Machine Learning‐Assisted Molecular Orbital Insights into OER Activity Descriptors of Component Gradient Ni‐Based LDH Electrocatalysts
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The conventional theories to predict the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance in electrochemical water‐electrolysis, including the d ‐band center and the e g orbital occupancy, encounter limitations under specific conditions. The d ‐band center serves as a partial descriptor of adsorption energy, leading to inconsistencies, and the e g orbital occupancy theory underestimates the contributions of other orbitals. Here, a machine learning‐assisted molecular orbital investigation is conducted to explore 3 d orbitals characteristics. To account for the crystal field effect and mitigate partition errors arising from orbital degeneracy, 3 d orbitals are categorized into e g and t 2g . The proposed descriptors are designed not only to predict performance but also to aid in elucidating the underlying determinants of performance. It elucidates nuanced performance determinants that are context‐dependent and can be categorized into two distinct types: electron‐deficient, e.g., Fe (3 d 6 ) and Co (3 d 7 ), and electron‐rich, e.g., Cu (3 d 9 ) and Zn (3 d 10 ). For electron‐deficient metals, the orbitals are unoccupied, with the electrons populating the t 2g orbital preferentially released as the valence state increases, thereby influencing performance, and vice versa. In summary, this work establishes a complex correlation between molecular orbitals and catalytic activity via ML, offering a novel perspective for advancing the design and elucidating the mechanisms of high‐performance OER electrocatalysts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials Science & Engineering Fuzhou University Fuzhou Fujian 350108 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20231567410.1002/adfm.202315674 ↗
2. 10.1002/ange.20231264410.1002/ange.202312644 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11274310.1016/j.rser.2022.112743 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20221072710.1002/adma.202210727 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aad499810.1126/science.aad4998 ↗
6. 10.1007/s41918-022-00159-110.1007/s41918-022-00159-1 ↗
7. 10.1007/s41918-022-00153-710.1007/s41918-022-00153-7 ↗
8. 10.1007/s41918-023-00190-w10.1007/s41918-023-00190-w ↗
9. 10.1038/s41467-023-36703-w10.1038/s41467-023-36703-w ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-023-37530-910.1038/s41467-023-37530-9 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat477810.1038/nmat4778 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20180629610.1002/adma.201806296 ↗
13. 10.1126/sciadv.abl927110.1126/sciadv.abl9271 ↗
14. 10.1039/D2CS01068B10.1039/D2CS01068B ↗
15. 10.1038/s41578-019-0152-x10.1038/s41578-019-0152-x ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.8b0965710.1021/jacs.8b09657 ↗
17. 10.1002/ange.20211469610.1002/ange.202114696 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20210765110.1002/adfm.202107651 ↗
19. Zhao Y. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2023 · 13
20. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10726610.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107266 ↗
21. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0127310.1021/acscatal.0c01273 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20220933810.1002/adma.202209338 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.121285810.1126/science.1212858 ↗
24. 10.1002/smll.20240013910.1002/smll.202400139 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0051110.1021/acsaem.8b00511 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0928710.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09287 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41467-024-45702-410.1038/s41467-024-45702-4 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41563-020-00876-210.1038/s41563-020-00876-2 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11244-013-0159-210.1007/s11244-013-0159-2 ↗
30. J. K.Nørskov F.Studt F.Abild‐Pedersen T.Bligaard Fundamental Concepts in Heterogeneous Catalysis John Wiley & Sons 2014.10.1002/9781118892114 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41586-020-2242-810.1038/s41586-020-2242-8 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.07.01010.1016/j.matt.2020.07.010 ↗
33. 10.1038/d41586-017-07820-610.1038/d41586-017-07820-6 ↗
34. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0524810.1021/acscatal.9b05248 ↗
35. J.Katriel R.Pauncz inAdv. Quantum Chem. vol.10 Elsevier 1977 pp.143–185.10.1016/S0065-3276(08)60580-8 ↗
36. 10.1002/advs.20230603510.1002/advs.202306035 ↗
37. 10.1021/acscatal.4c0324510.1021/acscatal.4c03245 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-023-38978-510.1038/s41467-023-38978-5 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.04.00910.1016/j.jpcs.2018.04.009 ↗
40. 10.1021/jp047349j10.1021/jp047349j ↗
41. 10.1002/cctc.20100039710.1002/cctc.201000397 ↗
42. 10.1002/adfm.20240010710.1002/adfm.202400107 ↗
43. 10.1126/science.abi982810.1126/science.abi9828 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.214110.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2141 ↗
45. 10.1006/jcat.2000.313610.1006/jcat.2000.3136 ↗
46. 10.1073/pnas.100665210810.1073/pnas.1006652108 ↗
47. 10.1021/jacs.2c0454010.1021/jacs.2c04540 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41467-024-52550-910.1038/s41467-024-52550-9 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0596410.1021/acs.jpcc.0c05964 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41467-022-31874-410.1038/s41467-022-31874-4 ↗
51. 10.1002/adma.20200329710.1002/adma.202003297 ↗
52. 10.1021/ja066927210.1021/ja0669272 ↗
53. 10.1038/s41467-024-52848-810.1038/s41467-024-52848-8 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.01410.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014 ↗
55. 10.1002/wcms.115910.1002/wcms.1159 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.277070810.1063/1.2770708 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.170310.1103/PhysRevB.54.1703 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
59. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.46394010.1063/1.463940 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
62. 10.1002/wcms.8110.1002/wcms.81 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.47852210.1063/1.478522 ↗
64. 10.1039/b508541a10.1039/b508541a ↗
65. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825