leiden University Einsteinweg 55 Leiden 2333 CC The Netherlands
Department of Supramolecular and Biomaterials Chemistry Leiden Institute of Chemistry Leiden University Einsteinweg 55 Leiden 2333 The Netherlands
Department of Dermatology University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Langenbeckstraße 1 55131 Mainz Germany
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/446975a10.1038/446975a ↗
2. 10.1038/nature1115910.1038/nature11159 ↗
3. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.600810.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6008 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.trci.2017.10.00510.1016/j.trci.2017.10.005 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.08.00110.1016/j.ejpb.2007.08.001 ↗
6. 10.1002/VIW.2020013110.1002/VIW.20200131 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.01310.1016/j.addr.2020.06.013 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.02710.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.027 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41578-022-00529-710.1038/s41578-022-00529-7 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.00110.1016/j.cell.2020.02.001 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10822-012-9614-610.1007/s10822-012-9614-6 ↗
12. 10.7150/thno.2238610.7150/thno.22386 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.addr.2020.10.00110.1016/j.addr.2020.10.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.03910.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.039 ↗
15. 10.1096/fj.201600827R10.1096/fj.201600827R ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.210925611810.1073/pnas.2109256118 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0571310.1021/acsnano.1c05713 ↗
18. 10.1007/s12274-018-2100-210.1007/s12274-018-2100-2 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.00110.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.001 ↗
20. 10.1002/advs.20220161410.1002/advs.202201614 ↗
21. 10.21769/BioProtoc.417310.21769/BioProtoc.4173 ↗
22. 10.1038/nature1211110.1038/nature12111 ↗
23. 10.3389/fped.2018.0018310.3389/fped.2018.00183 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0699510.1021/acsnano.7b06995 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.nano.2021.10239510.1016/j.nano.2021.102395 ↗
26. 10.1002/adhm.20220270910.1002/adhm.202202709 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20220109510.1002/adma.202201095 ↗
28. 10.1186/1750-1326-5-1610.1186/1750-1326-5-16 ↗
29. 10.1002/hep.184006062310.1002/hep.1840060623 ↗
30. 10.1002/smll.20230113310.1002/smll.202301133 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41467-020-17360-910.1038/s41467-020-17360-9 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10334-005-0111-y10.1007/s10334-005-0111-y ↗
33. S.Chakraborty M.Doktorova T. R.Molugu F. A.Heberle H. L.Scott B.Dzikovski M.Nagao L.‐R.Stingaciu R. F.Standaert F. N.Barrera J.Katsaras G.Khelashvili M. F.Brown R.Ashkar Proceedings of the National Academy of Science ‐ PNAS2020 117 21896.10.1073/pnas.2004807117 ↗
34. 10.1021/bi991209w10.1021/bi991209w ↗
35. 10.1021/nn403258w10.1021/nn403258w ↗
36. 10.1194/jlr.D08152110.1194/jlr.D081521 ↗
37. 10.1186/1471-213X-8-8410.1186/1471-213X-8-84 ↗
38. 10.1002/med.2153210.1002/med.21532 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cotox.2022.10034610.1016/j.cotox.2022.100346 ↗
40. 10.1080/10408444.2016.118104710.1080/10408444.2016.1181047 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10311-020-01033-610.1007/s10311-020-01033-6 ↗
42. 10.34067/KID.000596202110.34067/KID.0005962021 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.mvr.2010.09.00210.1016/j.mvr.2010.09.002 ↗
44. 10.1002/smll.20120073310.1002/smll.201200733 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.10.00910.1016/j.chembiol.2010.10.009 ↗
46. 10.3389/fendo.2014.0016910.3389/fendo.2014.00169 ↗
47. 10.2337/db13-039910.2337/db13-0399 ↗
48. 10.1152/ajpendo.00310.201110.1152/ajpendo.00310.2011 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41467-018-07755-010.1038/s41467-018-07755-0 ↗
50. 10.1002/smll.20190757410.1002/smll.201907574 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.3c0003210.1021/acsmaterialsau.3c00032 ↗
52. 10.1002/smll.20220307010.1002/smll.202203070 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.04.01610.1016/j.jconrel.2021.04.016 ↗
54. 10.1002/cphy.c14007810.1002/cphy.c140078 ↗
55. 10.1007/s40139-015-0080-410.1007/s40139-015-0080-4 ↗
56. 10.3390/cells1218224610.3390/cells12182246 ↗
57. 10.1186/s11671-021-03592-110.1186/s11671-021-03592-1 ↗
58. 10.1038/nature1211110.1038/nature12111 ↗
59. 10.1186/1750-1326-5-1610.1186/1750-1326-5-16 ↗
60. 10.1242/dev.0208710.1242/dev.02087 ↗
61. 10.1101/gr.186379.11410.1101/gr.186379.114 ↗
62. 10.1093/nar/gkv80210.1093/nar/gkv802 ↗
63. 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-210.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2 ↗