journal article·2025-07Open access

Atomic Force Microscopy Reveals Differences In Mechanical Properties Linked To Cortical Structure In Mouse And Human Oocytes

Rose Bulteau, Lucie Barbier, Guillaume Lamour, Yassir Lemseffer, Marie‐Hélène Verlhac, Nicolas Tessandier, Elsa Labrune, Martin Lenz, Marie‐Emilie Terret, Clément Campillo

Small· Volume 21· Issue 29

Abstract

Abstract Cell mechanical properties regulate biological processes such as oocyte development. Cortical tension is regulated via actomyosin cortex remodeling to ensure optimal oocyte quality. However, the evolution of other mechanical parameters and their relationship with cortex structure remain poorly understood in mammalian oocytes. In this work, a methodology combining multiple mechanical parameters measured through Atomic Force Microscopy is proposed to investigate the relationship between oocyte mechanical properties and cortex organization. By studying mouse oocytes at various stages of development, along with engineered ones with specific cortex organization, it is demonstrated that a thin actin cortex corresponds to stiff oocytes while a thick one is associated with softer oocytes. It is further revealed that maternal age, a critical factor for fertility, affects mouse oocytes mechanics, correlating with alterations in their cortex structure. Finally, it is shown that the evolution of mechanical properties differs between human and mouse oocyte development, highlighting species‐specific differences in cortex organization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Reproductive Biology and Fertility · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Sperm and Testicular Function

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

LAMBE Univ Evry CNRS Université Paris‐Saclay Évry‐Courcouronnes 91025 France

Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology (CIRB) Collège de France Université PSL CNRS INSERM Paris 75005 France

Hospices Civils de Lyon service de médecine de la reproduction et préservation de fertilité; Inserm U1208 SBRI Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 faculté de médecine Laennec France

LPTMS CNRS Université Paris‐Sud Université Paris‐Saclay Orsay 91405 France

Institut Universitaire de France (IUF) Paris 75005 France

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche · Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.06.00310.1016/j.devcel.2012.06.003 ↗
2. 10.1038/nnano.2012.16710.1038/nnano.2012.167 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.micron.2012.01.01910.1016/j.micron.2012.01.019 ↗
4. 10.1152/physrev.00018.201310.1152/physrev.00018.2013 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82660-810.1016/S0006-3495(89)82660-8 ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.090335310610.1073/pnas.0903353106 ↗
7. 10.1038/ncb279910.1038/ncb2799 ↗
8. Larson S. M. · MBoC. · 2010 · 21 · 318210.1091/mbc.e10-01-0066 ↗
9. 10.1038/ncomms1080910.1038/ncomms10809 ↗
10. Bennabi I. · Nat. Commun. · 2020 · 11 · 164910.1038/s41467-020-15470-y ↗
11. 10.1038/ncomms702710.1038/ncomms7027 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.3c0778510.1021/acsami.3c07785 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.03410.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.034 ↗
14. 10.1073/pnas.131349111010.1073/pnas.1313491110 ↗
15. 10.1088/0022-3727/46/13/13300110.1088/0022-3727/46/13/133001 ↗
16. 10.1371/journal.pone.011258210.1371/journal.pone.0112582 ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms951210.1038/ncomms9512 ↗
18. 10.1098/rsif.2014.097010.1098/rsif.2014.0970 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c0125410.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01254 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12015-024-10717-310.1007/s12015-024-10717-3 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.02191410.1103/PhysRevE.72.021914 ↗
22. 10.1039/D0CS00318B10.1039/D0CS00318B ↗
23. 10.1038/s41563-019-0391-710.1038/s41563-019-0391-7 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.12.00810.1016/j.bpj.2023.12.008 ↗
25. Battistella A. · Bioengineering & Transla Med. · 2022 · 710.1002/btm2.10294 ↗
26. 10.1039/c6ib00044d10.1039/c6ib00044d ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.08.01210.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.08.012 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00249-019-01379-y10.1007/s00249-019-01379-y ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.03410.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.034 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.07210.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.072 ↗
31. 10.1038/ncomms1025310.1038/ncomms10253 ↗
32. Bulteau R. · 2024
33. 10.1115/1.289375410.1115/1.2893754 ↗
34. Lamour G. · Phys. Rev. X. · 2020 · 10
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.06810110.1103/PhysRevLett.125.068101 ↗
36. Wang H. · Sci. Adv. · 2020 · 610.1126/sciadv.aaz5004 ↗
37. 10.3389/fendo.2018.0032710.3389/fendo.2018.00327 ↗
38. 10.1152/physrev.00032.202210.1152/physrev.00032.2022 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41580-022-00517-310.1038/s41580-022-00517-3 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.01610.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.016 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41467-022-34715-610.1038/s41467-022-34715-6 ↗
42. 10.1038/srep0621310.1038/srep06213 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.10639310.1016/j.isci.2023.106393 ↗
44. 10.1093/biolre/ioac21910.1093/biolre/ioac219 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10439-012-0595-310.1007/s10439-012-0595-3 ↗
46. 10.1039/c004706f10.1039/c004706f ↗
47. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.01510.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.015 ↗
48. 10.1126/science.109508710.1126/science.1095087 ↗
49. Nikalayevich E. · Dev. Cell. · 2024 · 59 · 84110.1016/j.devcel.2024.01.027 ↗
50. 10.1126/science.122170810.1126/science.1221708 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41467-021-26611-210.1038/s41467-021-26611-2 ↗
52. 10.1021/la034136x10.1021/la034136x ↗
53. 10.1063/1.114543910.1063/1.1145439 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41592-018-0015-110.1038/s41592-018-0015-1 ↗
55. 10.1242/dev.120.4.101710.1242/dev.120.4.1017 ↗
56. 10.1038/ncb140610.1038/ncb1406 ↗
57. 10.1007/978-1-4939-8603-3_210.1007/978-1-4939-8603-3_2 ↗
58. 10.1007/978-1-4939-8603-3_1510.1007/978-1-4939-8603-3_15 ↗
59. 10.1006/dbio.1996.018610.1006/dbio.1996.0186 ↗
60. 10.1242/dev.0073110.1242/dev.00731 ↗
61. 10.1093/emboj/19.22.606510.1093/emboj/19.22.6065 ↗
62. 10.18637/jss.v025.i0110.18637/jss.v025.i01 ↗
63. A.Kassambara F.Mundt Factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses 2020 https://github.com/kassambara/factoextra.