journal article·2014-08

Designing Non‐Native Iron‐Binding Site on a Protein Cage for Biological Synthesis of Nanoparticles

Tao Peng, David Paramelle, Barindra Sana, Chiu Fan Lee, Sierin Lim

Small· Volume 10· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

In biomineralization processes, a supramolecular organic structure is often used as a template for inorganic nanomaterial synthesis. The E2 protein cage derived from Geobacillus stearothermophilus pyruvate dehydrogenase and formed by the self‐assembly of 60 subunits, has been functionalized with non‐native iron‐mineralization capability by incorporating two types of iron‐binding peptides. The non‐native peptides introduced at the interior surface do not affect the self‐assembly of E2 protein subunits. In contrast to the wild‐type, the engineered E2 protein cages can serve as size‐ and shape‐constrained reactors for the synthesis of iron nanoparticles. Electrostatic interactions between anionic amino acids and cationic iron molecules drive the formation of iron oxide nanoparticles within the engineered E2 protein cages. The work expands the investigations on nanomaterial biosynthesis using engineered host‐guest encapsulation properties of protein cages.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bacteriophages and microbial interactions · Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials · Enzyme Structure and Function

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Bioengineering, School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Nanyang Technological University Singapore 637457

Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE) Agency for ScienceTechnology and Research (A*STAR) 3 Research Link Singapore 117602

Department of Bioengineering Imperial College LondonSouth Kensington Campus London SW7 2AZ United Kingdom

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199906)11:8<679::AID-ADMA679>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199906)11:8<679::AID-ADMA679>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
2. 10.1002/smll.20100199210.1002/smll.201001992 ↗
3. 10.1002/1521-4095(20021104)14:21<1562::AID-ADMA1562>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/1521-4095(20021104)14:21<1562::AID-ADMA1562>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
4. 10.1021/ic991269q10.1021/ic991269q ↗
5. 10.1021/ic701740q10.1021/ic701740q ↗
6. 10.1021/ja046735b10.1021/ja046735b ↗
7. 10.1002/smll.20110149410.1002/smll.201101494 ↗
8. 10.1002/smll.20130081010.1002/smll.201300810 ↗
9. 10.1039/b800936h10.1039/b800936h ↗
10. 10.1038/3021110.1038/30211 ↗
11. 10.1039/b805778h10.1039/b805778h ↗
12. 10.1021/nl049747410.1021/nl0497474 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20070286310.1002/adma.200702863 ↗
14. 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.00144510.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.001445 ↗
15. Chasteen N. D. · Met. Ions Biol. Syst. · 1998 · 35 · 479
16. 10.1021/bi049881310.1021/bi0498813 ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.080508310510.1073/pnas.0805083105 ↗
18. 10.1006/jsbi.1999.411810.1006/jsbi.1999.4118 ↗
19. 10.1116/1.348321610.1116/1.3483216 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.12.00510.1016/j.bbagen.2009.12.005 ↗
21. 10.1021/am302236610.1021/am3022366 ↗
22. 10.1002/1521-4095(20020318)14:6<415::AID-ADMA415>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/1521-4095(20020318)14:6<415::AID-ADMA415>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
23. 10.1002/1521-3773(20020201)41:3<459::AID-ANIE459>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/1521-3773(20020201)41:3<459::AID-ANIE459>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
24. 10.1073/pnas.96.4.124010.1073/pnas.96.4.1240 ↗
25. 10.1093/emboj/cdf57410.1093/emboj/cdf574 ↗
26. 10.1002/bit.2198810.1002/bit.21988 ↗
27. 10.1021/bm201587q10.1021/bm201587q ↗
28. 10.1021/bm300083e10.1021/bm300083e ↗
29. 10.1002/smll.20100224210.1002/smll.201002242 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00775005031010.1007/s007750050310 ↗
31. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System Version 1.3 Schrödinger LLC.http://www.pymol.org/citing
32. 10.1021/bm200543810.1021/bm2005438 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevA.21.94810.1103/PhysRevA.21.948 ↗
34. 10.1017/CBO978051162252610.1017/CBO9780511622526 ↗
35. 10.1074/jbc.M109.05979010.1074/jbc.M109.059790 ↗
36. 10.1126/science.269.5220.5410.1126/science.269.5220.54 ↗