Effective Strain Engineering of 2D Materials via Metal Deposition
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract 2D materials, especially their monolayers, have garnered significant attention due to their unique electrical, optical and mechanical properties. Strain engineering is an effective way to modulate these properties. However, challenges remain in preventing slip or decoupling between the 2D material and the substrate due to the inherent weak van der Waals interactions. In this study, metal films are employed to apply strain to 2D materials. The high surface energy of metals helps to provide higher interaction forces, thereby improving strain transfer efficiency. Biaxial compressive and uniaxial tensile strain can be applied to monolayer MoS2, with the highest modulation rate of 542 and 161.7 meV/%, respectively, as characterized by photoluminescence (PL) spectra. Furthermore, this new approach can be broader to other 2D materials, such as WS2 or WSe2, allowing for precise control over strain manipulation. The work introduces a promising new approach for efficient and controllable strain engineering of 2D materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310027 China
School of Engineering Westlake University Hangzhou 310030 China
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/inf2.1217710.1002/inf2.12177 ↗
2. 10.1021/nn204667z10.1021/nn204667z ↗
3. 10.1021/nl401474810.1021/nl4014748 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41377-020-00421-510.1038/s41377-020-00421-5 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.abc417410.1126/science.abc4174 ↗
6. 10.1109/55.28538910.1109/55.285389 ↗
7. 10.1038/nnano.2012.19310.1038/nnano.2012.193 ↗
8. 10.1021/nn203879f10.1021/nn203879f ↗
9. 10.1016/j.physleta.2021.12770910.1016/j.physleta.2021.127709 ↗
10. 10.1002/adfm.20130199910.1002/adfm.201301999 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20090426410.1002/adma.200904264 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41699-017-0013-710.1038/s41699-017-0013-7 ↗
13. 10.1088/2053-1583/abf23410.1088/2053-1583/abf234 ↗
14. 10.1098/rspa.1971.014110.1098/rspa.1971.0141 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-020-15023-310.1038/s41467-020-15023-3 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.12130110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121301 ↗
17. 10.1039/D2NR04362A10.1039/D2NR04362A ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.07.01210.1016/j.jmps.2014.07.012 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.494837610.1063/1.4948376 ↗
20. 10.1080/1040843920824458610.1080/10408439208244586 ↗
21. 10.1116/1.56911310.1116/1.569113 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.498664610.1063/1.4986646 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.124298810.1126/science.1242988 ↗
24. 10.1021/nn402483410.1021/nn4024834 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsaelm.1c0018710.1021/acsaelm.1c00187 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20160262610.1002/adma.201602626 ↗
27. 10.1021/nl501988y10.1021/nl501988y ↗
28. 10.1088/2053-1583/ab1e0610.1088/2053-1583/ab1e06 ↗
29. Henríquez‐Guerra E. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2023 · 15
30. 10.1088/2053-1583/ac08f210.1088/2053-1583/ac08f2 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14639810.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146398 ↗
32. 10.3938/jkps.66.178910.3938/jkps.66.1789 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.physe.2022.11540110.1016/j.physe.2022.115401 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.physleta.2012.02.02910.1016/j.physleta.2012.02.029 ↗
35. 10.1039/c2cp42181j10.1039/c2cp42181j ↗
36. 10.1038/ncomms624610.1038/ncomms6246 ↗
37. 10.1039/C5NR08219F10.1039/C5NR08219F ↗
38. 10.1016/j.nanoms.2021.03.00110.1016/j.nanoms.2021.03.001 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0251310.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02513 ↗
40. 10.1021/nl401316610.1021/nl4013166 ↗
41. 10.1021/jp405820g10.1021/jp405820g ↗
42. 10.1039/C8RA10656H10.1039/C8RA10656H ↗
43. 10.1088/0957-4484/13/4/30210.1088/0957-4484/13/4/302 ↗
44. R. Elliott Deflection of beams http://www.clag.org.uk/beam.html(accessed: December 2010)
45. Pratik Bending Stiffness: Definition Formula Units Calculation https://mechcontent.com/bending‐stiffness/