journal article·2026-02Open access

Evidence for Drop‐Like Nuclear Deformation in Sheared Endothelial Monolayers

Mohammad Mohajeri, Ting‐Ching Wang, Pooja Agarwal, Simran Kaur, Ankit Kumar, Richard B. Dickinson, Abhishek Jain, Tanmay P. Lele

Small· Volume 22· Issue 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT Shear stress imparted by blood flow tends to smoothen endothelial monolayers, a response classically attributed to reduced nuclear height and nuclear reorientation along flow. However, the mechanical basis remains unclear. Here, we tested predictions of the nuclear drop model—which posits that nuclear shape changes occur at constant volume and surface area—in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) under physiological shear stress. HUVEC nuclear morphologies varied from smooth, flat nuclei to wrinkled, tall ones. Applying shear stress reduced the frequency of tall, wrinkled nuclei, explaining the population‐level decrease in nuclear height. Lamin A/C–depleted nuclei are highly irregular and failed to recover shapes postindentation on PDMS microposts, suggesting that lamin A/C confers nuclear surface tension. Nuclear volume and surface area remained constant under shear, consistent with the drop model, and a computational model based on these constraints successfully predicted observed nuclear shapes. Neither lamin A/C nor lamin B1 depletion prevented shear‐induced YAP nuclear localization; instead, shear detached poorly spread cells, increasing spreading, focal adhesion assembly, and cytoskeletal tension in the remaining cells, thereby promoting YAP nuclear localization. These findings revise classical interpretations of flow‐induced endothelial smoothing and show that flow‐induced YAP nuclear localization results from increased cell spreading rather than nuclear deformation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ · Nuclear Structure and Function

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA

Artie Mcferrin Department of Chemical Engineering Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology University of California Berkeley California USA

Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science University of California Berkeley California USA

Department of Chemical Engineering University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences Houston Methodist Research Institute Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA

Department of Medical Physiology Texas A&M Health Science Center Bryan Texas USA

Department of Translational Medical Sciences Texas A&M University Houston Texas USA

School of Engineering Medicine Texas A&M University Houston Texas USA

Funding

National Institutes of Health · National Science Foundation · U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority · National Aeronautics and Space Administration · National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute · U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity · Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1073/pnas.202323611810.1073/pnas.2023236118 ↗
2. Role of Shear Stress Direction in Endothelial Mechanotransduction
3. 10.1161/01.RES.74.1.16310.1161/01.RES.74.1.163 ↗
4. 10.1152/physrev.1995.75.3.51910.1152/physrev.1995.75.3.519 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0006‐3495(00)76571‐410.1016/S0006‐3495(00)76571‐4 ↗
6. 10.1161/01.RES.0000039537.73816.E510.1161/01.RES.0000039537.73816.E5 ↗
7. 10.1073/pnas.050604110210.1073/pnas.0506041102 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms166810.1038/ncomms1668 ↗
9. 10.1371/journal.pone.010789510.1371/journal.pone.0107895 ↗
10. 10.1126/sciadv.ads657310.1126/sciadv.ads6573 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467‐024‐54577‐410.1038/s41467‐024‐54577‐4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.12066210.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120662 ↗
13. 10.1073/pnas.230735612010.1073/pnas.2307356120 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41567‐023‐02216‐y10.1038/s41567‐023‐02216‐y ↗
15. 10.1002/advs.20220124810.1002/advs.202201248 ↗
16. 10.1002/jcp.2603110.1002/jcp.26031 ↗
17. 10.1038/nature1013710.1038/nature10137 ↗
18. 10.1063/5.007165210.1063/5.0071652 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cobme.2023.10048310.1016/j.cobme.2023.100483 ↗
20. 10.1039/D4SM00683F10.1039/D4SM00683F ↗
21. 10.1039/C9LC00469F10.1039/C9LC00469F ↗
22. 10.1161/JAHA.121.02279510.1161/JAHA.121.022795 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11517‐008‐0330‐210.1007/s11517‐008‐0330‐2 ↗
24. 10.1091/mbc.E21‐10‐052810.1091/mbc.E21‐10‐0528 ↗
25. 10.1091/mbc.E19‐09‐052010.1091/mbc.E19‐09‐0520 ↗
26. 10.3389/fcell.2023.105872710.3389/fcell.2023.1058727 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.06.00310.1016/j.cell.2023.06.003 ↗
28. 10.1111/febs.1383610.1111/febs.13836 ↗
29. 10.1038/nrm259410.1038/nrm2594 ↗
30. 10.1038/nature0919810.1038/nature09198 ↗
31. 10.1073/pnas.230128512010.1073/pnas.2301285120 ↗
32. A Spatial Model of YAP/TAZ Signaling Reveals How Stiffness, Dimensionality, and Shape Contribute to Emergent Outcomes
33. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.02.00810.1016/j.cellsig.2006.02.008 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.02.01310.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.02.013 ↗
35. 10.1172/JCI20041967010.1172/JCI200419670 ↗
36. 10.12945/j.aorta.2016.14.06910.12945/j.aorta.2016.14.069 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.08.03610.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.08.036 ↗
38. 10.1007/s12195‐017‐0513‐810.1007/s12195‐017‐0513‐8 ↗
39. 10.1172/JCI12129710.1172/JCI121297 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.01.00410.1016/j.bpj.2022.01.004 ↗
41. 10.1073/pnas.101921910810.1073/pnas.1019219108 ↗
42. 10.1038/srep2341210.1038/srep23412 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.00610.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.006 ↗
44. 10.3389/fcell.2023.105872710.3389/fcell.2023.1058727 ↗
45. 10.1038/nature1099910.1038/nature10999 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.09.00310.1016/j.ceb.2012.09.003 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.05.01010.1016/j.semcdb.2016.05.010 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0960‐9822(01)00587‐510.1016/S0960‐9822(01)00587‐5 ↗
49. 10.1038/nature2171810.1038/nature21718 ↗
50. 10.1074/jbc.M115.70831310.1074/jbc.M115.708313 ↗
51. 10.1093/cvr/cvz02710.1093/cvr/cvz027 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.02.01910.1016/j.devcel.2017.02.019 ↗
53. 10.1039/D0LC01283A10.1039/D0LC01283A ↗
54. 10.1073/pnas.161312111310.1073/pnas.1613121113 ↗
55. 10.1038/nature2060210.1038/nature20602 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41419‐020‐2343‐110.1038/s41419‐020‐2343‐1 ↗
57. 10.1038/s41563‐018‐0180‐810.1038/s41563‐018‐0180‐8 ↗
58. YAP/TAZ as Master Regulators in Cancer: Modulation, Function and Therapeutic Approaches
59. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.00810.1016/j.cell.2017.10.008 ↗
60. 10.1083/jcb.20230815210.1083/jcb.202308152 ↗
61. 10.1038/s41467‐022‐28693‐y10.1038/s41467‐022‐28693‐y ↗
62. 10.1091/mbc.E19‐11‐060210.1091/mbc.E19‐11‐0602 ↗
63. 10.1038/s41467‐023‐38770‐510.1038/s41467‐023‐38770‐5 ↗
64. 10.1007/s12195‐024‐00805‐210.1007/s12195‐024‐00805‐2 ↗
65. 10.1073/pnas.090868610610.1073/pnas.0908686106 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.02310.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.023 ↗
67. 10.1242/jcs.16170310.1242/jcs.161703 ↗
68. 10.1016/B978-0-12-819178-1.00009-510.1016/B978-0-12-819178-1.00009-5 ↗
69. 10.1016/0010‐4809(89)90034‐710.1016/0010‐4809(89)90034‐7 ↗
70. 10.1074/jbc.M51351120010.1074/jbc.M513511200 ↗
71. 10.1038/s41592‐020‐01018‐x10.1038/s41592‐020‐01018‐x ↗
72. 10.1145/2185520.218558110.1145/2185520.2185581 ↗
73. 10.1137/S003614450342912110.1137/S0036144503429121 ↗