Toughness Amplification via Controlled Nanostructure in Lightweight Nano‐Bouligand Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The enhanced properties of nanomaterials make them attractive for advanced high‐performance materials, but their role in promoting toughness has been unclear. Fabrication challenges often prevent the proper organization of nanomaterial constituents, and inadequate testing methods have led to a poor knowledge of toughness at small scales. In this work, the individual roles of nanomaterials and nanoarchitecture on toughness are quantified by creating lightweight materials made from helicoidal polymeric nanofibers (nano‐Bouligand). Unidirectional ( = 0°) and nano‐Bouligand beams ( = 2°–90°) are fabricated using two‐photon lithography and are designed in a micro‐single edge notch bend (µ‐SENB) configuration with relative densities between 48% and 81%. Experiments demonstrate two unique toughening mechanisms. First, size‐enhanced ductility of nanoconfined polymer fibers increases specific fracture energy by 70% in the 0° unidirectional beams. Second, nanoscale stiffness heterogeneity created via inter‐layer fiber twisting impedes crack growth and improves absolute fracture energy dissipation by 48% in high‐density nano‐Bouligand materials. This demonstration of size‐enhanced ductility and nanoscale heterogeneity as coexisting toughening mechanisms reveals the capacity for nanoengineered materials to greatly improve mechanical resilience in a new generation of advanced materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Washington Seattle WA 98195 USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Washington Seattle WA 98195 USA
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1073/pnas.063160910010.1073/pnas.0631609100 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.00510.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00231-610.1016/S1359-6454(98)00231-6 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.002 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.01910.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.019 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.02610.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.026 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41586-020-2813-810.1038/s41586-020-2813-8 ↗
8. 10.1038/nmat471910.1038/nmat4719 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0243910.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02439 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-019-12743-z10.1038/s41467-019-12743-z ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20190156110.1002/adma.201901561 ↗
12. 10.1038/nmat408910.1038/nmat4089 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20150240310.1002/adma.201502403 ↗
14. 10.1242/jeb.0183110.1242/jeb.01831 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.121876410.1126/science.1218764 ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20140055910.1002/smll.201400559 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10010910.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100109 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.06710.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.067 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0040-8166(72)80042-910.1016/S0040-8166(72)80042-9 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.06.00410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.06.004 ↗
21. 10.1038/nmat391510.1038/nmat3915 ↗
22. 10.1002/adem.20160014310.1002/adem.201600143 ↗
23. 10.1002/smll.20190057310.1002/smll.201900573 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20170006010.1002/adma.201700060 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.0c0776210.1021/acsami.0c07762 ↗
26. 10.1073/pnas.200063911710.1073/pnas.2000639117 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.eml.2020.10104210.1016/j.eml.2020.101042 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.07.00110.1016/j.jmps.2019.07.001 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.eml.2019.10059810.1016/j.eml.2019.100598 ↗
30. 10.1126/science.125590810.1126/science.1255908 ↗
31. 10.1038/nmat373810.1038/nmat3738 ↗
32. 10.1038/nmat456110.1038/nmat4561 ↗
33. 10.1038/srep2057010.1038/srep20570 ↗
34. 10.1073/pnas.181730911610.1073/pnas.1817309116 ↗
35. 10.1002/smll.20190383410.1002/smll.201903834 ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.040409610110.1073/pnas.0404096101 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.03.03310.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.03.033 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10776210.1016/j.matdes.2019.107762 ↗
39. 10.1557/jmr.2015.210.1557/jmr.2015.2 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.00410.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.004 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.09610.1016/j.msea.2017.10.096 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.05110.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.051 ↗
43. 10.1080/14786435.2012.65844910.1080/14786435.2012.658449 ↗
44. 10.1088/1748-3190/abdd9d10.1088/1748-3190/abdd9d ↗
45. 10.1088/2515-7647/abdcba10.1088/2515-7647/abdcba ↗
46. 10.1002/admt.20190014610.1002/admt.201900146 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0040-8166(72)80042-910.1016/S0040-8166(72)80042-9 ↗
48. ASTM E1820‐09e1 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness Vol. 03.01 ASTM International 2011.
49. 10.1002/smll.20190237010.1002/smll.201902370 ↗
50. 10.1007/BF0115755610.1007/BF01157556 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.00410.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.004 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10858210.1016/j.matdes.2020.108582 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.01010.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.010 ↗
54. 10.1007/BF0264554610.1007/BF02645546 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.002 ↗
56. 10.1016/0020-7683(89)90021-810.1016/0020-7683(89)90021-8 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10768410.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107684 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.03410.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.034 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.00710.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.007 ↗