Magnetic Imaging of Cyanide‐Bridged Co‐ordination Nanoparticles Grafted on FIB‐Patterned Si Substrates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Prussian blue CsNiCr nanoparticles are used to decorate selected portions of a Si substrate. For successful grafting to take place, the Si surface needs first to be chemically functionalized. Low‐dose focused ion beam patterning on uniformly functionalized surfaces selects those portions that will not participate in the grafting process. Step‐by‐step control is assured by atomic force and high‐resolution scanning electron microscopy, revealing a submonolayer distribution of the grafted nanoparticles. By novel scanning Hall‐probe microscopy, an in‐depth investigation of the magnetic response of the nanoparticles to varying temperature and applied magnetic field is provided. The magnetic images acquired suggest that low‐temperature canted ferromagnetism is found in the grafted nanoparticles, similar to what is observed in the equivalent bulk material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Magnetic properties of thin films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20039000610.1002/adma.200390006 ↗
2. 10.1039/b419271k10.1039/b419271k ↗
3. 10.1021/ic050802110.1021/ic0508021 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl070366a10.1021/nl070366a ↗
5. Gómez‐Segura J. · Chem. Commun. · 2006 · 1
6. 10.1021/ic062426610.1021/ic0624266 ↗
7. 10.1021/jp802195x10.1021/jp802195x ↗
8. 10.1021/nl034630l10.1021/nl034630l ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20046155410.1002/anie.200461554 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl050801610.1021/nl0508016 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.180849210.1063/1.1808492 ↗
12. 10.1039/b509282e10.1039/b509282e ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20060199910.1002/adma.200601999 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.11.06110.1016/j.susc.2006.11.061 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20070044810.1002/adma.200700448 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.17240610.1103/PhysRevB.73.172406 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.03810.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.038 ↗
18. 10.1039/b516425g10.1039/b516425g ↗
19. 10.1039/B605221E10.1039/B605221E ↗
20. 10.1021/ic702328w10.1021/ic702328w ↗
21. 10.1126/science.284.5422.196910.1126/science.284.5422.1969 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.236483310.1063/1.2364833 ↗
23. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/9/00510.1088/0957-4484/17/9/005 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.03.00210.1016/j.ultramic.2006.03.002 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.361010.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3610 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja00079a07110.1021/ja00079a071 ↗
27. 10.1002/047086793010.1002/0470867930 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.49710.1103/PhysRevB.57.497 ↗
29. We chose the working temperature ofT = 20 K because i) it is well belowTCand ii) the width of the scan area (7 × 7 μm2) is sufficiently large to look at the patterning. At much lower temperatures for example 2 K the experimental magnetic images cover areas not larger than 4.5 × 4.5 μm2. For instance the supplementary material provides an image of an area existing within a single stripe forT = 2 K.
30. For applied fields not exceeding 70 kOe powder samples of the bulk equivalent material show molar magnetization values that are roughly 12% smaller than that expected for full ferromagnetic coupling of all Ni and Cr ions.[16]This discrepancy can be accounted for by a canting angle of ≈60° between the two ferromagnetic Ni and Cr sublattices. This is likely the result of an intense exchange anisotropy acting on the metal ions. Usingz = 6 for the number of nearest neighbors andJ/kB = 6.5 K for the Ni‐Cr exchange strength [16]a rough mean‐field calculation tells us that the exchange field acting on the Ni and Cr ions amounts to$H_{{\rm ex}} = (2zJ/k\rm b )S/g\mu \rm B$ = 390 and 530 kOe for Ni and Cr respectively.
31. 10.1021/ic971174t10.1021/ic971174t ↗