journal article·2008-02

Nanoscale Detection of Ionizing Radiation Damage to DNA by Atomic Force Microscopy

Changhong Ke, Yong Jiang, Piotr A. Mieczkowski, Garrett G. Muramoto, John P. Chute, Piotr E. Marszalek

Small· Volume 4· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The detection and quantification of ionizing radiation damage to DNA at a single‐molecule level by atomic force microscopy (AFM) is reported. The DNA damage‐detection technique combining supercoiled plasmid relaxation assay with AFM imaging is a direct and quantitative approach to detect gamma‐ray‐induced single‐ and double‐strand breaks in DNA, and its accuracy and reliability are validated through a comparison with traditional agarose gel electrophoresis. In addition, the dependence of radiation‐induced single‐strand breaks on plasmid size and concentration at a single‐molecule level in a low‐dose (1 Gy) and low‐concentration range (0.01 ng µL−1–10 ng µL−1) is investigated using the AFM‐based damage‐detection assay. The results clearly show that the number of single‐strand breaks per DNA molecule is linearly proportional to the plasmid size and inversely correlated to the DNA concentration. This assay can also efficiently detect DNA damage in highly dilute samples (0.01 ng µL−1), which is beyond the capability of traditional techniques. AFM imaging can uniquely supplement traditional techniques for sensitive measurements of damage to DNA by ionizing radiation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1056/NEJMra00036510.1056/NEJMra000365 ↗
2. 10.7326/0003-4819-140-12-200406150-0001510.7326/0003-4819-140-12-200406150-00015 ↗
3. 10.1371/journal.pmed.004010610.1371/journal.pmed.0040106 ↗
4. Friedberg E. C. · DNA Repair and Mutagenesis · 1995
5. 10.1016/S0079-6603(08)60611-X10.1016/S0079-6603(08)60611-X ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.97.1.10310.1073/pnas.97.1.103 ↗
7. 10.1088/0953-8984/17/18/00210.1088/0953-8984/17/18/002 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.94.2.49610.1073/pnas.94.2.496 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0165-022X(00)00049-X10.1016/S0165-022X(00)00049-X ↗
10. 10.1073/pnas.083091810010.1073/pnas.0830918100 ↗
11. 10.1667/RR3425.110.1667/RR3425.1 ↗
12. 10.2307/357709810.2307/3577098 ↗
13. 10.1118/1.59742010.1118/1.597420 ↗
14. Friedberg E. C. · DNA Repair and Mutagenesis · 1995
15. 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90599-310.1016/0003-2697(86)90599-3 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)91240-810.1016/S0021-9673(00)91240-8 ↗
17. 10.2307/357827510.2307/3578275 ↗
18. 10.1080/0955300851455162110.1080/09553008514551621 ↗
19. 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90176-810.1016/0003-2697(92)90176-8 ↗
20. 10.1080/0955300931455136110.1080/09553009314551361 ↗
21. 10.2307/357887310.2307/3578873 ↗
22. 10.2307/357856610.2307/3578566 ↗
23. 10.2307/357735910.2307/3577359 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.93010.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930 ↗
25. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.52.1.7110.1146/annurev.physchem.52.1.71 ↗
26. 10.1073/pnas.90.6.213710.1073/pnas.90.6.2137 ↗
27. Lyubchenko Y. L. · Biophys. J. · 1996 · 70 · 6
28. 10.1093/nar/gng13710.1093/nar/gng137 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0304-3991(03)00053-610.1016/S0304-3991(03)00053-6 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0304-3991(03)00051-210.1016/S0304-3991(03)00051-2 ↗
31. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a00674510.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006745 ↗
32. 10.2307/357988310.2307/3579883 ↗
33. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1997)5:4<163::AID-ROI1>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1997)5:4<163::AID-ROI1>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
34. 10.2307/358006010.2307/3580060 ↗
35. 10.1529/biophysj.107.10820910.1529/biophysj.107.108209 ↗
36. 10.1529/biophysj.105.06996310.1529/biophysj.105.069963 ↗
37. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a00674610.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006746 ↗
38. 10.1080/0955300005002891310.1080/09553000050028913 ↗
39. Parish J. H. · Principles and Practice of Experiments with Nucleic Acids · 1972
40. 10.1080/0955300871455155110.1080/09553008714551551 ↗
41. 10.1051/jcp:199912010.1051/jcp:1999120 ↗
42. 10.1080/09553009914083410.1080/095530099140834 ↗
43. 10.1269/jrr.43.S14910.1269/jrr.43.S149 ↗
44. In reality direct AFM imaging of our pUC18 samples indicates that <4% of the plasmids are in the relaxed circular form which is consistent with the observed small amount of damage introduced when purifying pUC18 using the QiaFilter plasmid maxi kit (see the section “AFM imaging and image analysis” in the Experimental Section and Reference [35]).
45. 10.1667/RR318710.1667/RR3187 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0025-5564(99)00019-X10.1016/S0025-5564(99)00019-X ↗