Nanocharacterization, Materials Modeling, and Research Integrity as Enablers of Sound Risk Assessment: Designing Responsible Nanotechnology
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Nanotechnology, as a mature enabling technology, has great potential to boost societal welfare. However, nanomaterials' current and foreseen applications raise serious concerns about their impact on human health and the environment. These concerns emerge because a reliable risk assessment in nanotechnology is yet to be achieved. The reasons for such a shortcoming are the inherent difficulties in characterizing nanomaterials properties. The interaction of characterization with modeling is an open issue and, due to overarching concerns about the reliability of research results, usually framed within the context of research integrity. This essay explores the connection between these different, but deeply intertwined concerns and the way they enable the production of responsible nanotechnology, i.e., nanotechnology devoted to societal welfare.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Nanotechnology research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Lab of Advanced Composite, Nanomaterials, and Nanotechnology (R‐NanoLab) School of Chemical Engineering National Technical University of Athens 9 Heroon Polytechniou str., Zographos Athens 15780 Greece
Funding
EU H2020 · NANOtechnology Risk GOvernance · The European Nanotechnology Community Informatics Platform: Bridging data and disciplinary gaps for industry and regulators
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. European Commission What are KETs and why are they important?https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/key‐enabling‐technologies/description_en(accessed: November2019).
2. 10.1016/j.impact.2020.10021910.1016/j.impact.2020.100219 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.impact.2019.01.00310.1016/j.impact.2019.01.003 ↗
4. 10.1038/533452a10.1038/533452a ↗
5. 10.56021/978080189420610.56021/9780801894206 ↗
6. 10.1038/444267a10.1038/444267a ↗
7. Savolainen K. · 2013
8. 10.1126/science.aad076810.1126/science.aad0768 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.05.00110.1016/j.nantod.2014.05.001 ↗
10. OECD · 200910.1787/b1b0e314-en ↗
11. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.10.01910.1016/j.yrtph.2017.10.019 ↗
12. Kammer F. · J. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. · 2010 · 73 · 445
13. 10.1002/adma.20190155610.1002/adma.201901556 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.02.00810.1016/j.yrtph.2019.02.008 ↗
15. Marmilori M. · 2019
16. 10.1080/1528739090348942210.1080/15287390903489422 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41565-018-0256-210.1038/s41565-018-0256-2 ↗
18. 10.1080/17435390.2017.137135110.1080/17435390.2017.1371351 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.impact.2017.09.00210.1016/j.impact.2017.09.002 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11051-016-3474-210.1007/s11051-016-3474-2 ↗
21. 10.1039/C8NR02278J10.1039/C8NR02278J ↗
22. 10.1515/pac-2017-010110.1515/pac-2017-0101 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.impact.2017.11.00310.1016/j.impact.2017.11.003 ↗
24. 10.1088/1361-6528/28/7/07200110.1088/1361-6528/28/7/072001 ↗
25. 10.3109/17435390.2012.65809610.3109/17435390.2012.658096 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11705-018-1740-910.1007/s11705-018-1740-9 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41563-019-0402-810.1038/s41563-019-0402-8 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20160468110.1002/adma.201604681 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0093210.1021/acsnano.8b00932 ↗
30. 10.1116/1.496486710.1116/1.4964867 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.impact.2017.11.00210.1016/j.impact.2017.11.002 ↗
32. 10.3390/nano804023910.3390/nano8040239 ↗
33. A.Haase F.Klaessig EU US Roadmap Nanoinformatics 2030 EU Nanosafety Cluster 2018 https://zenodo.org/record/1486012#.XvDDesQzbX7.
34. 10.1002/adma.20180539110.1002/adma.201805391 ↗
35. 10.1007/978-3-319-56850-8_1010.1007/978-3-319-56850-8_10 ↗
36. 10.1002/smll.20090017910.1002/smll.200900179 ↗
37. Worth A. · 2017 · 1
38. 10.1039/C5NR01537E10.1039/C5NR01537E ↗
39. 10.1002/smll.20190474910.1002/smll.201904749 ↗
40. 10.1371/journal.pmed.002012410.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 ↗
41. 10.1126/science.349.6251.91010.1126/science.349.6251.910 ↗
42. 10.1371/journal.pbio.100233310.1371/journal.pbio.1002333 ↗
43. 10.1038/541269a10.1038/541269a ↗
44. 10.1038/529456a10.1038/529456a ↗
45. Editorial · Lancet · 2018 · 392 · 2
46. 10.1007/s11948-009-9121-x10.1007/s11948-009-9121-x ↗
47. Y.Bhattacharjee The New York Times Magazine 2013 https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik‐stapels‐audacious‐academic‐fraud.html(accessed: March2020).
48. All European Academies · 2017
49. Virtue‐based ethics and integrity of research: Train‐the‐trainer program for upholding the principles and practices of the European Code of Conduct for research integrity (VIRT2UE) https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/787580.
50. Standard operating procedures for research integrity (SOPs4RI) https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/824481.
51. Singapore Statement on Research Integrity https://wcrif.org/documents/327‐singapore‐statement‐a4size/file(accessed: February 2020).
52. Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross‐Boundary Research Collaborations https://wcrif.org/montreal‐statement/file(accessed: February 2020).
53. D.Moher L.Bouter S.Kleinert P.Glasziou M. H.Sham V.Barbour A.‐M.Coriat N.Foeger U.Dirnagl The Hong Kong Principles for Assessing Researchers: Fostering Research Integrity https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335873662_The_Hong_Kong_Principles_for_Assessing_Researchers_Fostering_Research_Integrity(accessed: February 2020).10.31219/osf.io/m9abx ↗
54. 10.1111/risa.1273410.1111/risa.12734 ↗
55. 10.15406/jnmr.2016.03.0007010.15406/jnmr.2016.03.00070 ↗
56. 10.1002/smll.20080049010.1002/smll.200800490 ↗
57. 10.1007/978-3-030-16573-4_1210.1007/978-3-030-16573-4_12 ↗
58. Howes L. · Chem. Eng. News · 2020 · 98
59. 10.1038/d41586-020-01441-210.1038/d41586-020-01441-2 ↗
60. 10.1038/sdata.2016.1810.1038/sdata.2016.18 ↗
61. OECD Mutual Acceptance of Data (MAD)—OECD https://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/mutualacceptanceofdatamad.htm(accessed: May 2020).
62. Government capability is the ability to “develop programs to implement policy; attract and absorb resources; manage resources; and evaluate current activities to guide future actions.”[63]
63. 10.2307/97627010.2307/976270 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.11984510.1016/j.techfore.2019.119845 ↗
65. 10.1136/jme.2005.01567710.1136/jme.2005.015677 ↗
66. 10.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-210.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-2 ↗
67. O'Mathúna D. P. · Nanotechnol. Dev. · 2011 · 1 · 26