Distortion of DNA Origami on Graphene Imaged with Advanced TEM Techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
While graphene may appear to be the ultimate support membrane for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging of DNA nanostructures, very little is known if it poses an advantage over conventional carbon supports in terms of resolution and contrast. Microscopic investigations are carried out on DNA origami nanoplates that are supported onto freestanding graphene, using advanced TEM techniques, including a new dark‐field technique that is recently developed in our lab. TEM images of stained and unstained DNA origami are presented with high contrast on both graphene and amorphous carbon membranes. On graphene, the images of the origami plates show severe unwanted distortions, where the rectangular shape of the nanoplates is significantly distorted. From a number of comparative control experiments, it is demonstrated that neither staining agents, nor screening ions, nor the level of electron‐beam irradiation cause this distortion. Instead, it is suggested that origami nanoplates are distorted due to hydrophobic interaction of the DNA bases with graphene upon adsorption of the DNA origami nanoplates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft Delft University of Technology Delft 2629HZ The Netherlands
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA
Funding
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek · European Research Council · Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.115693610.1126/science.1156936 ↗
2. 10.1039/C1CS15270J10.1039/C1CS15270J ↗
3. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.03.00210.1016/j.bbagen.2013.03.002 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.10.00210.1016/j.jsb.2010.10.002 ↗
5. 10.1021/nn404403510.1021/nn4044035 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20130606910.1002/adma.201306069 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.126090110.1126/science.1260901 ↗
8. 10.1038/nchem.107010.1038/nchem.1070 ↗
9. 10.1038/nature0458610.1038/nature04586 ↗
10. 10.1093/nar/gkp43610.1093/nar/gkp436 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0959-440X(97)80052-810.1016/S0959-440X(97)80052-8 ↗
12. 10.1126/sciadv.150073410.1126/sciadv.1500734 ↗
13. 10.1039/C6NR07958J10.1039/C6NR07958J ↗
14. 10.1021/nl303916210.1021/nl3039162 ↗
15. 10.1039/C2SM26950C10.1039/C2SM26950C ↗
16. 10.1098/rstb.2008.226810.1098/rstb.2008.2268 ↗
17. 10.1039/C4DT02700K10.1039/C4DT02700K ↗
18. 10.1142/p70310.1142/p703 ↗
19. 10.1017/S143192760606006510.1017/S1431927606060065 ↗
20. 10.1039/b101819c10.1039/b101819c ↗
21. 10.1016/S0022-5320(71)80118-110.1016/S0022-5320(71)80118-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.05.01910.1016/j.ultramic.2013.05.019 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.micron.2004.02.00310.1016/j.micron.2004.02.003 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.483003610.1063/1.4830036 ↗
25. 10.1038/nmeth.369510.1038/nmeth.3695 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.487199710.1063/1.4871997 ↗
27. 10.1021/la102518t10.1021/la102518t ↗
28. 10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.02310.1016/j.aca.2014.10.023 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20100591110.1002/anie.201005911 ↗
30. 10.1039/C5CC04678E10.1039/C5CC04678E ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20110619810.1002/anie.201106198 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.487053110.1063/1.4870531 ↗
33. 10.1038/nmeth.157010.1038/nmeth.1570 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.333709110.1063/1.3337091 ↗
35. 10.2478/s11534-011-0096-210.2478/s11534-011-0096-2 ↗