journal article·2024-08Open access

TiO2 Nanotube Arrays Inside Ultrafine Ti Tubes with an Aspect Ratio of 2500 for Sensing Needles: The Bubble Effect in a Confined Space

Kaiqi Zhao, Wei Xie, Rong Tang, Tengyu Chen, Li Li, Jinlin Liang, Lidong Sun

Small· Volume 20· Issue 35

Abstract

Abstract Capillary metal tubes have attracted considerable interest for flexible electronics, portable devices, trace sampling, and detection. Tailoring the microstructure and wettability inside the capillary tubes is of paramount importance, yet it presents great difficulty because of the spatial confinement. Here, the coupling effect is revealed between the fluidic and electric field induced by bubble motion in a confined space during anodic oxidation. By controlling the bubble regeneration and flow rate, uniform and superhydrophilic TiO2 nanotube arrays are developed throughout the inner surface of an ultrafine Ti tube with a diameter of 0.4 mm and length of 1000 mm, equivalent to an aspect ratio of 2500 that is the largest value being ever reported. The inner surface of a capillary tube is further coated with a polytetrafluoroethylene layer and explored as a sensing needle for liquid detection in terms of concentration and species. This study provides an innovative approach to tailor the microstructure and wettability in a confined space for functional capillary tubes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission School of Materials Science and Engineering Chongqing University Chongqing 400044 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0914610.1021/acsnano.0c09146 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20230299710.1002/adma.202302997 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20180132410.1002/adma.201801324 ↗
4. 10.1002/adhm.20220209610.1002/adhm.202202096 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature1934410.1038/nature19344 ↗
6. 10.1126/sciadv.abb552810.1126/sciadv.abb5528 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.11935410.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119354 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.12.01010.1016/j.joule.2021.12.010 ↗
9. 10.1021/nn404809910.1021/nn4048099 ↗
10. 10.1049/mnl.2018.553910.1049/mnl.2018.5539 ↗
11. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.3610.1038/natrevmats.2017.36 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.15510.1016/j.cej.2018.12.155 ↗
13. 10.1073/pnas.182149311610.1073/pnas.1821493116 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20201128810.1002/adfm.202011288 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20211020610.1002/anie.202110206 ↗
16. 10.1021/am900193710.1021/am9001937 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.03410.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.034 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cjche.2014.12.01010.1016/j.cjche.2014.12.010 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0312410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03124 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.04.02910.1016/j.corsci.2017.04.029 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13374610.1016/j.cej.2021.133746 ↗
22. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac65b510.1149/1945-7111/ac65b5 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.1c2072610.1021/acsami.1c20726 ↗
24. 10.1007/s40843-021-1731-410.1007/s40843-021-1731-4 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.07830210.1103/PhysRevLett.92.078302 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.00410.1016/j.isci.2018.08.004 ↗
27. 10.1016/S1387-1811(97)00043-710.1016/S1387-1811(97)00043-7 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20080339310.1002/adma.200803393 ↗
29. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/6/06570410.1088/0957-4484/21/6/065704 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41598-017-16369-310.1038/s41598-017-16369-3 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0003510.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00035 ↗
32. 10.1002/adts.20210047410.1002/adts.202100474 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.07710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.077 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41586-020-1985-610.1038/s41586-020-1985-6 ↗