Optimized Assembly and Covalent Coupling of Single-Molecule DNA Origami Nanoarrays
Source abstract
Abstract
Artificial DNA nanostructures, such as DNA origami, have great potential as templates for the bottom-up fabrication of both biological and nonbiological nanodevices at a resolution unachievable by conventional top-down approaches. However, because origami are synthesized in solution, origami-templated devices cannot easily be studied or integrated into larger on-chip architectures. Electrostatic self-assembly of origami onto lithographically defined binding sites on Si/SiO2 substrates has been achieved, but conditions for optimal assembly have not been characterized, and the method requires high Mg2+ concentrations at which most devices aggregate. We present a quantitative study of parameters affecting origami placement, reproducibly achieving single-origami binding at 94±4% of sites, with 90% of these origami having an orientation within ±10° of their target orientation. Further, we introduce two techniques for converting electrostatic DNA-surface bonds to covalent bonds, allowing origami arrays to be used under a wide variety of Mg2+-free solution conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departments of †Bioengineering, ‡Computer Science, and §Computation & Neural Systems, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
Funding
Division of Computing and Communication Foundations · Army Research Office · Office of Naval Research
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Seeman N. C. · J. Theor. Biol. · 1982 · 99 · 23710.1016/0022-5193(82)90002-9 ↗
2. Rothemund P. W. K. · Nature · 2006 · 440 · 29710.1038/nature04586 ↗
3. Douglas S. M. · Nature · 2009 · 459 · 41410.1038/nature08016 ↗
4. Dietz H. · Science · 2009 · 325 · 72510.1126/science.1174251 ↗
5. Han D. · Science · 2011 · 332 · 34210.1126/science.1202998 ↗
6. Maune H. T. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 6110.1038/nnano.2009.311 ↗
7. Geng Y. · Langmuir · 2013 · 29 · 348210.1021/la305155u ↗
8. Ding B. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 324810.1021/ja9101198 ↗
9. Dutta P. K. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 1198510.1021/ja1115138 ↗
10. Ko S. H. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2012 · 22 · 101510.1002/adfm.201102077 ↗
11. Kuzyk A. · Nature · 2012 · 483 · 31110.1038/nature10889 ↗
12. Acuna G. P. · Science · 2012 · 338 · 50610.1126/science.1228638 ↗
13. Voigt N. V. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 20010.1038/nnano.2010.5 ↗
14. Prinz J. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 414010.1021/jz402076b ↗
15. Thacker V. V. · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 344810.1038/ncomms4448 ↗
16. Rajendran A. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2012 · 51 · 87410.1002/anie.201102113 ↗
17. Qiu W. · Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. · 2012 · 19 · 19310.1038/nsmb.2205 ↗
18. Pfitzner E. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2013 · 125 · 792010.1002/ange.201302727 ↗
19. Schreiber R. · Small · 2011 · 7 · 179510.1002/smll.201100465 ↗
20. Surwade S. P. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 677810.1021/ja401785h ↗
21. Surwade S. P. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 1186810.1021/ja2038886 ↗
22. Jin Z. · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 166310.1038/ncomms2690 ↗
23. Holloway C. · IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. · 2012 · 54 · 1010.1109/MAP.2012.6230714 ↗
24. Kuzyk A. · Small · 2008 · 4 · 44710.1002/smll.200701320 ↗
25. Kershner R. J. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2009 · 4 · 55710.1038/nnano.2009.220 ↗
26. Gerdon A. E. · Small · 2009 · 5 · 194210.1002/smll.200900442 ↗
27. Hung A. M. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 12110.1038/nnano.2009.450 ↗
28. Gao B. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 1268010.1021/la101343k ↗
29. Ding B. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 506510.1021/nl1033073 ↗
30. Pearson A. C. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 198110.1021/nl200306w ↗
31. Penzo E. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B · 2011 · 29 · 06F20510.1116/1.3646900 ↗
32. Scheible M. B. · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 162710.1021/nl500092j ↗
33. Teshome B. · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 179010.1039/C3NR04627C ↗
34. Dong Y. · Anal. Chem. · 1998 · 70 · 473010.1021/ac9805697 ↗
35. Dishon M. · Langmuir · 2011 · 27 · 1297710.1021/la202533s ↗
36. Cheng H. · Biophys. J. · 2006 · 90 · 116410.1529/biophysj.105.070649 ↗
37. Libera J. A. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 2300110.1021/jp0534941 ↗
38. Becker, J.; Pysch, D.; Leimenstoll, A.; Hermle, M.; Glunz, S.Wet-Chemical Pre-treatment of c-Si Substrates Enhancing the Performance of a-Si: H/c-Si Hetero-Junction Solar Cells.24th European PV Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Hamburg, Germany. 2009.
39. Pastré D. · Biophys. J. · 2003 · 85 · 250710.1016/S0006-3495(03)74673-6 ↗
40. Kastantin M. · Small · 2013 · 9 · 93310.1002/smll.201202335 ↗
41. Skaug M. J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 25610110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.256101 ↗
42. Wang D. · Biophys. Chem. · 1992 · 43 · 11710.1016/0301-4622(92)80027-3 ↗
43. Shlyakhtenko L. S. · Ultramicroscopy · 2003 · 97 · 27910.1016/S0304-3991(03)00053-6 ↗
44. Lange S. A. · Anal. Chem. · 2004 · 76 · 164110.1021/ac035127w ↗
45. Kaufmann T. · Polym. Chem. · 2010 · 1 · 37110.1039/B9PY00281B ↗
46. Han S.-p. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 112910.1021/nl201818u ↗
47. Janson J.-C. · 2012 · 151