Deciphering the Precursor–Performance Relationship of Single‐Atom Iron Oxygen Electroreduction Catalysts via Isomer Engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Single atom Fe–nitrogen–carbon (Fe–N–C) catalysts have high catalytic activity and selectivity for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), and are possible alternatives for Pt‐based materials. However, the reasonable design and selection of precursors to establish their relationship with Fe–N–C catalyst performance is still a formidable task. Herein, precursors with controllable structures are easily achieved through isomer engineering, with the purpose of regulating the active site density and microscopic morphology of the final electrocatalyst. As‐proof‐of‐concept, phenylenediamine isomers‐based polymers are used as precursors to fabricate Fe–N–C catalysts. The Fe–PpPD‐800 derived from p‐phenylenediamine shows that the best ORR activity with a half‐wave potential (E1/2) reaches 0.892 V vs reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), which is better than the counterparts derived from o‐phenylenediamine (Fe–PoPD‐800) and m‐phenylenediamine (Fe–PmPD‐800), even surpassing commercial Pt/C (E1/2 = 0.881 V vs RHE). Furthermore, the self‐made zinc–air battery based on Fe–PpPD‐800 achieves high power density and specific capacity up to 242 mW cm−2 and 873 mA h gZn−1 respectively, a stable open circuit voltage of 1.45 V, and excellent cycling stability. This work not only proves the practicability of adjusting the catalytic activity of single‐atom catalysts through isomer engineering, but also provides an approach to understand the relationship between precursors and target catalysts performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Chemistry/Institute of Polymers and Energy Chemistry Nanchang University 999 Xuefu Avenue Nanchang 330031 China
School of Materials Science and Engineering Nanchang University 999 Xuefu Avenue Nanchang 330031 China
Institute of Advanced Scientific Research (iASR) Key Laboratory of Functional Small Molecules for Ministry of Education Jiangxi Normal University 99 Ziyang Avenue Nanchang 330022 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2019.10941810.1016/j.rser.2019.109418 ↗
2. 10.1039/D1CS00135C10.1039/D1CS00135C ↗
3. 10.1038/nature1111510.1038/nature11115 ↗
4. 10.1039/C6CS00044D10.1039/C6CS00044D ↗
5. 10.1016/j.coco.2021.10099410.1016/j.coco.2021.100994 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0060910.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00609 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0026710.1021/acsenergylett.7b00267 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0005110.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00051 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.12.01410.1016/j.joule.2019.12.014 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0048810.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00488 ↗
11. 10.1002/smll.20190673510.1002/smll.201906735 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.04310.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.043 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11943710.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119437 ↗
14. 10.1039/D0TA09580J10.1039/D0TA09580J ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20200490010.1002/adma.202004900 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.21348310.1016/j.ccr.2020.213483 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20210086610.1002/aenm.202100866 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20210385710.1002/adfm.202103857 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0266510.1021/acsenergylett.0c02665 ↗
20. 10.1039/C9CC03153G10.1039/C9CC03153G ↗
21. 10.1039/D0EE03731A10.1039/D0EE03731A ↗
22. 10.1039/D1EE00306B10.1039/D1EE00306B ↗
23. 10.1039/D1TA01414E10.1039/D1TA01414E ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12515810.1016/j.cej.2020.125158 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.mtener.2020.10044410.1016/j.mtener.2020.100444 ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20200093610.1002/anie.202000936 ↗
27. 10.1021/jacs.9b1185210.1021/jacs.9b11852 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.03.00210.1016/j.chempr.2019.03.002 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41929-019-0304-910.1038/s41929-019-0304-9 ↗
30. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.910.1038/natrevmats.2016.9 ↗
31. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.2310.1038/natrevmats.2016.23 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20190739910.1002/adma.201907399 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20200313410.1002/adma.202003134 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20200467010.1002/adma.202004670 ↗
35. 10.1002/advs.20200044310.1002/advs.202000443 ↗
36. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0349610.1021/acscatal.0c03496 ↗
37. 10.1021/ja407552k10.1021/ja407552k ↗
38. 10.1039/C6GC01114D10.1039/C6GC01114D ↗
39. 10.1016/j.tet.2012.07.01210.1016/j.tet.2012.07.012 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.53810.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.538 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.01810.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.018 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41598-019-41563-w10.1038/s41598-019-41563-w ↗
43. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3935(19980601)199:6<1241::AID-MACP1241>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1521-3935(19980601)199:6<1241::AID-MACP1241>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
44. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.04610.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.046 ↗
45. 10.1002/adfm.20210486410.1002/adfm.202104864 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0248410.1021/acsenergylett.0c02484 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.01710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.017 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12019910.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120199 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41467-019-13430-910.1038/s41467-019-13430-9 ↗
50. 10.1002/anie.20190791510.1002/anie.201907915 ↗
51. 10.1002/adma.20150585510.1002/adma.201505855 ↗
52. 10.1039/D1NR01603B10.1039/D1NR01603B ↗
53. 10.1002/adma.20200323810.1002/adma.202003238 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41467-018-07850-210.1038/s41467-018-07850-2 ↗
55. 10.1002/adma.20200661310.1002/adma.202006613 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41929-019-0237-310.1038/s41929-019-0237-3 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10553310.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105533 ↗
58. 10.1002/anie.20140531410.1002/anie.201405314 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.05.01810.1016/j.cattod.2015.05.018 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12051210.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120512 ↗
61. 10.1038/s41467-020-18062-y10.1038/s41467-020-18062-y ↗