Edge‐Mediated Annihilation of Vacancy Clusters in Monolayer Molybdenum Diselenide (MoSe2) under Electron Beam Irradiation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Annihilation of vacancy clusters in monolayer molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2) under electron beam irradiation is reported. In situ high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy observation reveals that the annihilation is achieved by diffusion of vacancies to the free edge near the vacancy clusters. Monte Carlo simulations confirm that it is energetically favorable for the vacancies to locate at the free edge. By computing the minimum energy path for the annihilation of one vacancy cluster as a case study, it is further shown that electron beam irradiation and pre‐stress in the suspended MoSe2 monolayer are necessary for the vacancies to overcome the energy barriers for diffusion. The findings suggest a new mechanism of vacancy healing in 2D materials and broaden the capability of electron beam for defect engineering of 2D materials, a promising way of tuning their properties for engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Program Northwestern University 2145 Sheridan Rd. Evanston IL 60208 USA
Department of Materials Science and NanoEngineering Rice University 6100 Main Street Houston TX 77005 USA
Center for Nanoscale Materials Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL 60439 USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering Northwestern University 2145 Sheridan Rd. Evanston IL 60208 USA
Funding
National Science Foundation · U.S. Department of Energy · Office of Science
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Hull D. · 2011
2. Jiang J. · Research · 2019 · 2019
3. 10.1021/nn500532f10.1021/nn500532f ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20180034210.1002/adma.201800342 ↗
5. 10.1039/C9TC05337A10.1039/C9TC05337A ↗
6. 10.1038/nnano.2015.24210.1038/nnano.2015.242 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-017-00810-210.1038/s41467-017-00810-2 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41535-017-0018-710.1038/s41535-017-0018-7 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0055410.1021/acsnano.5b00554 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.03550310.1103/PhysRevLett.109.035503 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.03530110.1103/PhysRevB.88.035301 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0067010.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00670 ↗
13. 10.1038/nnano.2014.6410.1038/nnano.2014.64 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20170595410.1002/adma.201705954 ↗
15. 10.1002/smll.20160193010.1002/smll.201601930 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20190466810.1002/adfm.201904668 ↗
17. 10.1021/nn505767310.1021/nn5057673 ↗
18. 10.1038/ncomms729310.1038/ncomms7293 ↗
19. 10.1002/pssr.20110526210.1002/pssr.201105262 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20160420110.1002/adma.201604201 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0265001110.1007/BF02650011 ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-310.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41524-020-00473-610.1038/s41524-020-00473-6 ↗
24. This is controlled by an arbitrary cutoff distance dmax but nevertheless reflects the real physics.
25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0442610.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04426 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0442610.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04426 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cma.2008.03.01010.1016/j.cma.2008.03.010 ↗
28. 10.1039/C9NR06608J10.1039/C9NR06608J ↗
29. 10.1063/1.132322410.1063/1.1323224 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.132967210.1063/1.1329672 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.08540610.1103/PhysRevB.78.085406 ↗
32. 10.1038/ncomms499110.1038/ncomms4991 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0534210.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05342 ↗
34. 10.1093/jmicro/dfu03410.1093/jmicro/dfu034 ↗
35. 10.1186/s40679-017-0049-y10.1186/s40679-017-0049-y ↗
36. Courtney T. H. · 2005
37. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0543510.1021/acsnano.6b05435 ↗
38. 10.1021/nl400747910.1021/nl4007479 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0226310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02263 ↗
40. Frenkel D. · 2001
41. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
42. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/30210.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 ↗