Minimizing the Carrier Collection Loss of the Neutral‐Color Transparent Crystalline‐silicon Solar Modules via Hybrid Electrode Design
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Transparent solar cells can be used where conventional solar cells are inapplicable, such as, in glass windows of buildings; however, reports on modularization, which is essential for their commercialization, are scarce. Here, a novel modularization method has been proposed for the fabrication of transparent solar cells and a 100‐cm2neutral‐color transparent crystalline‐silicon solar module has been developed using a hybrid electrode comprising a microgrid electrode and an edge busbar electrode. The transparent solar module exhibits a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 11.94 and 13.14% when connected in series and in parallel, respectively, with an average visible transmittance of 20%. Additionally, the module exhibits negligible losses in PCE (lower than 0.23%) in outdoor, mechanical‐load, and damp‐heat (at 85°C/85% RH) stability tests, indicating high stability. The transparent solar module proposes here could facilitate the commercialization of transparent solar cells.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · solar cell performance optimization · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Energy and Chemical Engineering Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST) Ulsan 44919 Republic of Korea
Graduate School of Carbon Neutrality Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST) Ulsan 44919 Republic of Korea
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41893-021-00836-x10.1038/s41893-021-00836-x ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rser.2020.11059110.1016/j.rser.2020.110591 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.10.01910.1016/j.jobe.2018.10.019 ↗
4. 10.1515/green-2013-002010.1515/green-2013-0020 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.solmat.2022.11195210.1016/j.solmat.2022.111952 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41560-017-0016-910.1038/s41560-017-0016-9 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10014310.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100143 ↗
8. 10.1002/solr.20200061410.1002/solr.202000614 ↗
9. 10.3390/en1509328610.3390/en15093286 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.07.00410.1016/j.joule.2021.07.004 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.00810.1016/j.joule.2019.11.008 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10071510.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100715 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.seta.2021.10148110.1016/j.seta.2021.101481 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.12010.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.120 ↗
15. 10.3390/app1109417010.3390/app11094170 ↗
16. J.Summhammer Z.Halavani inHigh‐voltage pv‐modules with crystalline silicon solar cells Proceedings of the 28th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition Villepinte France 2013 3119–3122.
17. 10.1002/pip.334210.1002/pip.3342 ↗
18. 10.1109/TED.2010.207619010.1109/TED.2010.2076190 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11129610.1016/j.solmat.2021.111296 ↗
20. O.Dupré J.Levrat J.Champliaud M.Despeisse M.Boccard C.Ballif inAIP Conf. Proc. AIP Publishing LLC2018 090001.10.1063/1.5049306 ↗
21. 10.1002/admi.20150034710.1002/admi.201500347 ↗
22. H.Wirth Lasers in Wafer‐based PV Module Production: Overview of industrial production technologies using cell and string soldering with lasers Wiley Online Library2010 Vol.7 36–38.10.1002/latj.201090057 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.21710.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.217 ↗
24. 10.1002/pip.101910.1002/pip.1019 ↗
25. Alsema E. · MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) · 2005 · 895
26. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.07.00810.1016/j.solmat.2008.07.008 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.01510.1016/j.joule.2019.08.015 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.01.02010.1016/j.solmat.2011.01.020 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.06710.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.067 ↗
30. A.Vasan L.Laskai M.Ilic inDefining humidity test duration for microinverter reliability assessment: A physics‐of‐failure approach 2017 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC) IEEE2017 2336–2340.10.1109/APEC.2017.7931026 ↗