journal article·2023-03

Comment on “CO2 Footprint of Thermal Versus Photothermal CO2 Catalysis”

Fan Sun, Xueli Xing, Hui Hong

Small· Volume 19· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The previously published report by Wang et al. provides universal equations for evaluating the net CO2 emission via photothermal/thermal CO2 hydrogenation reactions in batch and flow reactors, respectively. However, it remains to be discussed whether the original feed amount or feed rate of H2 should be changed accordingly when the CO2 reduction rate is selected as the variable to investigate the net CO2 emission rate of the system. If not, the reaction would not be in accordance with the stoichiometric ratio, which is inconsistent with reality, bringing about the optimistic scenario in the assessment of CO2 footprint. This work has taken the potential relationship between the original feed amount or feed rate of H2 and CO2 conversion rate into account. The effects of CO2 conversion rate on the net CO2 emission rate in the photothermal catalytic system are re‐examined, the obtained trends exhibit more challenging preconditions to achieve net‐zero carbon emission than those in the work by Wang et al. The quantitative results indicate that green hydrogen source is indeed vital for carbon neutrality in photothermal CO2 catalysis. Here, the viewpoints will be worth considering and be seen as complementary to the proposed carbon emission assessment equations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Engineering Thermophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 P. R. China

International Research Center for Renewable Energy and State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an 710049 P. R. China

University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 P. R. China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41929-019-0266-y10.1038/s41929-019-0266-y ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12797310.1016/j.cej.2020.127973 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11607610.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116076 ↗
4. 10.1002/smll.20200702510.1002/smll.202007025 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-020-16336-z10.1038/s41467-020-16336-z ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20160165710.1002/aenm.201601657 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.11.00910.1016/j.joule.2021.11.009 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41560-021-00867-w10.1038/s41560-021-00867-w ↗
9. 10.1016/j.checat.2022.01.01710.1016/j.checat.2022.01.017 ↗
10. 10.1039/c0ee00609b10.1039/c0ee00609b ↗
11. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.10265410.1016/j.isci.2021.102654 ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20200143810.1002/anie.202001438 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11777910.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117779 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12126710.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121267 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.10110.1016/j.cej.2015.08.101 ↗