Nanoparticle‐Wetted Surfaces for Relays and Energy Transmission Contacts
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Submonolayer coatings of noble‐metal nanoparticle liquids (NPLs) are shown to provide replenishable surfaces with robust asperities and metallic conductivity that extends the durability of electrical relays by 10 to 100 times (depending on the current driven through the contact) as compared to alternative approaches. NPLs are single‐component materials consisting of a metal nanoparticle core (5–20 nm Au or Pt nanoparticles) surrounded by a covalently tethered ionic‐liquid corona of 1.5 to 2 nm. Common relay failure modes, such as stiction, surface distortion, and contact shorting, are suppressed with the addition of a submonolayer of NPLs to the contact surfaces. This distribution of NPLs results in a force profile for a contact–retraction cycle that is distinct from bare Au contacts and thicker, multilayer coatings of NPLs. Postmortem examination reveals a substantial decrease in topological change of the electrode surface relative to bare contacts, as well as an indication of lateral migration of the nanoparticles from the periphery towards the contact. A general extension of this concept to dynamic physical interfaces experiencing impact, sliding, or rolling affords alternatives to increase reliability and reduced losses for transmittance of electrical and mechanical energy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Leonardo Da Vinci Madrid Codices Manuscript I.1490 fol. 20v available from Biblioteca Nacional Madrid.
2. The 2004 global electromechanical and solid‐state relay market intelligence program 7th Edition report 4115 Electronics ca Publications Quebec Canada2004.
3. 10.1007/s11249-004-1778-310.1007/s11249-004-1778-3 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.219412510.1063/1.2194125 ↗
5. D. J. Dickrell M. T. Dugger Proc. 51st IEEE Holm Conf. Electr. Contacts 26–28 Sept. 2005 Chicago 2005 255–258.
6. 10.1016/S0924-4247(98)00264-710.1016/S0924-4247(98)00264-7 ↗
7. 10.1109/84.78863010.1109/84.788630 ↗
8. 10.1109/JMEMS.2005.85180610.1109/JMEMS.2005.851806 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.275359410.1063/1.2753594 ↗
10. 10.1109/EE.1947.644383010.1109/EE.1947.6443830 ↗
11. 10.1039/b312640b10.1039/b312640b ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.R73910.1103/PhysRevB.62.R739 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20040106010.1002/adma.200401060 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20050007610.1002/adfm.200500076 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0301-679X(01)00047-010.1016/S0301-679X(01)00047-0 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00225-210.1016/S1359-6454(02)00225-2 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20060079410.1002/adma.200600794 ↗
18. D. J. Nagy M. J. Nagy Proc. 24th Int. Conf. Thermoelectrics (ICT) 19–23 June 2005 IEEE Piscataway NJ2005 339–342.10.1109/ICT.2005.1519953 ↗
19. 10.1557/JMR.2005.025510.1557/JMR.2005.0255 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.159262810.1063/1.1592628 ↗
21. 10.1039/df951110005510.1039/df9511100055 ↗