Overcoming the Trade‐Off between Optical Transmittance and Areal Capacitance of Transparent Supercapacitors for Practical Application
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract It is substantially challenging for transition metal oxide nanoparticle (NP)‐based electrodes for supercapacitors to achieve high transparency and large capacity simultaneously due to the inherent trade‐off between optical transmittance (T) and areal capacitance (CA). This study demonstrates how this trade‐off limitation can be overcome by replacing some electrode NPs with transparent tin oxide (SnO2) NPs. Although SnO2 NPs are non‐capacitive, they provide effective paths for charge transport, which simultaneously increase the CA and T550nm of the manganese oxide (Mn3O4) NP electrode from 11.7 to 13.4 mF cm−2 and 82.1% to 87.4%, respectively, when 25 wt% of Mn3O4 are replaced by SnO2. The obtained CA values at a given T are higher than those of the transparent electrodes previously reported. An energy storage window fabricated using the mixed‐NP electrodes exhibits the highest energy density among transparent supercapacitors previously reported. The improved energy density enables the window to operate various electronic devices for a considerable amount of time, demonstrating its applicability in constructing a reliable and space‐efficient building‐integrated power supply system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry Kookmin University Seoul 02707 South Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20200913610.1002/adfm.202009136 ↗
2. 10.1002/smll.20170190610.1002/smll.201701906 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma1111228010.3390/ma11112280 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.01510.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.015 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.10810810.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108108 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.06.05110.1016/j.ensm.2022.06.051 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41560-017-0016-910.1038/s41560-017-0016-9 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41560-018-0176-210.1038/s41560-018-0176-2 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.11038110.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110381 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.24910.1016/j.rser.2015.12.249 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0357810.1021/acsnano.5b03578 ↗
12. 10.1002/eem2.1209510.1002/eem2.12095 ↗
13. 10.1021/cm504801r10.1021/cm504801r ↗
14. 10.1039/C8SE00177D10.1039/C8SE00177D ↗
15. 10.1039/D1TA07246C10.1039/D1TA07246C ↗
16. 10.1038/s41578-019-0142-z10.1038/s41578-019-0142-z ↗
17. Cook J. B. · ACS Nano · 2019 · 13 · 1223
18. 10.1021/jp074464w10.1021/jp074464w ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13463510.1016/j.cej.2022.134635 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja027115i10.1021/ja027115i ↗
21. 10.1039/D0TA12612H10.1039/D0TA12612H ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20100114810.1002/adma.201001148 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.07210.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.072 ↗
24. 10.1021/cm503626s10.1021/cm503626s ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.9b1464510.1021/acsami.9b14645 ↗
26. 10.1039/D0TC04612D10.1039/D0TC04612D ↗
27. 10.1039/C5CC08373G10.1039/C5CC08373G ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14829010.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148290 ↗
29. 10.1039/C8NR01396A10.1039/C8NR01396A ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.21210.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.212 ↗
31. 10.1021/ja105296a10.1021/ja105296a ↗
32. 10.1002/adfm.20210643810.1002/adfm.202106438 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10971-006-7808-x10.1007/s10971-006-7808-x ↗
34. 10.1002/smll.20180115410.1002/smll.201801154 ↗
35. 10.1002/batt.20200018710.1002/batt.202000187 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.est.2022.10464110.1016/j.est.2022.104641 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.05210.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.052 ↗
38. 10.1021/nn305607710.1021/nn3056077 ↗
39. 10.1149/2.0931803jes10.1149/2.0931803jes ↗
40. 10.1021/nn202958310.1021/nn2029583 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.10926410.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109264 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.07410.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.074 ↗