journal article·2020-09

PBPK Modeling of Slightly Soluble Silver Nanomaterials and Regulatory Acceptance

Frederick C. Klaessig

Small· Volume 16· Issue 36
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract International efforts to promote predictive toxicology incorporate some form of modeling based on the regularities, insights, and hypotheses gained from analyzing laboratory studies compiled in databases. While there has been a broad commentary on definitions, metadata, and test methodologies, all necessary to establishing data repositories, there has been less on translating the resulting insights into computational models. The recent use of a computational model to support a recommended exposure limit for nanoparticulate silver is an opportunity to examine physiologically based toxicokinetics in terms of data availability, model verification and validation, and regulatory acceptance. The resulting suggestions align with findings from the EU–US Roadmap Nanoinformatics 2030 and the 2018 acceptance of a computational model by the European Food Safety Authority.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology · Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Pennsylvania Bio Nano Systems LLC 69 Homestead Drive Doylestown PA 18901 USA

Funding

National Cancer Institute · National Nanotechnology Coordinating Office

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. EU–US Roadmap Nanoinformatics 2030 https://10.5281/zenodo.1486012;https://www.nanosafetycluster.eu/Nanoinformatics2030.html(accessed: December2019).
2. IPCS · 2010
3. Peters S. A. · 2012
4. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0814210.1021/acsnano.9b08142 ↗
5. 10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_310.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_3 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.03910.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.039 ↗
7. Cronin M. T. · 201310.1039/9781849734400 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11229-008-9435-210.1007/s11229-008-9435-2 ↗
9. 2007
10. Kuempel E. D. · 2018
11. 10.3109/17435390.2016.114879310.3109/17435390.2016.1148793 ↗
12. Bachler G. · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2013 · 8 · 3365
13. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.01810.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.018 ↗
14. 10.1021/es103316q10.1021/es103316q ↗
15. Triebig G. · Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Arbeitsmedizin · 1982 · 22 · 239
16. 10.1001/jama.1935.0276016001100410.1001/jama.1935.02760160011004 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.04510.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.045 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10928-014-9402-010.1007/s10928-014-9402-0 ↗
19. 10.3109/17435390.2014.94040410.3109/17435390.2014.940404 ↗
20. Bachler G. · 2015
21. 10.3109/17435390.2012.72638210.3109/17435390.2012.726382 ↗
22. 10.1021/nn303449n10.1021/nn303449n ↗
23. 10.1186/1743-8977-8-1810.1186/1743-8977-8-18 ↗
24. 10.1080/0895837070187466310.1080/08958370701874663 ↗
25. 10.1002/cpt.3710.1002/cpt.37 ↗
26. 10.1021/ar50020a00210.1021/ar50020a002 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b0022910.1021/acs.jcim.5b00229 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11095-008-9562-y10.1007/s11095-008-9562-y ↗
29. Lin Z. · Nanotoxicology · 2016 · 10 · 162
30. Chen W. · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2015 · 10 · 6277
31. Ingalls B. P. · 2013
32. 10.1007/s11926-013-0400-910.1007/s11926-013-0400-9 ↗
33. 10.1073/pnas.131283311010.1073/pnas.1312833110 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.bone.2015.05.01310.1016/j.bone.2015.05.013 ↗
35. 10.1126/science.aaa676010.1126/science.aaa6760 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0044510.1021/acs.accounts.8b00445 ↗
37. 2018
38. 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.10.03310.1016/j.xphs.2018.10.033 ↗
39. 10.1208/s12248-016-0010-310.1208/s12248-016-0010-3 ↗
40. 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.537710.2903/j.efsa.2018.5377 ↗
41. 10.1002/ieam.202610.1002/ieam.2026 ↗
42. 10.1016/0041-008X(79)90491-510.1016/0041-008X(79)90491-5 ↗
43. Report of Committee II on Permissible Dose for Internal Radiation International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 2 Ottawa ON1960.
44. 10.1289/ehp.01109s454710.1289/ehp.01109s4547 ↗