Evidence of Organic Polymeric Behavior in the Glass Transition of Metal–Organic Frameworks
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The origin of the glass transition is still an open debate, especially for the new class of glasses, formed from metal‐organic compounds. High‐temperature in situ 2H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) experiments are performed on deuterated samples of ZIF‐62 (Zn(C3H4N2)2‐x(C7H6N2)x, with x = 0.25 and x = 0.05), the prototypical metal–organic framework glass former. Using lineshape analysis, frequencies and angular amplitudes of oscillations of the imidazolate ring during heating up to the melt progressively increasing from ≈10 to 150 MHz, and from ≈5° to 25° are found. This behavior is compositionally dependent and points to the origin of the glass transition lying in organic linker movement, in a similar vein to that witnessed in some organics and contrary to the purely inorganic‐based view of Metal–Organic Framework (MOF) glasses taken to date. This experimental approach shows the potential to elucidate the melting and/or decomposition process for a wide range of MOFs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes · Glass properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CNRS CEMHTI UPR3079 University of Orléans 1 Avenue de la Recherche scientifique Orléans 45000 France
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 3QZ UK
ILV UMR CNRS 8180 University of Versailles Versailles 78000 France
CortecNet CortecNet 7 avenue du Hoggar Les Ulis 91940 France
Department of Chemistry University of Liverpool Crown Street Liverpool L69 7ZD UK
Funding
Royal Society of Chemistry
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
2. Horike S. · Chem · 2009 · 1 · 695
3. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0159410.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01594 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41578-018-0054-310.1038/s41578-018-0054-3 ↗
5. 10.1126/sciadv.aao682710.1126/sciadv.aao6827 ↗
6. 10.1039/C8TA08016J10.1039/C8TA08016J ↗
7. 10.1088/0953-8984/25/39/39540310.1088/0953-8984/25/39/395403 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja300034j10.1021/ja300034j ↗
9. 10.1021/ar900116g10.1021/ar900116g ↗
10. 10.1016/j.catcom.2007.11.01910.1016/j.catcom.2007.11.019 ↗
11. 10.1021/cr200139g10.1021/cr200139g ↗
12. 10.1039/D0SC03940C10.1039/D0SC03940C ↗
13. 10.1039/D0GC00546K10.1039/D0GC00546K ↗
14. 10.1021/ja206082s10.1021/ja206082s ↗
15. 10.1021/ja907359t10.1021/ja907359t ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20191580710.1002/anie.201915807 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.265.5176.120610.1126/science.265.5176.1206 ↗
18. 10.1038/nmat499810.1038/nmat4998 ↗
19. 10.1038/nmat96310.1038/nmat963 ↗
20. 10.1088/0953-8984/19/41/41510210.1088/0953-8984/19/41/415102 ↗
21. 10.1021/jacs.5b1322010.1021/jacs.5b13220 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0066-4103(04)55003-210.1016/S0066-4103(04)55003-2 ↗
23. 10.1016/B978-0-08-089054-8.00004-610.1016/B978-0-08-089054-8.00004-6 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.01.00810.1016/j.jmr.2009.01.008 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0931210.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09312 ↗
26. 10.1039/c3981000120710.1039/c39810001207 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja00369a00710.1021/ja00369a007 ↗
28. 10.1126/science.aaz025110.1126/science.aaz0251 ↗
29. 10.1016/bs.arnmr.2015.04.00410.1016/bs.arnmr.2015.04.004 ↗
30. 10.1063/5.012587910.1063/5.0125879 ↗
31. 10.1126/science.267.5206.192410.1126/science.267.5206.1924 ↗
32. 10.1093/oso/9780198520597.001.000110.1093/oso/9780198520597.001.0001 ↗
33. Doi M. · 1986
34. 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.11.00410.1016/j.physrep.2014.11.004 ↗
35. 10.1021/jacs.9b0555810.1021/jacs.9b05558 ↗
36. 10.1039/D1CC03541J10.1039/D1CC03541J ↗
37. 10.1002/admt.20220034310.1002/admt.202200343 ↗
38. 10.1021/jacs.3c0193310.1021/jacs.3c01933 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c0080610.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00806 ↗
40. 10.1109/TIM.2023.332623410.1109/TIM.2023.3326234 ↗