journal article·2015-08Open access

Efficient Radioisotope Energy Transfer by Gold Nanoclusters for Molecular Imaging

Olga Volotskova, Conroy Sun, Jason H. Stafford, Ai Leen Koh, Xiaowei Ma, Zhen Cheng, Bianxiao Cui, Guillem Pratx, Lei Xing

Small· Volume 11· Issue 32

Abstract

Beta‐emitting isotopes Fluorine‐18 and Yttrium‐90 are tested for their potential to stimulate gold nanoclusters conjugated with blood serum proteins (AuNCs). AuNCs excited by either medical radioisotope are found to be highly effective ionizing radiation energy transfer mediators, suitable for in vivo optical imaging. AuNCs synthesized with protein templates convert beta‐decaying radioisotope energy into tissue‐penetrating optical signals between 620 and 800 nm. Optical signals are not detected from AuNCs incubated with Technetium‐99m, a pure gamma emitter that is used as a control. Optical emission from AuNCs is not proportional to Cerenkov radiation, indicating that the energy transfer between the radionuclide and AuNC is only partially mediated by Cerenkov photons. A direct Coulombic interaction is proposed as a novel and significant mechanism of energy transfer between decaying radionuclides and AuNCs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford CA 94305 USA

Stanford Nanocharacterization Laboratory Stanford University Stanford CA 94305 USA

Department of Radiology Stanford University Stanford CA 94305 USA

Department of Chemistry Stanford University Stanford CA 94305 USA

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.112594910.1126/science.1125949 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature0691710.1038/nature06917 ↗
3. 10.1118/1.298614410.1118/1.2986144 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.01044.x10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.01044.x ↗
5. 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2004.03.00710.1053/j.semnuclmed.2004.03.007 ↗
6. Koolen B. · J. Oncol. · 2012 · 438647 · 8
7. 10.1562/0031-8655(2000)072<0234:MCAFOI>2.0.CO;210.1562/0031-8655(2000)072<0234:MCAFOI>2.0.CO;2 ↗
8. 10.1109/JPROC.2005.84426310.1109/JPROC.2005.844263 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.01.00110.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.01.001 ↗
10. Delikatny E. J. · Canser Res. · 2002 · 62 · 1394
11. 10.2967/jnumed.111.09171010.2967/jnumed.111.091710 ↗
12. Attix F. H. · 1991 · 160
13. 10.1364/OL.35.00110910.1364/OL.35.001109 ↗
14. 10.1371/journal.pone.000947010.1371/journal.pone.0009470 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20130256410.1002/anie.201302564 ↗
16. 10.1118/1.477028610.1118/1.4770286 ↗
17. 10.2967/jnumed.111.09854110.2967/jnumed.111.098541 ↗
18. 10.1098/rsta.2011.027110.1098/rsta.2011.0271 ↗
19. 10.1371/journal.pone.001330010.1371/journal.pone.0013300 ↗
20. 10.1002/smll.20090240810.1002/smll.200902408 ↗
21. 10.1038/nnano.2012.11010.1038/nnano.2012.110 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20050143410.1002/adma.200501434 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20110091910.1002/adma.201100919 ↗
24. 10.1039/C3CC48661C10.1039/C3CC48661C ↗
25. 10.1021/jp962922n10.1021/jp962922n ↗
26. 10.1021/jp971438x10.1021/jp971438x ↗
27. 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.67710.1103/RevModPhys.65.677 ↗
28. Zheng J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 07402
29. 10.1143/APEX.4.09500110.1143/APEX.4.095001 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.03.00510.1016/j.mattod.2013.03.005 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20140086610.1002/adma.201400866 ↗
32. 10.1021/ja806804u10.1021/ja806804u ↗
33. 10.1021/ac302417k10.1021/ac302417k ↗
34. 10.1016/S1386-1425(00)00313-910.1016/S1386-1425(00)00313-9 ↗
35. 10.1002/adhm.20130018910.1002/adhm.201300189 ↗
36. 10.1039/c0nr00359j10.1039/c0nr00359j ↗
37. 10.1021/ja801173r10.1021/ja801173r ↗
38. 10.1021/ac60279a01110.1021/ac60279a011 ↗
39. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/27/27510310.1088/0957-4484/22/27/275103 ↗
40. 10.1039/C3NR06040C10.1039/C3NR06040C ↗
41. 10.1117/1.365396310.1117/1.3653963 ↗
42. Wu C. S. · 1966
43. 10.2967/jnumed.109.06723110.2967/jnumed.109.067231 ↗